NEW
DELHI, November 30 (IslamOnline) - In one of its strongest show of
solidarity with Iraq so far, the Indian government has come out in its
firm support, and said that it won't allow Iraq feel let down under
any circumstances. The Indian government spelt out its stand in
categorical terms on the floor of the Indian Parliament here Thursday,
November 28.
Yashwant
Sinha, federal external affairs minister, told a session of the Rajya
Sabha (Upper House or House of Elders in the Parliament) that Iraq
under President Saddam Hussein has been a friend of India. He should
not feel let down. India's support for Iraq is principled and
constant.
Replying
to a short-duration discussion on the situation in West Asia, Sinha
said he had apprehensions that if any unilateral U.S.-sponsored
military action against Iraq takes place it could spell disaster
extending beyond the Gulf region. India is keeping close watch on the
developments that threaten to disturb world peace and security, Sinha
said.
Let's
not allow emotions to overtake our stand and responsibility and let
national interest and idealism, which have been the two pillars of our
foreign policy, give expression to our position, Sinha stressed and
added. The world peace should not be affected because of the adventure
of one country.
Any
action against Iraq should be under the auspices of the United Nations
and the issue should be resolved through peaceful means without
resorting to use of military force. And, if the UN weapons inspectors
don't find any weapons of mass destruction and Baghdad satisfactorily
complied with the arms inspectors, then the sanctions imposed against
Iraq since 1990 should be lifted, the external affairs minister said.
Referring
to the visit of Saddam Hussein's special envoy Al-Sahhaf to the Indian
capital last week, Sinha said that Al-Sahhaf had assured and
demonstrated complete agreement regarding Baghdad's acceptance and
compliance of the UN resolution. Iraq had told us that it does not
have weapons of mass destruction and hence it would allow UN
inspectors in and also abide by the UN resolutions, Sinha said.
Sinha
met with Arab ambassadors in New Delhi last August. At that time too,
he had stated the government's stand that the use of force against any
nation was completely unacceptable. We are very clear that there
should be no armed action against any country, more particularly with
the avowed purpose of changing a regime, Sinha said. Iraq had every
right to deter any U.S. possible attack, he added.
Iraqi
Ambassador to India, Salah Al-Mukhtar hoped that Indian policy would
be much clearer. Now, India has fully understood that any war against
Iraq besides the absence of legal coverage will affect directly its
major interests.
India's
sound backing of Iraq this time round is not without any reason. New
Delhi has high stakes particularly in the Gulf region because it
imports most of its crude oil from here. Besides, 3.5 million Indian
expatriates are presently working in Iraq.
Also,
historically and traditionally, India has strong political and
economic relations with that country. Among few Arab states, Iraq is
one of them to have supported India on Kashmir issue. Besides, the
infrastructure in Iraq has been largely built by Indian firms.
However,
during the 1991 Gulf War, India, for reasons best known to its
leaders, demonstrated a flip-flop attitude regarding its stand on
Iraq. On one hand, the then external affairs minister Inder Kumar
Gujral flew to Baghdad to commiserate with Saddam Hussein, while on
the other Chandrashekhar government surreptitiously allowed refueling
facilities to U.S. military planes in India.
Now
that the Gujarat elections are about to take place, Indian Muslims,
the second-largest Muslim community in terms of population in the
world after Indonesia, would feel further alienated if India tries to
deviate from its self-professed stand and rashly supports a war,
overtly or covertly, against Iraq without UN sanction