WASHINGTON,
October 1 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) - U.S. President George W.
Bush, at the risk of angering the Arab and Muslim worlds, signed
legislation Monday, October 1, that requires his administration to
identify occupied Jerusalem as Israel's capital.
Faced
with a choice between endorsing the controversial bill passed by
Congress and shutting down U.S. diplomatic activity, Bush put his
signature on the Foreign Relations Authorization Act for 2003, which
gives the administration more than $4 billion for running the State
Department, said the Israeli daily newspaper, Ha’aretz.
Bush
had the power to veto the bill, but the provisions on occupied Jerusalem
were only a small part of a piece of legislation that covers the whole
world and gives his administration the money needed to run diplomacy.
In
a written statement, Bush said U.S. policy regarding Jerusalem "has
not changed."
If
Congress meant the language on Jerusalem to be mandatory, then lawmakers
were encroaching on the president's right to conduct foreign policy, he
said.
"The
purported direction... would, if construed as mandatory rather than
advisory, impermissibly interfere with the president's constitutional
authority to formulate the position of the United States, speak for the
nation in international affairs and determine the terms on which
recognition is given to foreign states," Bush said.
State
Department spokesman Richard Boucher said Monday that the United States
continues to believe that the status of Jerusalem should be decided in
"permanent status" talks between Israelis and Palestinians.
"We
have always opposed legislative action that hinders the president's
prerogatives in advancing our interests in the region and promoting a
just and lasting peace," he added.
Boucher
said the Bush administration also had opposed this part of the
legislation. "Those kinds of provisions are not helpful," he
told a news briefing.
The
bill goes further on occupied Jerusalem than previously demanded by
Congress, which for years has pressed successive presidents on the
related question of moving the U.S. Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to
occupied Jerusalem.
The
new legislation, passed by Congress last week, adds three mandatory
provisions that change the way the United States treats occupied
Jerusalem.
It
says that none of the funds appropriated can be used for a diplomatic
facility in Jerusalem unless it falls under the supervision of the U.S.
ambassador to Israel. Presently, the U.S. consul general in Jerusalem,
who deals mainly with Palestinians, now reports directly to the State
Department.
It
also denies the use of funds for any official U.S. government document,
which lists countries and their capitals, unless the publication
identifies Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
Third,
in official U.S. documents such as passports, birth certificates and
nationality certifications, U.S. citizens born in Jerusalem may insist
that the documents record their place of birth as Israel.
Lastly,
the legislation also withholds $10 million of $35 million in economic
aid allocated to Lebanon in 2003 until the Lebanese army deploys to the
Israeli-Lebanese border and the Lebanese government asserts its
authority in the area where the army deploys - a direct reference to the
Lebanese government’s allowing the resistance group Hezbollah to
maintain order in the disputed Shebaa Farms area.
The
bill also urges the president to impose sanctions against the
Palestinians if they do not comply with signed agreements, providing for
an additional $300 million in aid to Israel, including $100 million in
munitions as it prosecutes its campaign in the West Bank and Gaza, while
rejecting additional equivalent aid for Egypt, the U.S. daily newspaper,
the Washington Post, reported.
The
language of the bill reflects the pro-Israel stance of Congress;
language regarding the move was contained in both the House and Senate
versions of the bill, which Congress passed September 26.
Previous
U.S. administrations have promised to make the move but have repeatedly
put it off because of the ill feeling it would create in the Arab world,
which considers Arab East Jerusalem to be occupied territory and the
capital of a future Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza.
The
U.S. official position has been that the future of the city should be
decided through Israeli-Palestinian negotiations.
The
Arab American Institute wrote to Bush Friday, September 27, urging him
to veto the bill, on the grounds that it overturns existing U.S. policy
and presidential authority.
“At
a time when you are building a coalition to support our goals in the
Middle East, Congress should not be undermining your efforts,” said
George Salem, chairman of the institute.
“If
made into law, [it] will further inflame and deepen resentment among
Arabs and Arab countries toward the United States,” added the
institute’s president, James Zogby.
“While
the administration works to strengthen our relations throughout the
region, a few members in Congress use stealth tactics to pass
legislation that was not considered fully by either house. This is not
the way to make policy where so many vital U.S. interests are at stake.
“We
are trying to build a coalition in the Arab world,” said Zogby. But
with passage of the bill, “we will be inflaming people and making it
difficult for people to work with us.”
One
administration official agreed, saying, “There are many in the region
who would view this with grave concern, because it suggests we have
abandoned our traditional impartial role,” the Post
reported.
And
Salem noted, “These provisions represent a serious shift in policy and
are potentially disruptive to emerging efforts to reform Palestinian
institutions. Jerusalem is one of the most critical issues in this
conflict; and any attempt to create a de facto, Congressionally-mandated
recognition of Israel’s sole claim flies in the face of three
generations of U.S. foreign policy.”
Israel
captured the eastern part of the city in the 1967 Six-Day War and later
annexed it. Israeli governments have said the whole city is Israel's
eternal capital.
The
annexation has never been recognized by the international community and
the United States has consistently held that a resolution to the
city’s status must be negotiated by the Israelis and Palestinians in
the context of a final peace deal