 |
|
The U.S. administration was "protecting a foreign government," said Graham
|
Additional
Reporting By Mustafa Abdel-Halim, IOL Staff
WASHINGTON,
July 21 (IslamOnline.net & News Agencies) – A Congressional
report suggested that Saudi Arabia might have played a role in the
September 11 hijack attacks in the United States, a leading U.S.
magazine said on Monday, July 21.
The-delayed
900-page report contains "potentially explosive new evidence
suggesting that Omar al-Bayoumi, a key associate of two of the
hijackers, may have been a Saudi-government agent," sources told NewsWeek.
Al-Bayoumi,
said the report, held a meeting at the Saudi Consulate in Los Angeles
In January 2000 —and then went directly to a restaurant where he met
future hijackers Khalid Almihdhar and Nawaf Alhazmi, whom he took back
with him to San Diego, it said.
"Al-Bayoumi
later arranged for the men to get an apartment next to his and fronted
them their first two months rent."
The
report criticized that the Federal Bureau of Investigations never kept
tabs on Al-Bayoumi despite receiving prior information he was a secret
Saudi agent.
But
furious bureau officials say the report misstates the evidence and
that the bureau checked out Al-Bayoumi—now back in Saudi
Arabia—and concluded he had not given the hijackers “material
support.”
As
for Almihdhar and Alhazmi, “there was nothing there that gave us any
suspicion about these guys,” said one FBI official to Newsweek.
Gamal
Khashashqi, a former editor-in-chief of Saudi paper Al-Watan,
also argued the Newsweek report is "false".
"Such
reports are rather an attempt to destroy relations between the two
countries and demonize the kingdom by some far-right parties in the
United States," Khashashqi told IslamOnline.net.
He
said that Saudi Arabia is expected to press for verifying the alleged
report, as Riyadh is "a key state in the region and that ties
with Washington "would be still strong."
Newsweek
had earlier claimed in another
report that money was sent, via the bank account of Princess
Haifa Al-Faisal, wife of Saudi Ambassador to the United States Prince
Bandar bin Sultan, to two college students in southern California who
closely aided two of the September 11 airplane hijackers.
'Crucial'
Also,
the American magazine quoted the congressional report as saying that
the Pentagon was slammed for resisting military strikes against
Al-Qaeda camps in Afghanistan prior to 9-11, and the CIA for failing
to pass along crucial information about Almihdhar and Alhazmi at a
terrorists’ summit in Malaysia.
"A
few months after al-Bayoumi took them to San Diego, Almihdhar and
Alhazmi moved into the house of a local professor who was a longtime
FBI “asset.” And had earlier contact with another hijacker, Hani
Hanjour."
But
even though the informant was in regular touch with his FBI handler,
the bureau never pieced together that he was living with terrorists,
said the report.
It
added the bureau also failed to pursue other leads, including a local
imam who dealt with several key 9-11 figures.
"The
report, one congressional investigator said, “is a scathing
indictment of the FBI as an agency that doesn’t have a clue about
terrorism.”
'Protection'
The
report is sure to reignite questions about whether some Saudi
officials were secretly monitoring the hijackers—or even
facilitating their conduct, said Newsweek.
Questions
about the Saudi role arose repeatedly during last year’s joint
House-Senate intelligence-committees inquiry, but the Bush
administration has refused to declassify many key passages of the
committees’ findings.
The
Bush administration refused to declassify several key passages from
the 900-page report, including a 28-page section that outlines the
role played by Riyadh, removed from the final version, Newsweek
claims.
Senator
Bob Graham, a Democratic candidate for the 2004 presidential elections
who supervised the inquiry maintains that the U.S. administration was
"protecting a foreign government," according to Newsweek.
An
attorney for victims of the attacks who are suing a group of suspected
financiers of Al-Qaeda, Jean-Charles Brisard, said the report shows
that "at each stage in the preparation of the attacks" Saudi
Arabia operated as an effective financial and logistical
"patron" to the terrorists.
Brisard
said the Saudi government had thus been an essential "cog"
in the attacks' successfully being perpetrated.
He
added that certain parts of the report mention "help provided by
Saudi diplomats working
in Washington to assist in several suicide (hijackers)' arrival and
stay in the United States."
Last
week, Senator Richard Shelby told CNN that declassified
information in the report would "shed some light, maybe not all
the light" on the attacks.
"...
I can tell you this, there are a lot of high people in Saudi Arabia,
over the years, that have aided and abetted Osama bin Laden and his
group," Shelby said, alleging the Saudis had done so via
charities as well as directly.
Saudi
officials has vehemently denied any connection between the royal
family and suspected September 11 hijackers, with Saudi foreign
minister said he hoped
"accusations in the United States about the responsibility of
Saudi Arabia in the 9/11 tragedy will cease,"
Relations
between Saudi Arabia and the U.S have strained, as Washington ordered
diplomats of all U.S. embassy and consular personnel to leave the
kingdom after the devastating triple
bombings in Riyadh in May 2003 – in which eight Americans
were killed.
The
kingdom faced a barrage of criticisms from the United States that it
did too little to prevent after Washington had sent a presidential
envoy to warn the kingdom of an imminent attack.