 |
|
“Now, if the sources fell apart, then we need to find out how we've gotten ourselves in that position,” Powell
|
WASHINGTON, April 3 (IslamOnline.net & News Agencies) – U.S. Secretary of
State Colin Powell acknowledged that the pre-war information he gave the
United Nations to justify the invasion-turned occupation of Iraq was not “solid” any longer, heaping the blame on the intelligence
community.
Before
the invasion, Powell dramatically presented the United Nations with data
on Iraq ’s alleged mobile biological weapons laboratories, making it the
central rationale for the invasion.
“Now
it appears not to be the case, that it was that solid,” Agence
France-Presse (AFP) quoted Powell as telling reporters Friday, April 2,
on the plane taking him back to Washington from Brussels.
“But
at the time I was preparing that presentation it was presented to me as
being solid,” he said.
Powell
said that before his
February 5, 2003, speech at the United Nations he had asked the
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) for data that would show the danger of
the weapons of mass destruction Iraq was supposedly developing, and
which have never been found in Iraq to date.
‘Best
Intelligence’
He
said the information about the suspected WMD had been presented to him
prior to his passionate presentation before the U.N. Security Council
“as the best information and intelligence that we had”.
He
said he had been given CIA assurances that the information he was
working on was solid.
“I'm
not the intelligence community, but I probed and made sure, as I said in
my presentation, these are multi-sourced,” he said.
“And
that was the most dramatic of them and I made sure it was
multi-sourced.”
He
continued: “And I looked at the four elements that they gave me for
that one and they stood behind them.
“Now,
if the sources fell apart, then we need to find out how we've gotten
ourselves in that position.”
The
U.S. top diplomat hoped that an independent commission that is going to
be starting its work soon will look into these matters to see whether or
not the intelligence agency had a basis for the confidence that they
placed in the intelligence at that time.
Congress-pressured
U.S. President George W. Bush ordered
in February a bipartisan commission to probe apparent flaws in
intelligence used to invade Iraq.
British
reports revealed last May that Powell and his British counterpart Jack
Straw privately voiced doubts over Iraq’s alleged weapons program.
The
Guardian said that the doubts emerged
at a private meeting between Powell and Straw shortly before
Powell’s presentation.
The
U.S. failure to find the alleged weapons in Iraq following the country's
occupation has embarrassed the U.S. administration, damaged its standing
around the world and drawn sharp criticism of its intelligence
community.
The
Washington Post reported last month that information about the
mobile laboratories was second-hand and came from an Iraqi exile, a
chemist, who had never been interrogated by U.S. intelligence officials.
The
embarrassment culminated in the resignation of David Kay, the head of
the U.S. 1,400-member Iraq Survey Group which has been searching Iraq
for the alleged WMD, over failure
to find any truce of such weapons.