 |
|
New opinion poll shows Blair would lose his huge overall majority if a general election were held now
|
LONDON,
June 11, (IslamOnline.net & News Agencies) – British Prime
Minister Tony Blair suffered a severe setback over his Iraq policy, as
results from a day of local polls showed voters turning against his
ruling Labor Party, press reports said Friday, June 11.
With
82 of 166 councils up for grabs having reported by early Friday, Labor
had lost a net 211 seats, closing in on the overall net loss of 400 or
more, which analysts had said would be a serious blow for Blair.
The
BBC projected Labour's vote share at just 26 percent, 12 percentage
points behind the Conservatives and below Britain's third party, the
Liberal Democrats, on 30 percent.
Some
metropolitan bastions fell out of Labour control, including the
northern city of Trafford which went to the Conservatives, according
to Reuters.
British
daily the Independent said the first results from the
"Super Thursday" elections suggested Labour was heading for
its worst performance since Blair became party leader 10 years ago.
If
the pattern is repeated when another 73 local authorities count their
votes Friday, the results would push Labour into third place and
provoke another bout of speculation about Blair's future and demands
for him to stand down before the general election, said the British
daily.
The
Liberal Democrats, also benefited from its anti-war stance and
traditional strong showing in local councils.
Iraq
Policy
Senior
government figures and analysts were quoted by Reuters as saying that
the Iraq invasion and ensuing instability during the U.S.-led
occupation had taken its toll, with election returns amounting to a
drubbing for Blair in his seventh year in power.
"There
is clearly a very strong protest vote," cabinet minister Tessa
Jowell told BBC television. "Iraq is certainly a factor but it is
only a factor."
One
Labour source agreed, telling the Independent: "There is a
backlash over Iraq. It is not confined to Muslims and professional
workers inside the M25. It is hurting us among working and
middle-class people, too."
The
Conservatives' showing was dented by their support for invasion of
Iraq and a surge by the hitherto marginal UK Independence Party, which
advocates withdrawal from the European Union.
Britain
has the second largest contingent in Iraq after that of the United
States, with Blair having given a staunch support to the invasion of
the oil-rich country in March last year on claims of its possession of
weapons of mass destruction – none of which have been found since.
Threats
To Leadership
The
results from Thursday's local council polls - to be followed by London
mayor results Friday night and European Parliament results Sunday -
will inevitably renew speculation about Blair's leadership.
Analysts
cautioned that regional and European elections - often used to kick
the government of the day - tend to have little bearing on the next
general election.
The
Independent said a new
opinion poll showed the embattled Premier would lose his huge overall
majority if a general election were held now and that Britain would
have a hung Parliament.
The
YouGov survey of 6,000 people for Sky News found that the Tories
(Conservatives) would get 36 per cent of the votes, Labour 32, the
Liberal Democrats 18, the UK Independence Party (UKIP) seven and other
parties seven.
These
figures would wipe out the 165-strong majority Blair won at the
previous election, the paper added.
But
most analysts still expect him to take Labour to a third general
election victory in 2005 despite the damage from Iraq and Blair's
alliance with President Bush.
Blair,
attending a G8 Summit with Bush and leaders of other eight
industrialized countries, remained convinced Labour's support would
revive in time for the general election, after Iraq had been turned
"into a better place, as I believe it will".
He
said that the Tories and Liberal Democrats had not presented any
policies that gave him concern during the recent campaign.
Blair,
in power since 1997, had been universally predicted to fare badly, but
has repeated in recent days that he is in no mood to hand over the
reins to a party successor.
Growing
public opposition over the Iraq invasion is still there, demonstrated
by mass demonstrations in the run-up and after the offensive, as no
WMDs have been found in Iraq, raising fears that the U.S.-British
strikes were based on false pretexts.
Blair
paid less attention to the withering and unprecedented
criticism from the most senior former officials in the
Foreign Office for toeing the U.S. line in the Middle East and
occupied Iraq.
On
April 17, over 1,000 protestors converged
outside Downing Street demanding Blair to withdraw
troops from Iraq and withhold support for American recognition of
Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories.
The
Legal Action Against War, a British anti-war group, said in March it wanted
the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague to consider
whether Blair and his government officials should be tried for war
crimes over the Iraq occupation.