Your Mail

ÚŃČí

 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 

U.S. Court Asked To 'Clear Stand' On Guantanamo

"We are expecting the Supreme Court to take a stand. It could be in the next few days," Ratner

WASHINGTON, November 9 (Islamonline.net & News Agencies) - U.S. human rights activists demanded Sunday, November 9, the U.S. Supreme Court to show "where it stands" on civil liberties, asking it either to weigh in soon on the legality of holding hundreds of people in the notorious U.S. naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, or to remain silent.

The plaintiffs, including human rights organizations, diplomats, former judges and retired military officers, believe the high court should step in and declare that President George W. Bush's administration is denying justice to approximately 650 men from 42 countries held prisoners by the United States at the military camp, reported Agence France-Presse (AFP).

A ruling or silence from the Court "will be an important statement either way," said lawyer Ira Robbins.

"At least we will find out where the court stands and maybe they will make an important statement protecting civil liberties," argued Robbins, who is also an expert on the Supreme Court.

Michael Ratner, a lawyer with the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), said the court should deliver its judgment in the next few days.

"We are expecting the Supreme Court to take a stand. It could be in the next few days," said Ratner, a famous human rights attorney.

They believe that Bush administration's abuse of civil liberties under the pretext of the so called "war on terrorism" will eventually affect all Americans.

The CCR has unsuccessfully argued in federal courts that the detainees have a right to a lawyer and to appear before a judge.

Federal courts have said that detainees at Guantanamo do not have the same legal rights as prisoners held in the United States due to the legal status and location of the base.

'Silent'

Even if the nine justices of the Supreme Court decide to consider the matter, it is difficult to predict how they will respond.

Chief Justice William Rehnquist's book "All The Laws But One," 1998, advocating the limitation of civil liberties during wartime, is a case in point.

The U.S. highest court may choose to remain silent, as it did during World War II, refusing to make a statement on the detention of Japanese and Japanese-Americans detained in prison camps in the United States.

The Bush administration claims that the Guantanamo prisoners, most of them captured in Afghanistan and Pakistan after the September 11, 2001 attacks, are "illegal combatants," not protected as prisoners of war (PoWs) under the Geneva Conventions.

A series of cases have now been filed with the Supreme Court on behalf of 16 of the prisoners, including Kuwaitis, Australian and British nationals.

Mohammad Sagheer, the first Pakistani released from Guantanamo filed suit against the United States for $10.4 million in compensation for the "torture and humiliation" he faced in detention.

Similar accusations were filed also form an Australian Lawyer, Richard Bourke, who accused the United States of using "old-fashioned" torture techniques to force confessions out of prisoners at the Guantanamo military camp.

Many international rights organizations, including the U.S.-based Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, had frequently called on the Bush administration to investigate and address charges of torture of those detainees or risk criminal prosecution.

Back To News Page

News Archive :
Day:   Month: Year:   

Send Mail

Related Links


News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Politics In Depth | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map