 |
|
The paper says Rumsfeld mulls how to drag Syria into a battlefield
|
WASHINGTON,
January 25 (IslamOnline.net) – The toppling of the Syrian regime and
the disbanding of Hizbullah resistance movement come high on the
military agenda of the current U.S. administration, a prominent
Arab-language newspaper reported on Sunday, January 25.
Washington
is also planning to pressure Syria into stopping its support for
Palestinian resistance groups and abandoning its alleged weapons
programs, the London-based Al-Sharq Al-Awsat reported citing a western
intelligence periodical.
The
periodical said Syria and Iran are now the most likely target for a
regime change like Iraq and Afghanistan.
It
added that the U.S. army had deployed more troops on the Iraqi-Syrian
borders and U.S. warplanes had frequently violated the Syrian
airspace.
Citing
U.S. intelligence sources, the London-based daily said U.S. Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is also mulling to launch more
"pre-emptive strikes" against the Lebanese resistance
movement Hizbullah and Somalia.
Somali
government source accused
the United States last month of installing electronic espionage
devices and cameras in a remote island in the country's territorial
waters.
Rumsfeld
also suggested striking Hizbullah's bases in Lebanon, which might drag
Syria into the battlefield.
Asked
to comment on the reports, a Pentagon spokesman dodged the question,
saying any future military operation would be carried out if the U.S.
administration gave the go-ahead.
The
Pentagon "deliberately" leak the periodical's report in a
daily publication issued by the State Department called "Early
Bird", the paper said.
Analysts
believe that the leak is intended for highlighting and confirming the
report.
Rumsfeld's
plans were also published in Israeli Jerusalem Post daily, Al-Sharq
Al-Awsat said.
Last
month, U.S. President George W. Bush inked
a bill to impose economic and diplomatic sanctions on Syria over
its alleged support for "terrorism" and
"occupation" of Lebanese territories.
Leading
Senators, who voted down the bill, feared that the measure could later
be used to build a case for a
military intervention against Syria.
The
report came as tensions between Hizbullah and Israel ran
high last week when an Israeli military bulldozer violated the
U.N.-demarcated Blue Line and was immediately destroyed by a Hizbullah
missile.
It
is the worst flare-up on the frontier since an
Israeli air raid on an alleged Palestinian base in Syria in
October 2003, the first attack on Syrian soil in three decades.
Turkish
Mediation
On
the diplomatic front, Israel confirmed Saturday, January 24, it had
accepted an offer by Turkey -- its only regional ally -- to mediate in
possible talks with Syria.
"We
have agreed to Turkey's offer of assistance in anything to do with the
Syrian track," Israeli foreign ministry spokesman Jonathan Peled
told Agence France-Presse (AFP).
He,
however, denied that the move amounted to an Israeli acceptance of
recent Syrian peace overtures.
A
prominent Egyptian journalist revealed
to IslamOnline.net last week that Syria had accepted to re-start peace
talks with Israel from scratch but Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon
set several preconditions.
Turkish
Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said at the World Economic Forum
in Davos, Switzerland, that he had received a positive response from
both sides to Ankara's offer.
During
previous talks, held under Hafez al-Assad, Syrian President Bashar Al
Assad's late father, then Israeli Premier Ehud Barak accepted in
principle an Israeli pullout from the Syrian Golan Heights, occupied
by Israel in 1967.
Talks
broke off after Israel refused to withdraw from a narrow strip of land
bordering the eastern bank of the Sea of Galilee.
The
area is a grassy plateau overlooking north-eastern Israel and have
important water resources - providing Israel with a third of its water
needs.
Israeli
President Moshe Katsav on January 12 invited
Assad to visit occupied Jerusalem to "start" talks on a
peace accord, with no preconditions but the Syrians rebuffed the
invitation as
"not serious".