GAZA,
June 30 (IslamOnline.net) - Recalling the failure of similar earlier
initiatives to end the daily Israeli aggressions, Palestinian people
responded to the truce declared by Palestinian factions on Sunday, June
29, with mixed feelings.
"Calling
a truce in the region is a positive step only if it is put into
action," Suheil Abdel-Aal, a local inhabitant of the borderline
city of Rafah, told IslamOnline.net on Monday, June 30.
Aal,
whose house had been razed to ground in a fresh Israeli incursion into
the town, expected that the Israeli government would not "show
enough commitment to the one-sided truce" as was the case in
similar earlier initiatives.
"We
have suffered a lot, has it not been ripe now for spelling out an end to
this suffering?," Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, 40, lamented, with a
palpable tone of sadness.
Israeli
first response to the truce is that it would ignore it, with Israeli
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's spokesman saying, "We do not give any
value to this announcement."
Wahab
said that peace-sponsoring countries should "exercise pressure on
the Jewish state to carry out its commitments and secure Palestinians'
rights."
‘Not
For Long’
In
Gaza, the densely-populated town, many agreed if applied the declared
truce would not "drag on for long", but others hinged hope on
the initiative to put an end to daily aggressions by Israeli occupation
forces, including house demolitions, land razzings and detention
campaigns.
"We
hope the Israeli government would honor the truce and halt all of its
aggressions and destruction of our property," said Akram Falluji,
owner of a beverage factory.
Mingled
with his hopes is a fear the move would not trigger a change on the
ground.
Falluji's
beverage factory was destroyed by occupation forces, inflicting him with
a 200,000 dollars loss.
For
Randa Hammas, a worker in the private sector, the truce is "an opportunity
for Hamas and other Palestinian factions to take breath and reorder
their internal affairs," after the latest Israeli wave of
assassinations.
Israeli
army carried out several raids of Palestinian groups over the last two
weeks, leaving a number of their members and leaders dead and others
injured.
The
factions were also facing growing calls by the U.S. to have them
dismantled.
'Ink
On Paper'
Many
of the inhabitants interviewed by IslamOnline.net said the government of
Sharon is the main obstacle to setting the truce on motion.
"Israel
only uses these initiatives to win over the world public opinion, but
Sharon's government has destroyed them with its rash behavior,"
said Himdan Dabous, whose son had been shot dead by Israeli gunfire.
Like
many Palestinians, Dabous dreams of a safe life, complaining that the
Israeli government is still far away from making such dream a reality.
"The
truce is a conspiracy to end to the Palestinian Intifada against Israeli
occupation, given the current developments on the international scene
after the fall of Baghdad," he added.
"The
truce is just an ink on paper, as the Israeli government would not
comply with it," said the wife of Wael Bassouni, whose house in
Beit Hanoun was flattened by Israeli bulldozers.
"Before
they set down for talks with Israel, they should have come here,"
she added, pointing to the debris of her house.
"I
don’t care about these initiatives, what I do care about is to live in
peace and security and restore my property demolished by Israeli
forces," said Marwan Abdel-Dayem, a farm owner.
"This
truce could be a step on the right direction to remove suffering of
Palestinians," Abdel-Dayem said.
"But
would Israel make good on its commitments, this is the question."
Conditions
The
truce, declared by Hamas and Islamic Jihad, made three conditions Israel
should carry out for it to succeed.
"There
should be an immediate end to all forms of aggressions against
Palestinians, including house demolitions, land razzings,
assassinations, detentions and deportations," the factions’
statement said.
"All
of the Palestinian detainees in Israeli jails should be released, and
the Jewish state should abandon any tampering with Islamic and Christian
sacred places in general and Haram al-Shariff in particular".
"But
If Israel did not respond to these conditions, we consider ourselves
non-committed to this initiative and hold Israel responsible for
consequences," the statement said.