AL-KHALIL,
June 3 (IslamOnline.net) - Palestinian politicians and analysts were
doubtful Tuesday, June 3, that the twin summits of Sharm El-Sheikh and
Aqaba would come up with any results serving the Palestinian cause,
noting that they would only reaffirm U.S. bias towards Israel.
"Hamas
rejects the U.S.-driven roadmap, because it does not even meet the
minimum of the Palestinian demands," Abdal Aziz al-Rantisi, a
senior leader of the Islamic resistance movement Hamas told
IslamOnline.net Tuesday.
"The
rubber-stamp acceptance of the roadmap by the Palestinian Authority and
participation in Sharm El-Sheikh summit signifies that the Palestinian
government will hold the door wide open for very dangerous concessions
that could lead to the loss of the Palestinian right to exist on their
homeland and kill the Palestinian cause," he warned.
On
Aqba summit between U.S. President George W. Bush, Palestinian Premiere
Mahmoud Abbas and his Israeli counterpart Ariel Sharon, Rantisi said it
would be "a stumbling block in the face of the Palestinian
Jihad," anticipating its failure "just like its previous
sisters."
The
two summits are aimed at "saving Sharon from the current limbo,
provide security and stability to the occupation, cripple the
(Palestinian) resistance and convince the Palestinian, Arab and Muslim
peoples that the dormant Mideast process has been revived, not to
mention beautifying the already tarnished U.S. image," Rantisi aid.
Killing
Intifada
The
Islamic Jihad, for its part, described the roadmap as "a security
vision to protect Israel's interests and is aimed at brining the
Intifada and resistance to a halt.
"These
meetings are a bid to nib the Intifada in the bud and killing the
Palestinian cause stone dead," Nafez Azzam, a senior Jihad leader,
told IOL.
The
Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) also echoed the
same pessimistic tone, asserting that the two summits would prove
futile.
"We
expect nothing out of the two summits. Any meetings held on the basis of
the roadmap and other similar political plans that do not stipulate full
withdrawal of Israeli occupation from the 1967 borders, establishment of
a Palestinian state with Al-Quds (occupied Jerusalem) as its capital and
the return of Palestinian refugees to return to their homeland, would
only bring more killings," Jameel Magdalawi said.
He
asserted that the Palestinian people would pursue the resistance until
defeating the occupation.
The
Democratic Front of the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP) dismissed the two
summits as a part of "a campaign of dictations imposed on
Palestinian leadership and people.
"The
roadmap is not negotiable and should be implemented as it is," Taha
Nassar, a leader of the DFLP in the West Bank, said.
American
Bias
Hani
al-Masri, director general of publications with the Palestinian
information ministry, said the Palestinian people do not want the
summiteers only pay lip service and want to see some curial steps on the
ground.
"We
hope they would not be PR meetings," said Masri.
He
believes that the two summits target "a respite," given the
latest developments in postwar Iraq, U.S. failure to find weapons of
mass destruction (WMDs) in the war-scarred country, rising Iraqi
resistance and Israeli economic and security crises.
"We
do not expect a real success (for the two summits) but the U.S.
president would not emerge from the talks empty hands," said Masri.
Secret
Understandings
Hafez
al-Barghouthi, editor-in-chief of the Palestinian Al-Haya
Al-Gadeeda newspaper, said the Palestinians want Israel to
commit itself to the provisions of the roadmap without any amendments.
Palestinians
would not accept any kind of underground Israeli-U.S. understandings
regarding the implementation of the peace plan was propagated by the
Israelis, he added.
"The
summiteers reckon that the two summits would prove successful, but the
real success would be judged on the ground and the U.S. credibility
would be put to the test," said Barghouthi.
He
asserted that the "Israelis want to win some more time until the
U.S. presidential elections when President Bush will be preoccupied with
his elections campaign and would not be able to do any thing."
Procrastination
Emad
al-Falouji, a Palestinian MP and former communications minister, said he
does not expect much from the two summits.
"The
U.S. is biased towards Israel and fully mindful of its reservations on
the roadmap, and that is why it does not lay serious pressure on Israel
to put the peace plan into effect," said Falouji.
"We
had expected tangible measures before the summits such as easing the
Israeli blockade and stopping incursions but nothing has happened."
Outgoing
Palestinian minister of negotiations, Saeb Erekat, said Palestinians
hope the roadmap would be implemented immediately without any
procrastination, noting that Sharon always seeks to "beat around
the bush."
In
exclusive statements to IOL, Erekat further hoped Palestinian officials
would not make concessions during the summits, calling on the U.S. and
the Quartet Committee to force Israel to abide by its obligations.