 |
|
"I
think describing it as guerrilla tactics being employed against us
is ... proper ... in strictly military terms," Abizaid
|
WASHINGTON,
July 17 (IslamOnline.net & News Agencies) – The new commander of
the U.S. occupation forces in Iraq warned Wednesday, July 16, that any
soldier who criticized U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld would
face “possible verbal reprimand or something more stringent” from
his commanders, as he admitted that these troops face “guerrilla”
war in Iraq.
General
John Abizaid’s comments came as a group of soldiers aired their
concerns on U.S. television, speaking of poor morale and
disillusionment with Rumsfeld as well as complained of uncertainty of
when they are returning home, said Reuters on its website.
Abizaid
said American forces were now engaged in guerrilla war in Iraq and
must adapt their tactics to crush an increasingly organized,
cell-based resistance spearheaded by Saddam loyalists.
He
told a Pentagon briefing the Iraqis "are conducting what I would
describe as a classical guerrilla-type campaign against us. It's
low-intensity conflict in our doctrinal terms, but it's war however
you describe it.
"The
level of resistance ... is getting more organized and it is learning.
It is adapting. ... And we've got to adapt to their tactics,
techniques and procedures."
Abizaid
said U.S. troops should be prepared for yearlong deployments in Iraq,
a staple of the Vietnam War but used only rarely since then.
The
White House downplayed reports of slumping morale among U.S. troops in
Iraq with rising anti-American sentiments and almost daily attacks on
them.
"The
troops recognize that what they are doing is very important: Helping
secure and stabilize Iraq so that it can move towards freedom and
democracy," said Scott McClellan, chief spokesman for U.S.
President George W. Bush.
"We
will continue to make sure they have all the resources and support
they need as they do their job," he said.
The
U.S. occupation forces are
on high alert Thursday, July 17 on the anniversary of the 1968
seizure of power by Saddam Hussein's Baath party,
the new head of Central command said acknowledging that his troops are
facing a classic guerrilla war.
"We're
seeing a cellular organization of six to eight people armed with
(rocket propelled grenades), machine guns, etc., attacking us at some
times and places of their choosing," General Abizaid told
reporters here on Wednesday.
"I
think describing it as guerrilla tactics being employed against us is
... proper ... in strictly military terms," said Abizaid, who took
over from General Tommy Franks, who headed the Central Command
before and during the invasion.
His
comments contradicted Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who said
on June 30 that it was not "anything like a guerrilla war or
an organized resistance."
U.S.
President George W. Bush warned
in June 2003 that the U.S. forces in Iraq were facing a future of
"danger and sacrifice”, while his Secretary of State Colin
Powell urged the American people to "demonstrate the
patience and the understanding of the situation."
‘Soon”
Abizaid
said everyone had hoped for the U.S. forces’ return "relatively
soon", along with troops from the First Marine Division
"provided certain expectations were ... met on the security
front," Abizaid said.
"Once
we started to understand that environment, we knew that we were going
to have to extend people longer than we had hoped," he said.
On
Tuesday, July 15, the U.S. Third Infantry Division was unexpectedly
ordered to remain in place, its scheduled return to the United
States postponed due to the rising attacks on the U.S. forces in Iraq.
He
stressed the decision to remain was a tactical one and was not being
forced on the U.S. military.
Abizaid
said U.S. troops should be prepared for yearlong deployments in Iraq,
a staple of the Vietnam War but used only rarely since then.
The
death of a U.S. soldier in
an attack Wednesday on a military convoy was the 147th since U.S.
forces invaded Iraq March 20, equaling the number of U.S. dead in the
1990-1991 Gulf War and raising alarm about the occupation's high cost
in American lives.