 |
|
Yawer
belongs to Shammar, Iraq’s biggest clan
|
By
Mazen Ghazi, IOL Correspondent
BAGHDAD,
June 2 (IslamOnline.net) – Two of Iraq's three largest tribal groups
have expressed reservations about the manner in which Iraq's new
interim government was selected.
Iraq's
Governing Council named
Tuesday, June 1, Sheikh Ghazi Al-Yawer – a leader of Iraq’s
biggest clan Shammar – as interim president after Council member
Adnan Pachachi turned down the post.
Hours
later, the new cabinet line-up was officially
installed under prime minister Ayad Allawi.
"There
was no sound mechanism for picking members of the government, which
will only be an extension to the time of [Governing Council] which
lacked legitimacy and public support," Sheikh Nasrallah
Abdel-Karim, the spokesman for the National Council of Iraqi Clans,
told IslamOnline.net.
"The
line-up was a byproduct of occupation, and the government will, one
way or another, serve the will of the occupation authority which
brought to power," he maintained.
Abdel-Karim,
whose council groups Sunni and Shiite clans, said occupation officials
exploited some persons to take up responsibility for the coming
"critical and sensitive period, in which decisive actions will be
taken regarding the future of Iraq and its relations with the
occupiers".
However,
he stressed that the council has no reservations about the personality
of Al-Yawer, noting he "hails from a famed family held by all
Iraqis in high esteem".
Yawer
was a member of the clans council before being appointed to the
U.S.-handpicked Governing Council.
The
clans council had refused to be officially represented in the
U.S.-sanctioned body.
'Farce'
Ghaleb
Al-Rekabi, the secretary general of the Democratic Grouping of Iraqi
Clans, underlined that the choice of Yawer without elections is
"rejected and raises a lot of question marks".
He
told IOL that selection process was nothing but a "farce"
played by the U.S. occupation forces and first started with the
creation of the Governing Council.
Al-Rekabi
argued that the Americans went public with their support of Pachachi
and opposition to Yawer only to secure a public support for the
latter.
Joining
up the opposition chorus, Harith Al-Dari, the secretary general of the
Muslim Scholars Association, said the new government is an
"American product", and expected the lineup to crumble in
failure.
"This
is a play produced by the Americans and performed after the consent of
the U.S.-made Iraqi Governing Council," he told IOL.
The
Sunni scholar said the government is based on sectarian division and
its members are unknowns "which runs counter to earlier
statements that the government will be a one grouping
efficiencies".
'Central
Power'
However,
the National Alliance of Iraqi Clans and Tribes said the selection of
Yawer to lead the country is "favorable regardless of the fact
that he took office with no general elections".
"He
is a scion of a famous and influential family – something which
provides Yawer with a central power and affect his political
decisions," said Sami Al-Daylami, a spokesman for the alliance.
"This
tribal allegiance increases his power, not the opposite. But the price
is to [honor] tribal traditions".
"He
knows well what it means when an American soldier ties or detains a
woman, or when he puts his shoes on an Iraqi detainee".
Al-Daylami
hoped the new government's decisions will not be "at the hands of
the occupation forces".
"We
are in no need for a transitional government lacking real powers,
authorities or financial sources to run Iraq".
The
new government will take power from the U.S.-run Coalition Provisional
Authority (CPA) on 30 June and will run the country until elections
are held in next January.
The
U.S. and Britain submitted late Tuesday to the U.N. Security Council a
revised
draft resolution on Iraq that includes more sovereignty to the
government.
But
it doesn't specifically give the new leaders the right to ask a
multinational force to leave, and still authorizes the U.S.-led forces
to take "all necessary measures" to provide stability.