 |
|
"The inalienable rights of the Palestinian people cannot be decided by Israeli polls," said Haniya
|
By
Yasser Al-Banna, IOL Correspondent
GAZA
CITY, May 4 (IslamOnline.net) – The Likud rejection of Israeli
Premier Ariel Sharon’s pullout plan proves that the decision-making
process lies in the hands of Israel’s extremists, making the armed
resistance the only option to liberate the occupied Palestinians
territories, Palestinian resistance leaders said.
"The
Likud’s poll results demonstrate that the Zionist society is adamant
about holding on to the occupied Palestinian territories which would
further inflame the situation," Ismail Haniya, a Hamas leader,
said in a press statement Monday, April 3.
"The
inalienable rights of the Palestinian people cannot be decided by
Israeli polls but rather by the Palestinians themselves."
The
voting results, announced late Sunday, May 2, showed that a
total of 59.5 percent of the some 193,000 Likud members who cast
their ballots spurned the plan, against just 39.7 percent.
The
rejection by Sharon’s own party of the plan he spent most of the
past several months promoting, is one of the most serious setbacks
Sharon has suffered since taking office in March 2001.
Catalyst
|
|
"With or without this plan, the resistance will go unabated, which is the best solution to our people," said Zahri |
Sami
Abu Zahri, another Hamas leader in the Gaza Strip, said the results,
which showed the Israelis’ adamancy not to quit the land of
Palestine, should serve as a "catalyst" for the Palestinians
to stick to and protect their rights till the last breath.
"With
or without this plan, the resistance will go unabated because it is
the best solution to our people," Zahri told IslamOnline.net.
He
added that the Likud’s opposition came as a "direct
condemnation of the United States for volunteering to support the plan
without a Palestinian approval first".
U.S.
President George W. Bush endorsed
Sharon’s unilateral approach on April 14, adding that it was
"unrealistic" that Israel return to the 1948 armistice
lines.
The
centerpiece of his U.S.-backed "disengagement" plan is the
removal of all existing 21 Jewish settlements from the Gaza Strip.
Currently
some 8,000 Jewish settlers live in the Strip, alongside 1.5 million
Palestinians.
Bush
coupled his support with written guarantees that saw that "a fair
solution to the Palestinian refugee issue should be found through a
Palestinian state rather than in [what now is] Israel".
Self-Determination
Saleh
Zidan, member of the politburo of the Democratic Front for the
Liberation of Palestine (DFLP), said the Palestinians should not let
the Likud decide for them.
"We
don’t care about the outcome of this poll and insist on our
non-negotiable rights," he told IOL.
Zidan
said Sharon’s failure to pass his one-sided plan "despite his
extremist and right-wing approach" showed that "Israel is
ruled by the most extremist people in society".
He
agreed that the resistance should continue in view of Israel’s
incessant aggressions, urging all Palestinian factions to act in
unison.
Kayid
Al-Ghoul, member of the politburo of the Popular Front for the
Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), echoed the same views.
He
told IOL that a possible Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip would
not "end the occupation but ease the backbreaking burden on the
Israeli occupation army, cut down its heavy losses and re-deploy
the [Jewish] settlers to other areas in the West Bank".
The
plan is also seen by the Palestinian Authority (PA) as a land grab as
it calls for considering Jewish settlements built on the Palestinian
West bank an inseparable part of Israel.
Disillusion
 |
|
"The dream of a ‘Greater Israel’ is deeply rooted in the Israeli mindset," said Ghoul |
Ghoul
further said it is high time for the Palestinians supporting peace
talks with the Israelis to be "disillusioned".
"The
dream of a ‘Greater Israel’ is deeply rooted in the Israeli
mindset," he said.
"The
poll showed that the right-wing current is gaining ground inside the
ruling Likud party, which is already known for its extremist
agenda."
Ghoul
added that the Likud’s stand proved that Israel was not ready to
reach a political solution to the conflict.
"The
submission to the Israeli government will only encourage it to take
more fascist steps and evade international law," he maintained.
But
Amin Maqboul, member of Fatah’s Revolutionary Council, said the door
should remain open before the political solution despite the Likud’s
stand.
"We
must stand by the international initiatives, even though they don’t
meet the minimum of Palestinian rights. The Palestinians should
continue to address the international community through a political
agenda," Maqboul told IOL.
The
Palestinian Authority was swift to call anew for the resumption of
negotiations following the Likud voting.
Prime
Minister Ahmad Qorei hoped that the results would serve as an
"incentive" to put the moribund peace process back on track.
He
said the Likud rejection was "expected" because the plan was
not negotiated with the Palestinians.
Qorei
also called for holding an international conference to inject new life
into the internationally-backed ‘roadmap’ for Middle East peace.