 |
|
Straw
and Kharrazi locked horns over the nuclear issue
|
LONDON,
June 30 (IslamOnline.net & News Agencies) – Iran renewed its
rejection to open its nuclear sites to tougher inspections,
challenging visiting British Foreign Minister Jack Straw's warning of
economic consequences on Monday, June 30, as a top Iranian official
said that the head of the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog would be soon
invited to Iran for talks aimed at solving "technical
problems" between Iran
and the IAEA.
"We
are ready for talks and co-operation. But Iran's transparency should
be reciprocated," Iranian Foreign Minister Kamal Kharrazi said at
a joint press conference in Tehran with Straw, who earlier warned him
the issue could affect Iran's relations with the European Union (EU).
Straw,
in Iran for his fourth visit in just 19 months, told the BBC in
a phone interview that "nobody knows for certain" whether
Iran had nuclear weapons, but insisted that there were no
circumstances in which Britain would agree to an attack on the
country.
"What
we, in concert with everybody else in the international community, are
proposing is that they (the Iranians) have to sign up to what is
called an additional
protocol which provides for these more intrusive
inspections," Straw was quoted by Agence France-Presse (AFP) as
saying.
"The
first consequence, obviously, if they fail to sign up, is that they
fail to make progress on a host of other issues on which they do want
progress, for example on a trade and cooperation agreement" with
the European Union.
"They
will also face, for example, a Russian Federation, which has been
cooperative with Iran on the supply of some nuclear civilian
technology, getting increasingly impatient with them," Straw
added.
The
United States accused Iran of using an atomic energy program as a
cover for the secret development of nuclear weapons. Tehran has
insisted that it is only interested in atomic energy for peaceful
purposes.
The
warning came few days after U.S. National Security Adviser Condoleezza
Rice has threatened that Washington was ready to act
alone against Iran if European countries did not cooperate in
stopping it from allegedly developing nuclear weapons.
The
trade carrot is an important incentive for Iran, which wants to
cultivate ties with Europe as a counter-balance to the U.S, the BBC
correspondent said.
No
Comparison For War
Asked
whether there were any circumstances in which Britain would agree to
an attack on Iran, Straw said, "I can conceive of no such
circumstances.
"No-one
should ever compare Iran with Iraq in terms of their political systems
or their danger."
Rice
had earlier said that Washington would
like to see a different kind of regime in Iran, the same reason
mainly used to justify the invasion of Iraq along with the accusations
of possessing weapons of mass destruction.
Senior
U.S. government official John Bolton had also warned that the U.S. is
going to use
force to eliminate chemical, biological and nuclear weapons and
take away these deadly arsenals from rogue
states,
which includes Iran.
'Double
Standards'
Kharazi
bluntly replied that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
would not be allowed a tougher mandate here unless the international
community first made its own concessions to Iran.
"When
Iran is going to take positive steps, it is our right to expect
positive steps from others," Kharazi said.
While
Straw hinted that that policy was now in the balance, he stopped short
of publicly issuing any ultimatum.
But
Kharazi emphasized Iran's sentiment that the pressure the Islamic
republic now finds itself under was a sign of "double
standards".
"We
have nothing to hide and will cooperate fully within the framework of
our current commitments," he asserted. "But if we are going
to sign new commitments, we need to know the implications."
Iran
has complained that fellow NPT signatories have refused to meet their
commitments on the transfer of "peaceful" nuclear
technology. Instead, all the signatories, with the exception of
Russia, have actively blocked the transfer of all nuclear technology
to Iran.
That
complaint was repeated Monday by foreign ministry spokesman Hamid-Reza
Asefi, signaling little movement in late-night talks with Straw - who
said sanctions could only be lifted after the additional protocol was
"signed, ratified and implemented".
A
top Iranian official said that the head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog
Mohamed El-Baradei would be soon be invited to the Islamic republic
for talks aimed at solving "technical problems" between the
country and the IAEA.
Human
Rights
Straw
and Kharazi also displayed their differences over human rights, with
polite but profound disagreement over the nature of the June 10-20
wave of anti-regime protests here that were met with a stiff
crackdown.
Kharazi
politely told Straw to avoid interfering in Iran's internal affairs by
supporting "rioters", saying Iran's government was
"deeply unsatisfied" with remarks by British Prime Minister
Tony Blair supporting Iranians who took to the streets.
In
response, Straw said Blair's remarks backing the demonstrators had
been misinterpreted.
"The
United Kingdom's position is to support the right of free and peaceful
assembly," he said.
Straw
was thought to have discussed Iran on Friday, June 27, with U.S.
national security adviser Condoleezza Rice.
Though
it firmly backed Bush over Iraq, Britain has so far opted for the
European approach towards Iran of engagement and dialogue.
"More
Constructive" Role
Straw
last traveled to Iran in October 2002, when the U.S.-led invasion of
Iraq was looking increasingly imminent. Then he sought to secure a
minimum of Iranian cooperation with the invading forces.
Diplomats
said Straw - who met with President Mohammad Khatami and national
security council chief Hassan Rowhani on Monday - would now be asking
Iran to use its influence with Iraqi Shiite Muslim groups to play a
"more constructive" role in the post-war reconstruction
effort.
And
in contrast to senior U.S. officials who have accused the Islamic
republic of attempting to undermine the U.S.-British military presence
in the country, Straw said he was "broadly satisfied" with
Iran's conduct in neighboring Iraq.