NEW
DELHI, September 8 (IslamOnline) - India and Pakistan have finally been
moving towards a breakthrough on Kashmir, reported the influential Times
of India on Sunday, September 8.
In
a nutshell, the settlement is based on the conversion of the Line of
Control (LoC) in Kashmir to an international border. This was first
leaked by The News, an important Pakistani daily newspaper, which
said on September 1st that President Musharraf during his forthcoming
meeting with President Bush will discuss "a strategic headway for
Kashmir solution" based on acceptance of LoC as border, barring
Pakistan-based Kashmiri groups from interferring in India's internal
affairs, withdrawal of Indian claim on the Pakistan-administered Kashmir
and Northern Areas.
India,
too, is willing to accept the package and forgo its claims on the
Pakistan-administered Azad Kashmir and Northern Areas which are part of
the erstwhile princely state of Jammu & Kashmir whose Maharaja
acceded to India in 1948.
The
New had said, quoting sources believed
to be disgruntled military officers who are not pleased by the new
scheme, that "a formula for crucial shift from the present stance
on Kashmir and related issues enjoying support of a strong lobby of
generals, politicians, cabinet members, strategists and experts in
Pakistan had been formed into a package" for Pak-U.S. talks during
the forthcoming visit.
This
package, the Pakistani newspaper said, was expected to invite a tirade
from influential circles that want continuation of the traditional
stance on Kashmir, notwithstanding the perils of such a policy, some of
which were of immediate nature given the Indian impatience with what
they call "continuing intrusion". The News disclosed
that top level consideration was being given in Washington to this
package.
America's
own strategic interests that are believed to be behind this package come
in the backdrop of certain developments which include the U.S.
Marines-led chase of Al-Qaeda and Taliban remnants in the tribal areas
of Pakistan along the Durand Line.
The
News added that recent statements issued
by U.S. policy-makers on the issue have revealed their intentions that
they are going to make their stay in the region longer than initially
perceived and, for this purpose, they need some mini garrisons in close
but safer areas for logistics and operational purposes.
The
Pakistani newspaper went on to say that the U.S. would be seeking
Pakistani cooperation that included provision of a base in the Northern
Areas [which is part of the Pakistan-administered Kashmir but not part
of Azad Kashmir], most probably in Skardu.
The
"bargain," according to The News, provides for
recognition by both countries of the LoC as a permanent border;
withdrawal of India's widely asserted claim on the Pakistan-administered
Azad Kashmir and the Northern Areas, and, as a consequence, Islamabad's
agreement to make it clear to the Kashmiri groups that holding elections
in Kashmir was an internal issue of that country.
Such
a sequel of agreements conceived by the three sides also involved a
request from the U.S. for a base in Skardu for U.S. forces to conduct
operations against terrorist outfits, and for the long-term safeguarding
of U.S. interests in the region, The News said.
Both
Indian and Pakistan spokesmen were quick to deny this report although it
was observed that Pakistani government took no action against the
newspaper which was most likely if the report was false in view of the
limited press freedom available there.
The
Times of India today, September 8,
quoted "official sources" here as saying that the Vajpayee
government has agreed to accept the LoC as the international border
provided certain conditions are met with by Pakistan. These conditions
are: Pakistan will not claim or demand any more land in Kashmir after
the agreement and it will stop proxy-war and terrorism in India.
The
Times of India added that the U.S. is
putting pressure on Musharraf to mention this proposal in his
forthcoming UN speech next week. It is also believed that Pakistan is
unlikely to accept the proposal without demanding its "pound of
flesh" from the deal, which could come in the form of sops for
Kashmir.
Both
U.S. and UK are keen that bilateral talks between PM Vajpayee and
President Musharraf begin on the issue during the visit of the two heads
of State to the U.S. next week. But India would like to hold talks with
Pakistan only after the J&K polls are over peacefully.
India
wants to make haste slowly. It will start shortly, perhaps within this
month, with sending back the Indian ambassador to Pakistan. If the
J&K polls pass off peacefully, a non-official bilateral talks will
begin next month. This will lead to the simultaneous withdrawal of the
armies of both the countries from the borders. Thereafter, during the
bilateral talks it will be agreed to turn the LoC into the international
border.
The
Times of India disclosed that the
powerful cabinet committee on security has discussed the proposal at
length and most of the CCS members have endorsed it as realistic.
J&K chief minister Farooq Abdullah, a long-time advocate of this,
has expressed his support to the PM.
The
Vajpayee government has told Powell and Straw that India can accept this
proposal provided Pakistan accepts it and is willing to fulfil India’s
demands of giving up any further claims to Kashmir and putting an end to
the proxy war against India. Once the agreement is signed, the border
will be properly demarcated and delineated.
After
these disclosures, it is not surprising that as part of Track-II
diplomacy a pro-India Pakistani elder statesman, Aslam Khattak, will be
visiting India shortly to hold talks with the Hurriyat Conference in
Delhi and most probably will also visit the Valley of Kahsmir. Khattak
is member of the Pakistani senate and president of the National Awami
Party.
Nasim
Zehra, an influential member of President Pervez Musharraf-nominated
Pakistan National Kashmir Committee (NKC) has already held talks with
Kashmir Committee chairman Ram Jethmalani and senior separatist leader
Shabir Shah in Delhi early this month on the Kashmir issue.
President
Musharraf had given a hint to the forthcoming change in his policy
towards Kashmir when he said on the BBC on September 6 that he is ready
to be "flexible" to resolve the Kashmir issue with India but
maintained that the vexed problem could be solved only if the two
countries displayed "pragmatism" and "flexibility."
General Musharraf had justified his coup against Nawaz Sharif precisely
on these grounds - showing flexibility on Kashmir.
"I
think if there is pragmatism and flexibility on both sides, certainly
there are solutions which can be acceptable to both," Musharraf
said in reply to a question in BBC's 'Question Time Pakistan' program.
It
is expected that President Musharraf will unveil his new plans in his
speech before the UN General Assembly on September 12. "The
President would be making a very important statement at the UN General
Assembly on Kashmir," foreign office spokesman Aziz Ahmed Khan told
a media briefing in Islambad on September 2.
Indian
analysts believe that conversion of the LoC into an international border
will be beneficial to India. Says K Subhramanyam, defence analyst,
"This is a concept that was emphasised during the Shimla conference
between Indira Gandhi and Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto.
It
was again brought into prominence during the Kargil conflict when
President Bill Clinton said that a solution to the border problem should
be found in the terms of the Shimla Pact. Clinton in a joint communiqué
with Nawaz Sharif further said, "You do not change boundaries with
blood."
IK
Gujral, former Prime Minister of India said "Both the countries
will have to be prepared to give up something in order to come to this
solution. India will have to cede claim to PoK and Pakistan will have to
do the same for J&K."
The
Kashmiris on this side of the border will not be happy. "What do
the Kashmiris stand to gain by accepting the status quo that was
agreed upon in the Shimla Pact?" Said Mirwaiz Maulvi Umar Farooq,
of the All Parties Hurriyat Conference.
"The
division of Kashmir into two halves will have tragic consequences for
the thirteen million Kashmiris living on both sides. When we talk about
accepting the LoC, we are talking only about a territorial solution.
What about the human dimension to this problem?"