 |
|
Sheikh
Youssef Al-Qaradawi
|
By
Ayman Qenawi & Angy Ghannam, IOL Cairo Staff
CAIRO,
October 7 (IslamOnline) - As the U.S. sets the scene for an
“unavoidable” war on Iraq which has accepted the unconditional
return of U.N. arms inspectors and agreed to give them access to
“all” sites, an organized anti-Islam campaign in the western media
continues to defame Muslim scholars and deliberately misinterpret
Islamic regulations.
The
latest episode of the anti-Muslim campaign was an article published
October 2 in U.S. newspaper, the Washington Times, by
two members of a Jewish organization who used the events of 9/11 as a
tool to attack Muslim scholars accusing them of preaching hate and of
terrorizing Arab and Muslim moderates into staying silent.
The
two writers are connected to the Simon Wiesenthal Center, a leading
Jewish organization. Abraham Cooper is the associate dean of the
organization, and Harold Brackman is a historical consultant to the
center.
Although
the two authors of the article admitted that the Central Committee of
the World Council of Churches, the National Council of Churches and
dozens of Protestant and Orthodox religious leaders stand firmly
against U.S. President George Bush’s war threats to Iraq and that
they exhorted world countries not to bow to American pressures to join
hands in the campaign against Iraq “under the pretext of the war on
terrorism,” they branded Muslim religious scholars who oppose the
war on Iraq as “preachers of hate.”
The
two writers also accused moderate Muslim scholars as being silent
because of fear. “A year after September 11 and on the eve of
probable war with Iraq, the silence among moderate Muslims is ominous.
The bottom line is that ordinary Arabs and Muslims have no voice.
Millions of them oppose violence and abhor terrorism, but remain
silent in the face of intimidation and death.”
“The
silence of the moderates is as striking in supposedly friendly Egypt
and Saudi Arabia as it is in Syria and Iran. Indeed, in these nations,
respected Muslim religious leaders routinely fan the flames of
hatred,” they charged.
Ignoring
Islamic rulings that respect the freedom of belief expression, they
claimed that the reason for this silence is that “dissent in the
Muslim world is dangerous. Most moderates have long since been cowed
into silence by their radical brethren. They hide their opinions for
their own good, while radical religious leaders preach hate and stifle
dissent.”
“From
Baghdad to Khartoum and Karachi and from Algeria to Afghanistan, the
extremists who hold sway brook little dissent,” they charged.
However,
in reality, Islam advocates the principles of freedom, including
freedom of religion, thought, and expression. Islam rejected forcing
people to believe even in its message.
Trying
to cast doubts on the clear-cut positions of major moderate Islamic
scholars, Brackman and Cooper tried to water down condemnations of the
9/11 attacks on the United States.
Ignoring
the fact that prominent Muslim scholar Sheikh Youssef Al-Qaradawi was
among the first religious leaders to deplore the attacks, the two
writers claimed that he only condemned the attacks because the
hijacked planes were carrying civilians.
“Take
Sheik You Al Qaradawi, who reaches millions each week through his own
show on Qatar-based Al Jazeera television. He was praised by the New
York Times for condemning the September 11 attacks, but he only
opposed them because the planes that hit the World Trade Center and
the Pentagon carried civilian passengers.”
In
a statement issued in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, Al-Qaradawi had
said: “Our hearts bleed for the attacks that has targeted the World
Trade Center [WTC], as well as other institutions in the United States
despite our strong oppositions to the American biased policy towards
Israel on the military, political and economic fronts.
“Islam,
the religion of tolerance, holds the human soul in high esteem, and
considers the attack against innocent human beings as a grave sin,”
he maintained.
Al-Qaradawi
also asserted that killing hundreds of helpless civilians who have
nothing to do with the decision-making process and are striving hard
to earn their daily bread, such as the victims of the attacks, is
considered a heinous crime in Islam.
He
slammed Al-Qaeda over claiming responsibility of the synagogue
explosion on the Tunisian island of Djerba in April 2002 that killed
19 people, including 14 German tourists and said that it is not
permissible in Islam to do so.
