|

|
|
Rumsfeld
faces the most serious setback he suffered during his career (AFP)
|
WASHINGTON,
May 10 (IslamOnline.net) – Breaking one year of silence, senior U.S.
military officials hit out at the Pentagon’s strategic and tactical
blunders, calling for sacking their boss Donald Rumsfeld and his top
aides, a mass-circulation U.S. daily reported on Sunday, May 9.
Meanwhile,
U.S. Rev. and civil rights activist Jesse Jackson said that Rumsfeld
should stand international investigation, calling for an end to the
U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.
Several
of those generals and officers interviewed by the Washington Post,
some of whom spoke on condition of anonymity, warned that a profound
anger is building within the army at Rumsfeld and those around him,
saying the U.S. "is already on the road to defeat" in Iraq.
Voicing
their resentment publicly for the first time since the U.S. tanks
rolled into Baghdad on April 9, 2003, the officers said though the
U.S. is winning militarily, it is failing to win the hearts and minds
of the Iraqi people and losing strategically, especially after the
prisoner scandal, which exploded onto the world stage later last
month.
Asked
whether the U.S. army is losing the war in Iraq, Army Maj. Gen.
Charles H. Swannack Jr., the commander of the 82nd Airborne Division,
who spent much of the year in western Iraq, said, "I think
strategically, we are".
Army
Col. Paul Hughes, who last year was the first director of strategic
planning for the U.S. occupation authority in Baghdad, agreed, noting
a pattern of winning battles while losing a war characterized the U.S.
failure in Vietnam.
"Unless
we ensure that we have coherency in our policy, we will lose
strategically," he said.
He
added that the U.S. invasion of Iraq was doomed to failure
"because we don’t understand the war we’re in".
Larry
Diamond, who until recently was a senior political adviser of the U.S.
occupation authority in Iraq, said the U.S. dreams in Iraq are
"up in the air now".
"That's
what is at stake. . . . We can't keep making tactical and strategic
mistakes."
Rumsfeld
To Blame
|

|
|
Protesters
chant "Fire Rumsfeld" during a Congress hearing on Iraqi
prisoner scandal (AFP)
|
Asked
who was to blame, a senior general at the Pentagon said decisively
Rumsfeld and Pentagon no. 2 Paul D. Wolfowitz.
"The
current OSD [Office of the Secretary of Defense] refused to listen or
adhere to military advice," the general told the paper.
"It
is doubtful we can go on much longer like this," he said.
"The American people may not stand for it -- and they should
not."
A
Special Forces officer also called for Rumsfeld’s resignation,
saying, "Rumsfeld needs to go, as does Wolfowitz".
Retired
Army Col. Robert Killebrew, a frequent Pentagon consultant, said,
"The people in the military are mad as hell."
He
said the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force Gen. Richard
B. Myers, should be fired.
He
and others are recommending a series of related revisions to the U.S.
approach in the occupied country.
Defense
consultant Michael Vickers, for instance, advocates trimming the U.S.
presence in Iraq, making it much more like the one in Afghanistan,
where there are 20,000 troops and almost none in the capital, Kabul.
Rumsfeld
faced mounting pressure from U.S. Senators, Representatives and the
press to step down, after the Iraqi prisoner scandal, though he
offered his "deepest
apology" and took responsibility for the misconduct of
his soldiers.
Apologies
by President George W. Bush and other top officials have so
far failed to water international outrage over the
graphic photos of tortured and sexually abused
prisoners.
The
Washington Post splashed Thursday, May 6, more abhorrent
photos, saying it had obtained 1,000 digital pictures.
One
of the photos showed a soldier holding a leash tied around the
neck of a naked Iraqi detainee grimacing and lying on the floor.
Pentagon
Armchairs
Commanders
on the ground in Iraq ridiculed the optimistic clichés of Pentagon
armchairs, who continue to put on a happy face publicly.
But
privately are grim about the situation in Baghdad. When it comes to
discussions of the administration's Iraq policy, said one Pentagon
consultant.
"It's
'Dead Man Walking,'" he said.
Army
Col. Dana J.H. Pittard, commander of a 1st Infantry Division brigade
based in Baquba, north of Baghdad, said the view from Washington is
much worse than it appears on the ground.
The
paper cited an article written in the New York Review of Books in
mid-April by former U.S. ambassador to Croatia Peter Galbraith under
the title "How to Get out of Iraq".
It
said the article was carried online and began circulating among some
the U.S. military.
Shoring
Up Rumsfeld
But
the U.S. administration has sought to defend Rumsfeld. Bush's national
security adviser Condoleezza Rice said Rumsfeld retains the
president's "strongest possible support".
"The
president strongly supports Donald Rumsfeld and so do his colleagues,
and I strongly support him," Rice told The New York Times
in an interview published Sunday.
"He's
doing a good job as secretary of defense in one of the most
challenging periods in American history."
Vice
President Richard Cheney told the paper through a spokesman that
"Don Rumsfeld is the best secretary of defense the United States
has ever had. People ought to let him do his job."
Rice
said "what the president expects, and what the secretary's doing,
is getting to the bottom of what's happened. This is an awful
situation."