ROME,
September 16 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) - The head of Italy's
Catholic bishops said a U.S.-led war against Iraq would have
"unacceptable" human consequences and would destabilize the
Middle East, while Jordan's opposition Islamic Action Front (IAF)
charged Monday, September 16, that U.S. pledges to work with the U.N.
Security Council on a new resolution on Iraq were nothing more than
"deceit".
Opening
a three-day meeting of the ruling council of the Italian Catholic
Bishops Conference, Cardinal Camillo Ruini, called for greater vigilance
by the international community to prevent the conflict from breaking
out, reported Agence France-Presse (AFP).
"Without
doubt, more rigorous vigilance is necessary to prevent the risk of a new
and greater tragedy," he said.
Ruini
said a new war "would have unacceptable human costs and very
serious destabilizing effects on the entire Middle Eastern region, and
probably around the world."
The
cardinal said the dissuasive power of the United Nations, "with the
strongest determination and the sincere and solid commitment of all
countries capable of exercising real influence, even in this difficult
situation," could guarantee peace and security.
At
the same time, he said the Baghdad government "must obviously show
its willingness to respect accords."
In
Amman, meanwhile, Jordan's IAF slammed U.S. President George W. Bush's
pledges to work with the U.N. to justify invading Iraq were nothing more
than a "deceit".
"We
warn against the dangers of the deceit" contained in Bush's speech
to the U.N. General Assembly on Thursday, September 12, the party said
in a statement, AFP reported.
Bush
said he would work with the U.N. on a new resolution to force Iraq to
comply with past Security Council resolutions, stressing that Iraq must
be disarmed or face an "unavoidable" war.
"By
turning to the United Nations, the U.S. president is deceiving the
American people ... and world public opinion," the IAF said, adding
that Bush was preparing for unilateral military action against Iraq.
It
also criticized Arab countries, which welcomed Bush's speech, saying
this was a "let-down for Iraq and the Arab people" and
recalling that an Arab summit last March in Beirut rejected any attack
on Iraqi sovereignty.
The
IAF echoed Jordan's official position that Baghdad should engage in a
dialogue with the United Nations for an end to the U.N. sanctions in
force against Iraq since 1990.
However,
it did not uphold Amman's stand that Iraq should allow the return of
weapons inspectors in line with U.N. and U.S. demands.
Following
Bush's speech before the United Nations, opposition to military strikes
against Iraq retreated significantly, while pressure grew on Baghdad to
let the inspectors back in without conditions.
Iraq,
for its part, repeatedly declared it was not against the return of
inspections, as long as this was in line with respecting its territorial
integrity, and if that meant avoiding an eventual U.S. 'aggression'..