Interviewed
by IslamOnline, Al-Qaradawi said Islam prohibits attacks on places of
worship such as churches and synagogues or attacks on men of religion,
even in the state of war.
“Civilians,
such as the German tourists, should not be killed, or kept as
hostages. Jews, not in conflict with Muslims, must not be killed as
well. Anyone who commits these crimes is punishable by Islamic Sharia
and have committed the sin of killing a soul that Allah has prohibited
to kill and of spreading corruption on earth,” said Al-Qaradawi.
Al-Qaradawi
also denounced the kidnapping and killings of civilians and foreigners
by the Abu Sayyaf militia in the Philippines.
Commenting
on such crimes, Al-Qaradawi said it is shameful to commit such acts in
the name of the Islamic faith, saying that such acts produce
backlashes against Islam and Muslims worldwide.
The
veteran Muslim scholar also led a delegation of top Islamic scholars
to Afghanistan in a bid to broker a solution for the standoff between
Taliban leader Mullah Mohamed Omar and the world community over the
demolition of Afghanistan’s cultural heritage, including two massive
Buddha statues.
Al-Qaradawi
even issued a fatwa (religious ruling) that Afghanistan’s statues
are not idols, and thus would not threaten Muslim beliefs or
contradict Islamic doctrine.
“The
demolition of these statues will harm the image of Islam and will
provoke the anger of the international community, especially Buddhists
who number 300 million,” Al-Qaradawi said.
Brackman
and Cooper continued to list propagated allegations of Christians
being forced to convert to Islam in Indonesia, non-Muslims being
killed and enslaved in Sudan and churches being put afire in Pakistan,
ignoring all political intricacies and tribal politics present in
these countries.
They
failed to mention, however, anti-Muslim campaigns on the rampage in
the United States. They did not mention unwarranted arrest campaigns
targeting American Muslims just for being Arabs or Muslims.
They
also failed to mention the anti-Muslim pogroms that racked the Indian
state of Gujarat earlier this year - a pogrom in which 2,000 Muslims
were killed by Hindu fanatics, and up to 100,000 forced out of their
homes and into refugee camps.
Egypt’s
grand mufti, Sheikh Mohammed Ahmed al-Tayeb, was also slammed by
Brackman and Cooper, as they claimed he “seems cut from the same
cloth. He has declared that suicide attacks are “the sole means of
struggle which the Palestinians have in current circumstances” and
should not be condemned.”
However,
al-Tayeb has declared resistance fighters should not target civilians
or children in their resistance to the Israeli occupation.
On
October 4, the Defense for Children International and the Early
Childhood Resource Center said that the vast majority of Palestinian
children killed during the uprising against Israeli occupation that
broke out two years ago died in places where they should have been
safe.
The
two human rights groups gave a figure of 350 children killed and
another 7,000 wounded.
On
the decades-long Arab-Israeli conflict, Al-Qaradawi told Al-Jazeera
satellite TV channel on May 2, 2002, that he was against Israeli
occupation of Palestinian lands and holy shrines. “We do not fight
Israelis because they are Jews, but because they took our land, killed
our children and profaned our holy places,” he said.
“The
battle is a battle of land, rather than one of belief,” Al-Qaradawi
said.
Brackman
and Cooper also attacked Sheikh Aaed ben Maqbul al-Qurni, saying that
he endorses “the use of nuclear weapons against the enemies of
Islam.”
They
said that he “recently argued, for example, that Arabs must reject
the obligations of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty because there
can be “no agreement with (heretics) concerning the prohibition of
such weapons, [unless] either they become Muslims . . . or accept the
reign of Islam . . . or a battle with whatever weapons are allowed by
Islamic law.” In other words, he invokes Islamic tradition to urge
Muslim governments to acquire and deploy weapons of mass destruction
against Israel and other “enemies of Islam.””
However,
they fail to mention the nuclear capabilities of India, the United
States, or even Israel, which has an estimated 200-400
nuclear-equipped missiles with a sophisticated delivery system.