 |
|
Basyir charged testimony against him from broad destroyed his “hopes for an objective trial” and violated his human rights
|
By
Kazi Mahmood, IOL Southeast Asia Correspondent
JAKARTA,
July 4 (IslamOnline.net) - In a controversial teleconference from the
police headquarters in Malaysia, alleged Jemaah Islamiah (JI) members
implicated Abu Bakar Basyir of being the leader of the group and
argued he was aware of its activities, while a leader of the
Mujahideen Council of Indonesia (MMI) told IslamOnline.net it was only
a plot to undermine Basyir.
During
a video link conference, four detained alleged members of the JI in
Malaysia and three in Singapore claimed Basyir led the group since
1999 and approved a number of its attacks in south-east Asia.
They
said Basyir, high on U.S., Singapore and Malaysia’s lists of
suspected terrorists, had plotted to bomb churches in Indonesia and
sent fighters to the Malukus, the southern Philippines and Thailand.
Basyir,
arrested
by Indonesian police on October 19 amid protests by hundreds of his
supporters, is now tried on charges of having perpetrated a series of church
bombing on Christmas Eve 2000
in Indonesia that killed 19.
Plotted
Ageing
Basyir, 64, condemned the use of witnesses testifying against him from
abroad, saying it destroyed his 'hopes for an objective trial' and
violated his human rights, reported the Jakarta post on Friday,
July 04.
A
MMI leader, calling himself Sheikh Abdullah, told IOL that Basyir
repudiated the accusations, asserting the whole episode was a plot to
undermine the man, who is currently in jail in Jakarta.
“We
have our own intelligence information that shows it’s the U.S. that
has ordered the Megawati Sukarnoputri regime to keep Basyir behind
bars by all means, and the use of the video link from Singapore and
Malaysia is one of the unconventional means,” said the MMI leader
who did not want his real name revealed or his picture taken.
Basyir,
who run a school in Ngruki, Solol, that
had
around 2000 students from
around the world, has challenged the U.S. and Indonesia to prove he
was a terrorist as they claim.
“It
is impossible to substantiate the claims made by the 7 alleged JI
members from Malaysia and Singapore, since we are not able to talk to
them and we can only hear what they have to say,” Sheikh Abdullah
told IOL.
He
added that it was unfair and against the spirit of the law to allow
any one to accuse someone like Basyir without them bringing any
concrete proof.
Sheikh
Abdullah maintained that the case against Basyir rests on hearsay
evidence and flimsy accusations by people who do not even know the
man.
“As
far as I know and I can ascertain this is the truth: Basyir never
condoned any one to commit acts of violence and even sent a memo to
all the members of the MMI and groups associated with it not to
indulge in bombings or killings of westerners as these would be
detrimental to the image of Islam,” he told IOL.
Machiavellian
The
MMI leader charged it was obvious that a Machiavellian plan against
Basyir and Muslims of good reputation was being plotted in the South
East Asian region, citing the arrest of a school owner and his son in
Thailand and the corroboration of charges against Basyir by the U.S
and its allies in the region.
He
referred to rumors that Basyir will be jailed for 15 years upon these
testimonies and for the alleged violation of the Indonesian
immigration laws.
The
teleconference is not the first that has raised the hue and cry of
defense lawyers who refused to be at the court on Thursday to listen
to the testimony of the alleged JI members without being able to cross
examine them.
The
lawyers said last week during a similar teleconference from Singapore
that the court should not allow such testimonies, which are biased and
one sided.
Nonetheless,
the video link from Kuala Lumpur helped built the case of the
prosecution against Basyir.
The
testimony also destroyed any chances that Basyir had to fight for his
freedom and to restore his name, said the MMI leader who blamed the
Indonesian judiciary for allowing the teleconference.
Many
Indonesian Muslims had rejected what they called
injustice
in the case of Basyir, as it had rested on the sole testimony of the
so-called “CIA agent” Umar Al-Faruq, an Iraqi who said he was of
Yemeni origin and held Indonesian identity before his extradition to
the United States in June 2002.