Your Mail

ÚŃČí

 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 

Search »

Advanced Search »

 

Blix Questions Credibility Of U.S.-British Inspectors

Anybody who functions under an army of occupation cannot have the same credibility as an independent inspector, Blix

UNITED NATIONS, June 6 (IslamOnline.net & News Agencies) - Chief U.N. arms inspector Hans Blix on Thursday, June 5, cast doubt on the authority of the U.S.-British experts searching for weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq, as a U.S. Senator welcomed calls for a congressional probe into U.S. troops' not having found WMD in Iraq and called into question President George W. Bush's "truthfulness" on the matter.

"I do not want to question the integrity or the professionalism of the inspectors of the coalition, but anybody who functions under an army of occupation cannot have the same credibility as an independent inspector," Blix told reporters after addressing the U.N. Security Council.

The former Swedish foreign minister admitted that he felt "disappointed" at the way the United States and Britain started the war without letting his U.N. Monitoring and Verification Commission finish its work.

The United States and Britain has refused to let U.N. inspectors back into Iraq since the fall of Saddam Hussein on April 9.

But they have been unable to produce evidence of the chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs they used to justify the invasion and have sent hundreds of "extra experts" to Iraq to step up the hunt.

After failing to locate or even find a solid evidence that alleged WMD exist, the group directing all known U.S. search efforts in Iraq are ready to leave, a leading U.S. paper reported on Sunday, May 11.

Blix gave what he predicted would be his final report on Iraq to the Security Council. The 75-year-old official is expected to stand down at the end of the month.

He told council members "there remain long lists of items unaccounted for" in the nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs which Iraq claimed to have dismantled more than a decade ago.

"But it is not justified to jump to the conclusion that something exists just because it is unaccounted for," he said adding that the U.N. Monitoring and Verification Commission should still have a role in Iraq.

The UNMOVIC chairman was asked by reporters whether he felt betrayed by the U.S. decision to start the war while inspections were still going.

"Betrayal is not the right word," he replied. "I felt some disappointment, but I felt that in some months we could have come further."

He said it was "a business that was not finished."

"It is important to retain the view we all want to see the truth on the situation in Iraq. We wish the inspectors and the people who are there the best of luck. They have not found very much so far."

Blix also expressed the hope that UNMOVIC would be used in other places apart from Iraq. He said members of the Security Council shared his hopes.

"We also discussed the potential use of a body like UNMOVIC which has trained inspectors and has capabilities in the area of biology and missiles which no other organization has at the present time," he declared.

"Truthfulness" Of U.S. President On The Line

Rumsfeld insisted the intelligence was "good," and promised that Powell's testimony "will be proved right"

Senator Robert Byrd -- one of the most outspoken critics of U.S. policy in Iraq -- welcomed calls Thursday for a congressional probe into U.S. troops' not having found weapons of mass destruction there, and called into question President George W. Bush's "truthfulness" on the matter.

"What amazes me is that the president himself is not clamoring for an investigation," Byrd said from the floor of the Senate.

"It is his truthfulness that is being questioned. It is his integrity that is on the line," the West Virginia Democrat said.

"Yet he has raised no question, expressed no curiosity, about the strange turn of events in Iraq -- expressed no anger at the possibility that he might have been misled."

"How is it that the president who was so adamant about the dangers of WMD, has expressed no concern about the whereabouts of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?" Byrd said.

‘Good’

Nevertheless, U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld insisted the intelligence was "good," and promised Thursday that Powell's testimony "will be proved right."

U.S. pre-war intelligence on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction (WMD) was "good," Rumsfeld insisted Thursday after closed-door talks with US congressmen.

With the U.S. failure to come up with any evidence of Iraq ’s alleged weapons of mass destruction, the main pretext of the invasion, Rumsfeld said on Tuesday, May 27, that Iraq might have destroyed its WMD before the war.

Congressional panels, including the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, are to hold hearings to clarify the Iraqi WMD mystery and also to establish whether there had been political pressure on CIA analysts, as the press has alleged.

Back To News Page

News Archive :
Day:   Month: Year:   

Send Mail

Related Links


News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Politics in Depth | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map