 |
|
Putin
and Chirac want more time for UN inspections in Iraq
|
MOSCOW,
February 13 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) - Russian Deputy Foreign
Minister Yury Fedotov dismissed reports that Iraq had developed a
ballistic missile in breach of UN resolutions, saying such armaments had
already been declared by Baghdad, news agencies reported Thursday,
February 13.
"The
systems in question are not prohibited. They were permitted by previous
decisions of the UN Security Council," the ITAR-TASS news agency
quoted the Russian diplomat as saying in New York.
Fedotov
said that tests, which were carried out by Iraq jointly with UN
inspectors, showed that the range of the Al-Samoud and Al-Fatah missiles
"exceeded by only 10-12 kilometres the permitted 150 kilometres
(about 93 miles)."
Iraq
"had declared this excess range in its December 7 report to the UN
Security Council on weapons of mass destruction," Fedotov noted.
The
situation surrounding the missiles "should be regarded not as
Iraq's violation of its disarmament commitments, but as proof of its
cooperation with the inspectors and of the fact that the inspections are
effective," he said.
The
chief UN inspector Hans Blix was told late Wednesday by a United Nations
panel of experts that Iraq's Al-Samoud missile had a range that exceeded
the 150-kilometre range limit imposed on Baghdad by the Security Council
after the Gulf War in 1991.
With
speculation high that Washington may now have the "smoking
gun" it seeks to prove claims about Iraq's pursuit of weapons of
mass destruction, British Prime Minister Tony Blair said if the
information were confirmed it would show Baghdad was still flouting UN
disarmament resolutions.
However,
Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Tareq Aziz, on a visit to Italy, denied his
country had broken the rules, saying the missiles were within UN
guidelines, had no guidance systems, and were unreliable, sometimes
falling up to 10 kilometers (six miles) short of their target.
Blix
will Friday brief the Security Council on the results of nearly three
months of inspections in a report which could provide a trigger for a
U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.
Tens
of thousands of U.S. and British troops are already in the Gulf region
as war plans advance in preparation for a showdown which many believe is
now inevitable.
France
to Stand Firm
In
another development, analysts said Thursday that France will push its
proposals for intensified weapons inspections at a key meeting of the UN
Security Council on Iraq, but is hoping to avoid a showdown with the
United States, according to Agence France-Presse (AFP).
Paris
is rallying support among Security Council members for stepped-up
inspections, with Germany, Russia and China already behind the
initiative.
Earlier
this week, Paris vetoed U.S. demands in NATO for military support for
Turkey.
France's
diplomatic maneuvers have exasperated and infuriated Washington, with
U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell accusing Paris and Berlin of trying
to get Iraqi President Saddam Hussein "off the hook" on the
disarmament issue.
However,
analysts said that France, while keen to avert a war and resolve the
Iraqi standoff by bolstering the inspections regime, was not yet ready
to provoke a confrontation with the United States in the Security
Council.
Guillaume
Parmentier, a researcher at the French Institute of International
Relations in Paris, said France had always "maintained a position
that would allow it to adapt to the circumstances as they evolve."
"They
don't want to start a war, but they can't exclude the possibility
either," said Parmentier, who is the director of the institute's
French Center on the United States.
"Little
more than a week ago, France's interest was to make it difficult, maybe
slow things down, but that eventually it would support, even participate
in a war," explained Dana Allin, a senior fellow at the
International Institute for Strategic Studies in London.
"It's
more difficult now - no question - but it would be very damaging for
France to veto a (Security Council) resolution" calling for the use
of force, Allin said.
A
French government source close to the Iraqi issue, while acknowledging
the toughening of France's stance vis-à-vis Washington, especially
within NATO, admitted: "We'll do everything to avoid using our
veto."
French
President Jacques Chirac, who has repeatedly said that war could only be
a last resort, noted Monday that he had not seen "indisputable
proof" of the existence of Iraq's alleged arsenal of weapons of
mass destruction.
But
U.S. media reports suggested that UN chief weapons inspector Hans Blix
would tell the Security Council Friday that Iraq had failed to comply
with its disarmament obligations, thereby giving Washington evidence to
back its requests for the authorization of military action.
Parmentier
predicted that the report from Blix and International Atomic Energy
Agency chief Mohamed ElBaradei would not be "black and white",
adding: "France's position would be much easier if the report were
cut and dried."
France's
intransigence, while earning Chirac high approval ratings at home, has
set off a wave of anti-French sentiment in the United States, with U.S.
lawmakers spewing vitriolic remarks and threatening trade sanctions.
When
asked about long-term damage to Franco-U.S. relations, Allin said the
biggest loser could be neither Washington nor Paris but British Prime
Minister Tony Blair, who has been U.S. President George W. Bush's
staunchest supporter despite criticism at home.
"Both
the French and the Americans are being incredibly short-sighted if they
don't understand that it's in neither of their individual interests to
see a situation that destroys Tony Blair politically," Allin
explained.
"I
think Chirac has played this very badly - I think the arguments pro and
con for a war are a really close call," he added.
The
researcher said the current Franco-U.S. rift was "not out of scale
with past disagreements," explaining that Paris and Washington had
to decide "whether to live to be allies another day, or to stoke up
the disgust. And this (Bush) administration seems to be doing the
latter."