"Your
withdrawal from our country is unavoidable, if not today then
tomorrow… Our aim is not to kill more children of the peoples of
America, Britain or elsewhere," said the more than 20-minute
message.
It
also offered withdrawal negotiations with members of the previous
government who are in U.S. custody, reported Agence France-Presse (AFP).
"If
you want to negotiate the modalities of the pullout ... you can open a
dialogue with officials from the Iraqi leadership who are held by your
army as prisoners of war," the voice said.
The
speaker, who signed off with "mid-September", urged Iraqis to
continue to fight against the U.S.-led occupation.
"You
must tighten the noose and increase your strikes against the enemies by
demonstrating, writing on walls and demanding your rights ... and above
all through armed struggle."
He
accused U.S. President George Bush and his administration of
"lying" about Iraq’s alleged possession of weapons of mass
destruction.
"I
tell Bush, in the name of the Iraqi people, 'you lied to yourself, to
your people and the whole world.'"
The
voice called on the U.N. Security Council and Arab countries to review
their positions on Iraq.
He
lashed out at the United Nations for being led by the "unjust"
United States.
"Know
that Iraq and its leaders will refuse any solution that is made while
the country is under the shadow of occupation. We will consider it to be
a ruse," the voice assured.
CIA
analysts, for their part, have not yet determined whether it is
authentic, a U.S. intelligence official said.
"We
are aware of the audio tape purported to be that of Saddam Hussein and a
technical analysis is underway to determine the authenticity of the
tape," said the official, who asked not to be identified.
"It
is premature at this point to reach any conclusions or determine whether
it is or is not his voice," the official added.
CIA
had, in the past, confirmed the authentic of previous audio and video
tapes of the ousted Iraqi president.
WMD
Destroyed
In
a related development, former U.N. chief weapons inspector Hans Blix
said Wednesday Saddam had probably destroyed his prohibited weapons ten
years ago but pretended otherwise to deter any attack.
"I'm
certainly more and more to the conclusion that Iraq has, as they
maintained, destroyed almost all of what they had in the summer of
1991," he told Australian national radio.
U.N.
inspectors worked in Iraq for several months in late 2002 and early 2003
and failed to find conclusive evidence of the alleged WMD.
Their
absence has become a major embarrassment for the United States and its
allies, who used it to justify their invasion in March, AFP reported.
Asked
if it was likely Iraq has not had WMD for at least a decade, he said:
"Yup, that's right."
"You
see, if they didn't have anything after '91, there must be some
explanation why they behaved as they did. They certainly gave the
impression that they were denying access and so forth," Blix said.
"I
mean, you can put up a sign on your door, Beware of the Dog, without
having a dog."
Blix
pointed out that the rhetoric of official descriptions of the hunt for
weapons had been progressively weakened, doubting that any would now be
found.
"The
more time that has passed, the more I think it's unlikely that anything
will be found," he said.
"In
the beginning they talked about weapons concretely, and later on they
talked about weapons programs, and maybe they'll find some documents of
interest but that should have surfaced and, I think, explained."
Blix's
suggestions, which he said were already known in the United States,
called into question controversial intelligence used by Britain and the
United States to justify the war.
On
December 7 last year, Iraq made a submission to the United Nations in
which it said it did not have chemical, biological or nuclear weapons.
It
was quickly dismissed as false and incomplete by the United States and
Britain, which accused Baghdad of failing to disarm as required by
Security Council Resolution 1441.
These
charges were later used by Washington and London to justify the invasion
of the country in late March.
Since
then, British Prime Minister Tony Blair has been under fire for
allegedly ignoring intelligence casting doubt on the case for war.
And
Australian Prime Minister John Howard this week was accused of lying
over a British intelligence report suggesting a strike on Baghdad would
increase the likelihood of terrorist attacks against Western targets.
U.S.
officials have also been increasingly keen to downplay the significance
of the search for weapons in Iraq.
The
U.S.-controlled Iraq Survey Group has been scouring the country for
evidence of the alleged WMD, but its hundreds of scientists have found
nothing.