GENEVA,
December 21 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) - The United States
Saturday, December 21, blocked an international agreement to allow poor
countries to buy cheap drugs. This means millions of poor people will
still not have access to medicines for diseases such as HIV/Aids,
malaria and tuberculosis.
The
World Trade Organization (WTO) suffered a setback when the United
States failed to rally around a deal aimed at providing poor countries
with better access to life-saving medicines, reported Agence
France-Presse (AFP).
Negotiators
for the 144 member countries of the WTO admitted after a meeting
of the ruling General Council in Geneva that they were bitterly
disappointed at failing to meet a self-imposed deadline for an agreement
before winter holidays.
However,
they vowed to press on with talks in the New Year, and set a new
deadline for a meeting scheduled on February 10 to 11, 2003.
U.S.
negotiators said the deal would allow too many drugs patents to be
ignored, according to the BBC news online.
Talks
have been rescheduled, but the international medical organisation,
Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF), told the BBC that there was little
chance of them succeeding.
The
talks, held at the WTO headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, broke up
early Saturday.
"I
have to say, there is no way to sugar-coat this bitter pill. We are
disappointed," the Canadian representative, Sergio Marchi said.
"One-hundred
and forty-three countries stood on the same ground, we were hoping to
make that unanimous." He was apparently referring to the United
States as the only country rejecting the deal.
"While
we're disappointed, we're not disheartened, the cause is just and we
need to redouble efforts next year," he added.
The
principle of allowing developing countries access to cheap versions of
drugs still protected by copyright had been agreed at WTO talks a year
ago.
However,
it is not clear if that principle can be turned into a detailed
agreement that all sides are happy with. Under current rules, countries
are required to respect drugs patents for 20 years.
Critics
say this delays the production of much cheaper generic medicines, which
are needed in developing countries because patients and health services
can not afford the more expensive versions.
The
WTO talks are aimed at relaxing the rules on intellectual property
rights to enable countries in need to import cheaper versions of
essential drugs.
While
the talks have dragged on through the year, the problem of HIV/Aids has
grown worse. Figures released by the United Nations last month showed
that more than 40 million people are now living with the disease.
The
United States said the proposed deal would mean that illnesses that are
not infectious, such as diabetes and asthma, could also be treated with
cheap, generic drugs.
The
U.S. negotiator, Linnet Deily, said her country "could not meet the
consensus on the issue".
U.S.
Fears "Unfounded"
In
sub-Saharan Africa, nearly 30 million people are estimated to be
infected with the HIV/Aids virus.
African
negotiators say the fears expressed by the United States are unfounded.
"Any
attempt to redefine this declaration will unravel the careful balance
achieved on many issues," Kenyan negotiator Amina Chawahir Mohamed
told the Geneva meeting, AFP reported.
MSF
told the BBC that it was now "time to find solutions outside the
WTO".
"If
there had been any flexibility to reach an agreement, the United States
would have shown that flexibility.
"This
is not just a failure of the Geneva talks, but of two years of
negotiations," Ellen 'pHoen said.
She
said individual countries should now go ahead and allow their own
pharmaceutical industries to export to other countries that need cheaper
drugs.
MSF
argues that such measure is already allowed for under the 1994 agreement
brokered by the WTO.
Such
moves would almost certainly trigger disputes with the U.S. and major
western drugs companies which the WTO would have to settle.
Ministers
meeting in the Qatari capital Doha in November last year gave the
Geneva-based WTO until the end of 2002 to devise a solution to
the high-profile problem.