 |
|
“I
personally believe that we need a sort of federal system, which we
have already started,” Ismail said
|
KHARTOUM,
September 28 (IslamOnline.net & News Agencies) – The Sudanese
government has made conflicting statements on the idea of granting the
war-torn western Sudanese region of Darfur.
On
Monday, Foreign Minister Mustafa Osman Ismail supported the idea of
transforming war-torn Sudan's government into a federal system with
considerable autonomy granted to its states, including Darfur.
Tuesday,
September 28, another Sudanese minister backtracked on the idea as the
Khartoum government finalized an action plan for the devastated
western region, according to official newspapers.
Ismail,
in an interview with Reuters Monday, September 27, said a federal
system along the lines of Germany, Nigeria, the United States or
Canada would help the northeast African nation better cope with its
vast size and ethnic and religious diversity.
“I
personally believe that we need a sort of federal system, which we
have already started,” Ismail told Reuters.
“We
need to give it a strengthening. The people from Darfur state should
have the right to have a parliament, to have a governor, to have a
government to be elected by the people of Darfur,” he said.
The
question of autonomy should be addressed when talks begin between the
various warring parties on the country's political future, after the
fighting has ended and Sudan's humanitarian woes have been addressed,
he said.
The
UN refugee chief Ruud Lubbers, who was to hold talks with Sudanese
President Omar Al-Beshir later Tuesday, has repeatedly called for
self-rule for Darfur during a tour that has already taken him to
refugee camps in neighboring Chad and displaced person camps in the
region itself.
Not
Considered
 |
|
Lubbers
has repeatedly called for self-rule for Darfur
|
|
But
Sudan's junior Foreign Minister Naguib Al-Khair Abdel Wahab was quoted
as saying that self-rule for the non-Arab minorities of Darfur was an
issue that would not be considered until a later stage in troubled
peace talks with rebel negotiators in Nigeria, according to Agence
France-Presse (AFP).
He
rejected calls from Lubbers, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees who
arrived in Khartoum Monday, for an immediate pledge of a genuinely
federal constitution for all regions of Sudan to address the
grievances of the Darfur minorities, the Al-Sahafa daily
reported.
The
government would insist on "political arrangements which will be
based on principles endorsed by the government in the constitution and
Naivasha protocols," he said.
The
latter was a reference to preliminary agreements with southern rebels
of the Sudan People's Liberation Army granting self-rule to the south
and disputed adjacent districts.
Sudan's
existing constitution grants very limited autonomy to an array of
states, but critics say the units are deliberately drawn up to divide
the traditional regions of this vast country -- the biggest in Africa.
Abdel
Wahab's comments marked a significant toughening of position from a
pledge made by Information Minister Al-Zhawi Ibrahim Malik in an AFP
interview on August 3.
“We
are ready to share power and resources in Darfur, we are ready for
genuine federalism,” Malik said then.
The
junior Foreign Minister said he was nonetheless optimistic that the
key political round of peace talks with the Darfur rebels planned to
open October 21 would “not be as tense and difficult as the previous
round.”
The
Sudanese minister said the cabinet had now finalized its action plan
to meet a UN Security Council ultimatum to stem the suffering caused
by its bloody 19-month clampdown in Darfur, where up to 50,000 people
have died and 1.4 million been driven from their homes, according to
UN figures.
 |
|
Khartoum
says it put an action plan to tackle the humanitarian situation in
Darfur
|
|
The
government “has finished preparing a complete plan for dealing with
the recent Security Council resolution,” Abdel Wahab told Al-Sahafa.
He
offered no details of the blueprint, saying only that Khartoum would
“implement the plan in cooperation with the African Union in its
capacity as the primary sponsor of the Darfur question.”
The
UN Security Council on September 18 passed a US-drafted resolution
threatening to “envisage”
sanctions against Sudan's oil industry unless the Khartoum
government meets its commitment to restore security to its troubled
Darfur province.