"If
the situation allowed our Self-Defense Forces to participate, they
could go at any time... Unfortunately, it is not such a
situation," Chief Cabinet Secretary Yasuo Fukuda said in press
statements carried by Agence France-Presse (AFP).
"They
may discuss in detail how (Japanese troops) will be received. We need
information from various angles," Fakuda said.
Only
hours before the attack in Nasiriyah, Tokyo had issued its strongest
public message to date that it planned to send troops later this year.
"We
are firm in our thinking that we will have a dispatch this year,"
Fukuda said Wednesday, November 12.
The
top government spokesman insisted Thursday "our way of thinking
hasn't changed".
Prime
Minister Junichiro Koizumi, a staunch supporter of the invasion of
Iraq and the subsequent occupation, received parliamentary approval
last July to send up to 1,000 troops to Iraq.
But
the BBC NewsOnline correspondent said that that since then, as the
security situation has deteriorated, an already uneasy Japanese public
has turned against the policy.
The
proposed area of deployment for the Japanese troops was Nasiriyah, the
scene of Wednesday's bombing on the Italian forces.
Japan's
constitution bans its forces from engaging in offensive operations.
Koizumi’s
support for the Iraq invasion also bore the brunt on ballot boxes,
with the opposition Democratic Party gained 40 seats after campaigning
against the deployment in last week’s general elections.
The
delay also came much to the embarrassment of U.S. Defense Secretary of
State Donald Rumsfeld, expected here a few hours later in the day for
what he said discussing ways to "adjust our alliance" and
about the two countries' cooperation in Afghanistan and Iraq.
South
Korea Agrees Limited Deployment
Further
to Washington’s disappointment, South Korean President Roh Moo-Hyun
agreed to dispatch no more than 3,000 troops to Iraq.
The
United States has reportedly asked South Korea for more than 5,000
combat troops.
Roh
instructed his security ministers on Tuesday to prepare for a
deployment that "should not exceed 3,000" in size,
presidential spokesman Yoon Tae-Young said on Thursday.
Roh
agreed on October 18 to a U.S. request to send troops to Iraq but
until now has declined to put a figure on the deployment.
The
decision was announced three days ahead of Rumsfeld’s visit, on his
first trip to South Korea since his appointment as U.S. defense
secretary in 2001.
Earlier
this week Rumsfeld called on allies to supply "a lot of
troops" for duty in Iraq, rocked by increasingly active
opposition to U.S.-led occupation forces.
But
the U.S. request for additional South Korean troops has split public
opinion and triggered pro- and anti-troop dispatch demonstrations in
the country.
Roh
recently spoke of his personal "agony" in considering the
request and has sent two fact-finding missions to Iraq to survey the
risks South Korean troops would face.
Rumsfeld
will meet with Roh and top officials to discuss the troop dispatch
issue and also a year-long standoff over North Korea's nuclear weapons
ambitions, as observers said that the U.S. official would exercise
pressures on the head of the country that host 37,000 troops.
Philippines
Committed
 |
|
Roh instructed to prepare for a deployment that "should not exceed 3,000" in size
|
In
the meanwhile, the Philippines said it "is committed to continue
its support to the coalition operations in Iraq".
However,
reiterating that it would "maintain its humanitarian presence in
Iraq," the Asian country’s officials said the government would
be briefed by the head of the Filipino contingent on the situation
there this week.
A
total of 178 Filipino soldiers, policemen and social and health
workers are serving in areas in southern Iraq administered by Polish
forces, and the government had earlier said it would increase the size
of the contingent to 500 by early next year.
‘Open
Eyes’
Meanwhile,
Rumsfeld appeared of the dangers facing foreign forces in Iraq, saying
that countries making military contribution in the war-ravaged country
should do so "with their eyes open".
"It's
been a violent country for a long time and it very likely will be for
a long time. Certainly people need to participate there with their
eyes open”.
"It's
a dangerous country, it's a violent country," he said.
He
said remnants of the former regime of Saddam Hussein were
"purposefully targeting people in an attempt to get them to leave
so they can take back that country”.
Although
Washington blames the rising attacks on the former regime’s
remnants, feelings of frustrations and deep resentment are rising
among ordinary Iraqis jeered by the continued occupation as well as
the U.S. military provocations as random shootings and mass detention
of innocent civilians.