With
additional reporting by Neveen A. Salem, IOL Washington D.C.
WASHINGTON
D.C., September 8 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) - Former United
Nations weapons inspector Scott Ritter on Sunday called for an
"honest broker mechanism" that would allow both an immediate
resumption of arms inspections and ensure no deviation from Security
Council resolutions.
The
mechanism foresees the inspectors' "unconditional return and yet
provides assurances to Iraq that unfettered access would only be applied
to disarmament issues and not be used to infringe upon Iraq's
sovereignty, dignity and national security," Ritter told Iraq's
parliament in an address.
"There
is a need for the confidence building mechanism for the monitoring of
the interaction between weapons inspectors and Iraq to ensure that there
are no deviations from the mandate of disarmament by the inspectors as
well as obstruction of the work of the inspectors by Iraq," Ritter
said, news agencies reported.
Ritter
said he had had talks with "representatives from several countries
about this concept and they have indicated their willingness to step
forth and work with Iraq and the UN secretary general to serve as such
an honest broker.
"To
have credibility in Iraq and to avoid perceptions of pressures from the
Security Council or its members, such an honest broker would have to
come from outside the UN framework."
The
mechanism would ensure that "for Iraq, the sins of the past would
not be repeated," Ritter said in reference to the cloud of spying
allegations that surrounded UNSCOM, the old verification group that was
withdrawn from Iraq in December 1998 on the eve of a U.S.-British
bombing campaign.
"In
short, the honest broker mechanism allows the peaceful non-violent
resolution for the current stand-off between the UN and Iraq in full
accordance with the letter of the international law."
But
Ritter added: "The only path towards peace Iraq should embrace is
the one that begins by Iraq agreeing to the immediate and unconditional
return of UN weapons inspections operating in full keeping with the
mandate as set forth by existing UN Security Council resolutions.
"Nothing
else will be acceptable. Iraq cannot attempt to link the return of the
weapons inspectors with any other issues regardless of justification.
Unconditional return, unfettered access, this is the only acceptable
action."
Ritter,
40, a former captain in the U.S. Marines who was once dubbed a
"cowboy" by UN staff and diplomats here for his intrusive
inspection procedures, resigned from the United Nations in August 1998,
citing a lack of UN and U.S. support for his tough disarmament methods.
However
in recent years Ritter has become increasingly critical of U.S. policies
towards Iraq. He has repeatedly stated that the sanctions have only
succeeded in targeting Iraqi civilians while leaving the government
virtually unharmed.
Over
1.5 million Iraqis, over half of whom are children have died as a direct
result of the 11-year-long U.S.-led UN sanctions.
IslamOnline
was told by UNICEF Baghdad that one of the organization’s main goals
is to make sure Iraqi children live through the first year of life.
One
of the main inspectors for the former UN disarmament commission, Ritter
has called for the UN sanctions slapped on Baghdad after its 1990
invasion of Kuwait to be lifted in return for a resumption of weapons
inspections.
In
telephone conversations with IslamOnline, Ritter has stated that he does
not believe Iraq currently has weapons of mass destruction and that he
believes there needs to be a “qualitative” as opposed to
“quantitative” assessment of Iraq’s weapons capabilities.
“[The]
disarmament [of Iraq] took many years and was never easy. But by 1995,
the weapons inspectors could account for over 90% of Iraq's weapons of
mass destruction infrastructure as being eliminated. Based upon this
success, I have stated clearly that Iraq no longer possesses a viable
weapons of mass destruction capability, that Iraq has fundamentally - or
qualitatively - disarmed,” Ritter told IslamOnline via telephone
earlier.
He
went on to state that it is difficult to determine what has transpired
in Iraq since 1998, when the weapons inspectors were last in the
country.
“…while
we cannot account for all of Iraq's prohibited capabilities, we do know
that what is unaccounted for does not constitute a meaningful weapons of
mass destruction capability and that based upon this, Iraq no longer
poses a threat - from the standpoint of weapons of mass destruction to
its neighbors, the world, the U.S. or its own people.”
Quantitatively”
accounting for Iraq’s weapons means that “every screw will be
accounted for,” while “qualitative” assessments would focus more
on actual weapons capabilities