PARIS,
October 16 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) - French President Jacques
Chirac reiterated on Wednesday, October 16, his country’s firm
opposition to U.S. attempts to win U.N. backing for the use of military
force against Iraq and denied any link between Baghdad and Al-Qaeda.
France
is determined to see the council adopt a two-step approach to the Iraqi
crisis as opposed to Washington's pursuit of a single resolution
threatening automatic use of military force if arms inspections are
blocked, said Agence-France-Presses (AFP).
In
an interview with the Future satellite channel and Radio Orient before
leaving for a Mideast tour, Chirac stressed that "France is
completely hostile" to giving the United States automatic
authorization to use force if Washington deemed that Iraq was not fully
permitting the inspections.
Hours
ahead of a crucial meeting of the deeply divided U.N. Security Council
on Iraq, Chirac underlined that, while there was "a potential
danger in the probable or possible possession of weapons of mass
destruction by the Iraqi regime... the aim is to disarm Iraq, not change
its regime."
War
may be needed to achieve that goal, "but it's always the last
resort," Chirac said.
Meanwhile,
Iraqi Vice President Ezzat Ibrahim said Wednesday, that "we are
proud of France's friendship for the Arabs" and added that he hoped
Paris would strengthen its position "in the event of (U.S.)
aggression against Iraq (or) in order to prevent this aggression ... or
to back us if need be."
"The
French people's stand is sympathetic to Iraq," he said, urging the
French government to translate this into policy and back Iraq.
In
an interview with Lebanon's L'Orient Le Jour newspaper on Wednesday,
Chirac also added that France had no proof substantiating U.S. President
George W. Bush's claims of a link between Iraq and al-Qaeda.
Other
French officials have also indicated that efforts by the United States
and its staunch ally Britain to push through a U.S.-drafted resolution
have made no headway.
Russia
has sided with France, calling the U.S. draft "unacceptable",
setting the scene for a acrimonious session of the U.N. Security Council
when it meets later Wednesday in New York.
The
four countries all have veto power over council decisions.
The
fifth veto-wielding state, China, has given a cool reception to the U.S.
draft but offered no firm position.
Although
a source of frustration, both Washington and Paris had up to now made
big efforts to keep the disaccord as behind-the-scenes as possible,
avoiding public statements that might antagonize the other and keeping
the lines of communication open.
Chirac
and Bush spoke by telephone last week and Paris on Wednesday dispatched
French Defense Minister Michele Alliot-Marie on a two-day visit to
Washington for talks with her U.S. counterpart, Donald Rumsfeld, Vice
President Dick Cheney, Secretary of State Colin Powell and National
Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice.
But,
in comments made before her U.S. trip, and before last weekend's
unclaimed blast in Bali that killed more than 180 people, Alliot-Marie
said that the world should not confuse the two dangers: terrorism and
Iraq.
"We
mustn't mix everything up. Iraq is a separate issue. Iraq worries us
because of its weapons of mass destruction, but the weapons of mass
destruction are not necessarily going to be used by terrorists,"
the minister said.
A
demonstration by at least 6,000 people also took place in Paris last
Saturday October 12, to protest against the U.S. war plans and to urge
France to use its veto against the U.S. draft in the Security Council.
Demonstrators
marched through the capital chanting "No to war against Iraq, no
blood for oil" and brandishing slogans reading "Hands off Iraq
- stop Bush" while smaller similar rallies took place in other
French cities.
But
France, sensitive to accusations that it is trying to protect commercial
relations with oil-rich Iraq, has stressed that it wants Baghdad to
agree to beefed-up inspections aimed at identifying and destroying
nuclear, chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction.
France's
first resolution would set a strict deadline for the inspections.
If
that was ignored or not fully complied with, in view of all the Security
Council members, not just the United States, then a second resolution
would be passed spelling out the consequences for Iraq, which would
likely include military action.