 |
|
General
Baluyevsky said "the resistance in Iraq is not
terrorism"
|
WASHINGTON,
July 2 (IslamOnline.net & News Agencies) - With mounting Iraqi
resistance attacks, a top Russian general warned Wednesday, July 2,
the U.S. is in danger of getting bogged down in another Vietnam in
Iraq, though President George W. Bush insisted mounting attacks would
not "shake our resolve on terror."
As
if answering Bush, Russian Deputy Chief of Staff General Yury
Baluyevsky stressed that "the resistance in Iraq is not
terrorism."
He,
however, expressed conviction that the U.S.-led occupation forces in
Iraq would be able to halt the resistance by killing ousted president
Saddam Hussein, reported Agence France-Presse (AFP).
The
Russian top brass was doubtful there were any members of the al-Qaeda
in Iraq and that resistance attacks were being carried out by diehards
from the ousted Baath regime.
He
said that the situation in postwar Iraq was not easy and that is why
"the United States and Britain are putting pressure on other NATO
members to get involved in Iraq."
"I
don't envy the Polish," he added, referring to Warsaw, a key
European supporter of the U.S.-led invasion which has been given
command of a multinational stabilization force in one sector of Iraq,
alongside some 150,000 U.S. and 12,000 British troops.
U.S.
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld rebuffed Tuesday, July 1, reports
Iraq was becoming a quagmire,
struggling to defeat perceptions that the occupation of Iraq has
reached a cul-de-sac.
Rumsfeld
said American troops in Iraq would not be deterred by any
"hostile" actions to stop them and insisted on efforts to
pacify and stabilize Iraq.
Meanwhile,
a group of U.S. senators in Baghdad warned that Iraq war is not over
yet and the American public must know U.S. troops have a long struggle
ahead of them.
The
four Republicans and five Democrats were briefed by the U.S. civilian
administrator in Iraq, Paul Bremer, and senior military officials on
security in Iraq.
"The
major combat is over. But for the individual soldiers and groups of
soldiers, the war is still on. The risks are still there and
casualties could well be taken," Armed Services Committee
chairman Republican Senator John Warner told reporters.
'Open-Ended
Mission'
Bush,
however, sought to shore up support for what he warned would be the
open-ended U.S. mission in Iraq.
With
opinion polls showing falling support for the campaign in Iraq and
Congress expressing growing criticism over the toll on U.S. troops,
Bush said: "The rise of Iraq as an example of moderation and
democracy and prosperity is a massive and long-term undertaking.
"Our
goal is a swift transition to Iraqi control of their own affairs. The
people of Iraq will be secure, and the people of Iraq will run their
own country," he said Tuesday, July 1.
Bush
did not comment on calls to send more U.S. troops to Iraq to quell
unrest nor did he set out a deadline for the return of the roughly
150,000 troops sent there.
The
U.S. president also blamed Saddam loyalists groups, and even
"foreign fighters" for spiraling attacks against American
troops.
"They
have attacked coalition forces and they're trying to intimidate Iraqi
citizens," he said.
"These
groups believe they have found an opportunity to harm America, to
shake our resolve in the war on terror, and to cause us to leave Iraq
before freedom is fully established. They are wrong, and they will not
succeed," said Bush.
He
warned
on June 21 that the U.S. forces in Iraq were facing a future of
"danger and sacrifice.
"The
men and women of our military face a continuing risk of danger and
sacrifice in Iraq," Bush said in his weekly radio address.
Echoing
the same statements, U.K. Foreign Secretary Jack Straw has vowed
Wednesday to keep forces in Iraq "for as long as it takes,"
the BBC News Online said.
Flying
into the Iraqi capital Baghdad, Straw said the latest attacks had
increased London and Washington's determination to root out remnants
of Saddam Hussein's regime.
"People
are making a terrible mistake if they think we are going to run away
from this - that is not the way the British forces operate. We have a
responsibility in any event to secure this country," he said.
'Stretching
Truth'
In
another development, a new poll conducted by the University of
Maryland found Wednesday that 52 percent of respondents believe Bush
and his aides were "stretching the truth" about Iraq’s
alleged chemical, biological and nuclear programs.
As
a result, 63 percent of American now believe the U.S. Congress should
investigate intelligence agencies to find out how they came up with
information about the alleged Iraqi arsenal, the survey found.
Similarly,
56 percent of those polled believed the administration stretched the
truth or made outright false statements about Hussein's ties to
al-Qaeda.
Only
32 percent said they thought the government was being "fully
truthful" about the Iraqi arsenal.
Another
10 percent said U.S. officials were presenting Congress, the American
public and the international community "evidence they knew was
false," indicated the survey which was made public Tuesday.
By
contrast, 29 percent of respondents -- up from 22 percent in May --
now say the United States was wrong in starting the war.
The
nationwide survey of 1,051 people was conducted from June 18 to 25 and
had a margin of error of 3.5 percent.
Another
poll indicated the steady dose of bad news coming from Iraq was eroding
public American support for the Iraq war.
Only
56 percent of respondents in the U.S.A. Today/CNN/Gallup poll said
Iraq was worth going to war over, down from 73 percent in April.
The
U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee agreed on June 20 to
broaden the scope of its probe into Iraq’s alleged weapons of mass
destruction and whether intelligence had been manipulated to justify
war.
The
weapons of mass destruction -- as well as the Iraqi government's
alleged ties to the al-Qaeda terrorist group -- which the
administration claimed represented an immediate threat to the Unites
States, served as the chief rationale for launching the
March 20 invasion of the country.
But
more than three months since the start of the war, U.S. troops have
yet to find any of the suspected weapons, putting the U.S. credibility
on the line.