 |
|
"What I am resisting is any suggestion that there was some sort of conspiracy," Hoon
|
LONDON,
August 27 (IslamOnline.net & News Agencies) – British Defense
Ministry Geoff Hoon said on Wednesday, August 27, that there was no
"conspiracy" to name weapons expert David Kelly as the
source of a report that Britain doctored evidence of Iraq's alleged
weapons of mass destruction to further make the case of invading it.
Distancing
himself from the controversial outing of Kelly, Hoon told a judicial
inquiry into the respected scientist's presumed suicide that he was
not involved in the decision to announce that an official had come
forward, saying that was made by Cabinet office officials.
Hoon,
the first minister to appear before the inquiry, claimed that he had
not seen a document drawn up by the Ministry of Defense's director of
news, Pam Teare, that allowed staff to confirm Kelly's identity to
journalists.
"I
would not expect to be consulted about that kind of material,"
Hoon was quoted by Agence France-Presse (AFP) as saying at the inquiry
headed by Lord Brian Hutton, which is to hear Thursday, August 28,
from Prime Minister Tony Blair.
"What
I am resisting is any suggestion that there was some sort of
conspiracy, some sort of strategy, some sort of plan covertly to make
his name known," he said.
"That
was not the case," said Hoon.
"My
concern was to identify the key facts, whether Doctor Kelly was or was
not (BBC journalist) Andrew Gilligan's single source,"
said Hoon, adding that he only knew for sure that Kelly was the source
after the fact was confirmed by the BBC following his death.
Kelly
was found dead with a slit wrist in woods near his home in the English
countryside on July 18, a week after the Ministry of Defense's press
office confirmed he had been the BBC's source.
Gilligan's
radio report on May 29 - based on an off-the-record interview with
Kelly - claimed that Downing Street had "sexed up" a
September 2002 dossier on Iraq and weapons of mass destruction to
justify Britain joining the U.S.-led Iraq invasion.
The
50-page document - which notably claimed that Iraq could deploy
chemical or biological weapons in as little as 45 minutes - was a key
part of Blair's attempts to persuade a skeptical British public to
back the war.
'Extraordinary
Difficult'
Hoon,
whose political career is on the line over the Kelly affair, had
insisted that Kelly - a one-time U.N. arms inspector - appear before
the House of Commons foreign affairs committee, covered live on
television, over the objections of the defense ministry's top civil
servant.
Kelly
did so, three days before his body was found.
"It
would have been extraordinarily difficult to explain ... why we were
refusing permission for an official who clearly has something relevant
to say about their previous deliberations to appear before
parliament," Hoon said.
Hoon
began his testimony Wednesday by claiming that Kelly had expressed
support for the government's Iraq policy when they met in a Ministry
of Defense cafeteria in April, not long after the Iraq invasion began.
"I
did not know who it was, we talked about Iraq; we discussed the
government's policy which the official said he supported. It was not
an official occasion at all," said Hoon.
Many
analysts saw Hoon's appearance Wednesday as his make-or-break moment
in politics, amid speculation he could end up as the fall guy for the
worst crisis to hit Blair since he took office in May 1997.
Home
Secretary David Blunkett said Wednesday he was convinced the inquiry -
which Blair ordered just hours after Kelly's body was found - would
"vindicate" the government.
"
I think it will clear the air," said Blunkett during a visit to
an processing centre for asylum seekers in south London.
"Although
people are sick and tired of day-to-day wall-to-wall coverage, I think
Lord Hutton will find in a way that people can have confidence again
in the institutions of this country," he said.
Kelly's
Final Call Revealed
 |
|
Kelly was "tired" after the grilling, Clark
|
After
Hoon's evidence, details of the final hours of weapons expert David
Kelly's life have emerged at the Hutton inquiry into his death.
Wing
Commander John Clark, a colleague of the scientist, told of his
conversations with Kelly shortly before he went missing.
Clark
told the inquiry the weapons expert said he had not expected to face
the full glare of the media after coming forward to admit his meetings
with a BBC reporter.
Clark,
who shared an office with Kelly at the Ministry of Defense, said the
scientist had not been looking forward to his appearances before the
Commons foreign affairs committee and the intelligence and security
committee, BBC NewsOnline reported.
He
told the inquiry the weapons expert was "tired" after the
grilling.
"He
was asked by a colleague how he felt and he said that the pressure
associated with the hearings was worse than that associated with his
Phd".
"I
think up until then that had been the most stressful interview he had
perhaps had."
He
said that when he spoke to Dr Kelly on 17 July - the day the weapons
expert went missing from his Oxfordshire home - he was in good
spirits, but said his wife was upset.
"He
basically said he was holding up ok but it had all come to a head and
his wife had taken it really very badly," said Clark.
"Whether
that was in association with the additional pressure of having to get
back on the day before under her own steam I do not know. But he did
say that his wife had been very upset on the morning of the
17th."
Clark
told the inquiry he had asked Dr Kelly whether he had expected the
attention he received after revealing his meetings with Gilligan.
He
said Kelly had told him: "Under no circumstances."
Chairman
the Intelligence and Security Committee Ann Taylor also gave her
evidence, saying the row between the BBC and the government
over the dossier was a "marginal" issue to her committee's
inquiry.