|

|
|
"The
power transfer has to be real and genuine," said Blair (AFP)
|
LONDON,
May 26 (IslamOnline.net & News Agencies) – The U.S. and its
closest ally Britain seemed to be at odd over who will have the final
saying on military operations in Iraq following the June 30 transfer
of sovereignty to a provisional Iraqi government.
British
Prime Minister Tony Blair said Tuesday, May 25, that the new Iraqi
cabinet will have a veto over any military action by the U.S.-led
forces.
However,
U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell maintained that the troops will
remain under American command and might take action without
consultation with the interim government.
Highlighting
the rare public disagreement, the Independent wrote that Blair and
Powell "clash over Iraqi veto on allied forces".
While
the Daily Mirror said the war duo "were for the first time
in open disagreement over coalition policy on Iraq".
However,
the Guardian had a different reading of the seeming
disagreement, suggesting that Blair had just "jumped the
gun" when he "unequivocally" promised the interim Iraqi
government such a power.
Blair
told a press conference in Downing Street that the power transfer has
to be "real and genuine," adding that the U.S.-led forces
will "remain in Iraq with the consent of the Iraqi
government," reported Agence France-Presse (AFP).
"Let
me make it 100% clear, after June 30 there will be the full transfer
of sovereignty to the Iraqi government."
Asked
whether the Iraqi ministers would have a veto over military action
such as a renewed assault on the restive town of Fallujah following
June 30, Blair responded to the affirmative.
"If
there is a political decision as to whether you go into a place like
Fallujah in a particular way, that has to be done with the consent of
the Iraqi government."
Specific
operational issues would have to be decided on the ground between
"coalition" commanders and the interim government, Blair
added.
Late
Tuesday, Iraqi Governing Council member Adnan Pachachi said he wanted
the forthcoming U.N. resolution "clarified" to make clear
that multinational troops are in Iraq at the invitation of Baghdad,
and that any operations must be conducted in consultation with the
interim government.
"We
want to make it absolutely clear that the multinational force is in
Iraq with the consent of the Iraqi government and that its operations
and activities will be conducted in agreement and consultation with
the Iraqi government," he told the BBC.
"It
is our understanding that any operations would have to have the
approval of the Iraqi government," said Pachachi, tipped as a
possible new Iraqi leader.
On
Monday, May 24, the U.S. and Britain presented a new draft resolution
on Iraq to the U.N. Security Council which sets no date for the
pullout of their troops from Iraq and gives them wide-ranging powers
to maintain order and fight "terrorism".
Earlier
Tuesday, Iraqi interim defense minister Ali Allawi hinted that once
sovereignty was transferred, Baghdad was likely to want the foreign
troops out of the country relatively soon.
"In
terms of time for the presence of the international forces to help us
establish security and stability, I think it will be a question of
months rather than years," he told a joint press conference in
London with British Defense Secretary Geoff Hoon.
"The
multinational force, in as much as its presence is needed to maintain
security, will need ... to be replaced by indigenous forces, by Iraqi
forces," Allawi said.
Under
U.S. Command
|

|
|
"The
U.S. forces remain under U.S. command and will do what is
necessary to protect themselves," said Powell
|
However,
Powell struck the discordant note, saying the U.S. would coordinate
military action with the interim government but would not forfeit
their right to "self-defense".
"Ultimately,
however, if it comes down to United States Armed Forces protecting
themselves or in some way accomplishing their mission in a way that
might not be in total consonance with what the Iraqi interim
government might want to do at a particular moment in time, U.S.
forces remain under U.S. command and will do what is necessary to
protect themselves," he said.
Political
and military coordinating committees would be established to prevent
any squabbles, Powell said at a State Department reception honoring
the U.S. Institute of Peace, an international study center.
"We're
confident that this will be manageable," Powell said.
Last
month, Powell maintained that the interim Iraqi government would have
to give
away some of its powers to occupation forces.
U.S.
President George W. Bush outlined
Monday a five-step plan for power transfer to Iraqis, a scheme
criticized by Democratic presidential hopeful John Kerry as
"little new".