 |
|
A
worker finishes preparing a billboard urging Iraqi citizens to
vote in the upcoming national elections
|
By
Samir Haddad, IOL Correspondent
BAGHDAD,
December 28 (IslamOnline.net) - Iraqi Shiites and Sunnis hit out
Tuesday, December 28, at US media reports that the US administration
was mulling to set aside parliamentary seats and cabinet portfolios to
the Sunnis by “playing with the end result” of the January 30
elections.
“The
US administration can’t appoint any one in the yet-to-be-elected
National Assembly (parliament),” Haitham Al-Hussani, the spokesman
for the Shiite Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq
(SCIRI) told IslamOnline.net.
“Only
the Iraqi people will choose their representatives through fair and
democratic elections.”
The
New York Times reported on Sunday,
December 26, that the US administration had raised the idea with Iraqi
leaders, including Grand Ayatollah Ali Al-Sistani.
“There's
a willingness to play with the end result - not changing the numbers,
but maybe guaranteeing that a certain number of seats go to Sunni
areas even if their candidates did not receive a certain percentage of
the vote,” an administration official told The Times on
condition of anonymity.
Iraqi
pundits said that the US is deeply concerned about Iran’s influence
on the Iraqi Shiite parities, which has prompted Washington to seek a
“parliamentary quota” for the Sunnis.
Hussani
said people cannot buy this talk of allocating some seats in the
parliament to a certain party or community.
Iraq’s
major Shiite groups unveiled on December 9 a unified list of 228
candidates to vie in the general elections, with the absence of
anti-occupation firebrand young leader Muqtada Al-Sadr.
Top
Shiite scholars, including Sistani himself, have threatened to
withhold support for the interim government if the elections were
postponed.
Mohammad
Al-Askari, an Iraqi military and political expert, told
IslamOnline.net last month that Shiites believed it was high time they
’dominated the countrys
political landscape
<http://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2004-11/30/article02.shtml>
after years of marginalization under the reign of ousted president
Saddam Hussein.
No
A Panacea
Ammar
Wajih Zinulabidine, the media officer of the major Sunni Islamic
Party, said the reported US plans are not a panacea to the current
crisis.
“The
proposed quota system only offers a temporary solution to the current
communal standoff but it abounds with minuses,” he told IOL.
“The
Americans, in addition, will be deceiving themselves if they think
that granting the Sunni boycotters some seats in the parliament will
help curb the unabated resistance.”
The
Association of Muslim Scholars (AMS), the highest Sunni religious
authority in Iraq, called for a boycott of the vote, citing the
impossibility of organizing fair elections under the current
deteriorating security situation.
The
Islamic Party has also decided to boycott the January vote.
“We
don’t believe in the communal quotas proposed by Washington. It is
not a proper way to reach out to our people,” added Zinulabidine.
Illegal
Ismail
Zayer, the spokesman for the Iraqiyon (Arabic for Iraqis) Group led by
interim Iraqi President Ghazi Al-Yawer, said the US plan is an
“illegal” interference in the country’s internal affairs.
“The
New York Times report is nothing but ideas raised by the US
administration,” he told IOL.
Fareed
Iyar, the spokesman for the Iraqi electoral commission, said the
January elections are governed by both Iraqi and United Nations laws.
“The
Iraqi people wouldn’t accept seeing their representatives handpicked
by the Americans,” he said.
US
and Iraqi officials have warned of a surge of attacks in the run up to
the January 30 elections, which will pick a 275-member Iraqi
parliament. The elected body will be assigned to draft Iraq's
post-Saddam Hussein constitution.
Britain’s
the Independent newspaper reported on December 20 that the
prevailing insecurity will make the election the
“most secretive in history.”