ANAHEIM,
US, December 29 (IslamOnline.net & News Agencies) – After almost
two months of detention without bond, a US mosque leader said he's
innocent of terrorist links but agreed to leave the United States,
giving up his fight to remain in the country.
Wagdy
Ghoneim, 53, an Orange County mosque leader from Egypt who US
authorities claimed had given speeches that “could be considered
supportive of terrorist organizations” agreed Tuesday, December 28, to
leave the US voluntarily rather than fight a legal battle with
immigration officials, Los Angles Times reported Wednesday, 29
December.
“I
came to this country in peace,” Ghoneim said during a court hearing at
which the deal was struck. “I did not come here to scare anybody,”
the LA Times reported.
As
part of the agreement with government attorneys, he avoids deportation
in exchange for admitting he was in the United States in violation of
his immigration status, said Virginia Kice, a spokeswoman for US
Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Ghoneim,
whose case has drawn widespread support from Muslims in Southern
California, agreed to leave by January 7 for Qatar , where he holds a
work visa, in exchange for his release.
His
family, including his wife and seven children, also must leave the US .
Immigration Judge D.D. Sitgraves approved the agreement, which bars
Ghoneim's return for 10 years, LA Times reported.
Forced
Deal
Contacted
by IOL Wednesday, Ghoneim’s eldest son, Mohammed, said his father had
actually intended to fight a legal battle over his stay in the United
States , being sure he would eventually win.
“But
his lawyer told him he would be facing only two options; to remain
detained indefinitely without charge under anti-terror laws or to bail
out.”
Mohammed
further explained that his father applied to the US Immigration and
Customs Office six months ago to renew his visa.
“In
an unprecedented move, his application received no reply and his visa
renewal was rejected without reasons.”
Ghoneim’s
son, speaking to IOL over the phone from Alexandria, said that when it was
clear the US authorities were bent on persecuting his father against all
logic or laws, his attorney asked the judge to release her client, in
return for voluntarily leaving the United States for Qatar .
“The
attorney presented to the court a valid visa to Qatar my father obtained
to work as a religious consultant with the Qatari Islamic Waqfs
Authority.”
Unwarranted
Charges
The
US government has tried to accuse Ghoneim, who came to the US in 2001
from Egypt , of participation in fundraising activities around the
country that could have helped terrorist organizations, according to
Bill Odencrantz, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement director of
field legal operations.
Ghoneim
has not been charged with terrorist activity, however. Instead, he was
arrested at his Anaheim home November 4, on suspicion of overstaying his
religious-worker visa. He was charged with the immigration violation,
Odencrantz said, “because it was the easiest charge to prove.”
On
Tuesday, Ghoneim was in court to seek release on bond. But he faced
questioning from Immigration and Customs Enforcement attorney Elena
Kusky, who quizzed him about speeches he has made.
Ghoneim's
attorney, Valerie Curtis-Diop, called the government's line of
questioning a “fishing expedition.”
“It's
outrageous that they can arrest and detain someone with no real
evidence,” Curtis-Diop said.
“These
are the efforts the government thinks they need to take to find
terrorists, but they're attacking the wrong people.”
Curtis-Diop
said Richard Garcia, assistant director-in-charge of the L.A. office of
the FBI, testified at an earlier hearing that the FBI did not have an
interest in Ghoneim and did not request that he be detained.
More
than 100 of Ghoneim's supporters, many of them members of the Islamic
Institute of Orange County, where he serves as the imam, braved heavy
rain and gusty winds Tuesday morning to protest his detainment.
Ghoneim
was earlier transferred to a hospital with chest pains and then he was
back at a San Pedro federal detention center Monday while his attorneys
sought an emergency hearing to gain his release.
While
at the hospital, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials turned
away family and friends who sought to check on Ghoneim's condition, the
Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) reported.
Respected
Scholar
Ghoneim’s
agreement to leave the country comes a day after Southern California
Muslims met with Rep. Christopher Cox, R-Newport Beach , to protest his
detention.
About
two dozen Muslims presented a petition with more than 1,000 signatures
to Cox, urging him to investigate the arrest of a man described by local
Islamic leaders as a respected scholar.
Ghoneim,
a native of Egypt , arrived in Detroit in 2001 on a visitor's visa. He
was later authorized to remain in the United States on a visa for
religious workers until June 20, 2004 , according to documents provided
to his attorney by Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
His
attorney has said that Ghoneim applied for an extension of his visa and
was awaiting word when federal agents arrested him.
Selective
Application
After
the hearing, Hussam Ayloush, executive director of CAIR, criticized the
government's aggressive pursuit of the imam, according to the LA Times.
Ghoneim's
case is part of a disturbing trend, which Ayloush described as “the
selective application of laws on Muslims, especially on minor
violations; the targeting of Muslim travellers at airports; the revoking
of visas of Muslim visitors coming to the United States .”
The
US government has this year revoked visas of the singer formerly known
as Cat Stevens, now Yusuf Islam, and Swiss scholar Tariq Ramadan, who
was scheduled to teach at the University of Notre Dame.
Many
supporters, according to the LA Times, said they agreed with
Ghoneim's decision to leave voluntarily but expressed sadness that the
government believed he might be helping raise money for terrorists.
And
some said they no longer believed that the U.S. supported freedom of
speech and religion.
“I
am very sad today," said Ghoneim's wife, Somaia. “When we came to
the United States , we came for freedom, for free speech.”