CAIRO,
January 3 (IslamOnline.net) - A research on the role of educational
curricula in the emergence and development of “extravagance and
fanaticism” in the Saudi Kingdom, submitted last week to the
“Second Intellectual Meeting of National Dialogue”, has come under
fire from some Saudi scholars.
The
resentment of the scholars stems from the fact that the research
undermines the principles of the Wahhabi Doctrine, upon which the
legitimacy of the rule in the kingdom is based.
156
Saudi religious figures have issued a statement that warns of the
risks of modifying educational curricula, particularly religious ones,
in a response to the research submitted by Ibrahim El-Sakran and Abdel
Aziz Al-Qassem, entitled “Religious educational curricula…a
reading in how to deal with others, reality and civilization.”
The
research - a copy of which was obtained by IslamOnline.net Saturday,
January 3 - says that religious educational curricula in the kingdom
include materials that “infringe upon the rights of Muslims of
opposing opinion”, “the bases of treating non-Muslims” and the
rules of dealing with knowledge and civilizations. They also encourage
religious fanaticism, according to the research.
It
recommends reconsidering religious educational curricula to remove
parts related to political battles and disputes from such curricula
and focus only on what senior scholars have agreed upon.
It
also seeks to “deepen the concepts of legitimate human rights” and
the rules of dealing with others such as mercy and justice.
The
research also calls for “breathing balance again into religious
educational curricula so as to be suitable to the needs of the
receivers” and outlining a balanced perspective towards cultures and
knowledge.
A
Call For Radical Changes
The
research points out that achieving such a balance requires a radical
study of the methods of preparing curricula that undergo intellectual
disputes, in addition to religious and political battles that took
place during the first five centuries of Islam.
In
the meantime, it criticizes such curricula for ignoring contemporary
issues such as basic human rights, legitimate freedoms. Ignoring such
issues, according to the research, has led to disregarding the
expression of opinion in a civilized way, resulting in different kinds
of social disputes.
The
research emphasizes the importance of believing in legitimate
multilateralism and building legitimate values of coexistence, loyalty
and friendliness in the new generations.
The
research warns of the glorifying presentation educational curricula
teem with at all stages in dealing with opposing opinions; a matter
that leads to legitimizing killing and blood shedding among the youth.
Methods
of Infidelity Accusations
The
research presents several methods of accusations of infidelity and
blasphemy to include those who pay visits to the tombs or get
blessings from them.
Educational
curricula do also accuse followers of modern political trends such as
liberals and socialists of blasphemy, calling for killing them, taking
their women as slaves and looting their properties, as per the
research.
In
reply to this research, 156 Saudi religious figures have issued a
statement that warns of the risks stemming from the ‘reform’ of
educational curricula, particularly religious curricula, according to
the London-based Al-Hayat newspaper Saturday January 3.
The
statement warns of the dangers of any step taken by the government to
modify or develop religious curricula, pointing out that this
modification will be the first step towards corruption; a matter that
requires a firm stand and undermines the principles of the Wahhabi
Doctrine, upon which the legitimacy of the rule in the kingdom is
based.
It
is worth noting that the recommendations of the second intellectual
meeting held last week was referred to the Saudi crown prince Abdullah
bin Abdul Aziz Saturday January 3.
Most
signatories are Salafis, including Dr. Nasser Al-Omr, Sheikh Abdullah
bin Habrin, Sheikh Abdel Rahman Nasser Al-Barrak, Sheikh Abdullah bin
Hamoud Al-Tuweigry, Dr. Safar Al-Hawaly and Hamad Al-Sulaifeih,
according to Al-Hayat Arabic daily.
Al-Awagy
has underlined that he supports modifying educational curricula
without exception, as they are not among fixed assets of religion,
pointing out that changes should be based on external dictations.
The
statement has been presented to both Sheikh Salman Al-Awda and Abdul
Wahab Al-Tariri, who refused to sign it for unknown reasons, given
that Al-Awda was one of the participants in the national dialogue in
Makkah, according to Al-Hayat.
Voices
of those calling for reform in Saudi Arabia have increased, following
the attacks on some housing complexes in Riyadh on May 12, 2003, that
led to 35 deaths, including eight U.S. citizens.
In
response to reform pressures, Riyadh has set up “King Abdul Aziz’s
Center for National Dialogue” that organized both intellectual
meetings for national dialogue and pledged to hold municipal elections
in 2004, followed by similar elections for local councils and the
Shura Council within two and three years respectively.