 |
|
President Saddam Husain welcoming Ram Naik, Indian Oil Minister
|
By
IOL South Asia Correspondent
NEW
DELHI, Sept 6 (IslamOnline) - In the strongest ever bid to woo its “
traditional friends” in the Arab world, India has indicated
categorically and in no uncertain terms that it is greatly opposed to
the U.S. military action against Iraq.
In
a flurry of diplomatic initiative, Indian Foreign Secretary, Kanwal
Sibal, arrived in Russia Friday, September 6. He will be holding talks
with top Russian officials regarding U.S. military action against Iraq
to dethrone President Saddam Hussein. Russia holds views similar to
that of India.
Krishnan
Raghunath, India’ s Ambassador to Russia, while talking to media
persons in Moscow, said, “ India and Russia have a common stand on
Iraq and, like most of the members of the global community, speak for
the political solution of the crisis on the basis of UN
resolutions.”
Earlier,
India’ s Foreign Affairs Minister Yashwant Sinha, in a meeting with
Arab and African ambassadors had stated the government’ s stand that
the use of force against any nation is completely unacceptable. “ We
are very clear that there should be no armed action against any
country, more particularly with the avowed purpose of changing a
regime,” Sinha said.
It
may be noted that the United States is trying to drum up support from
various countries for a military action against Iraq. The United
States fears that "weapons of mass destruction" in Iraq’ s
hands are likely to fall into the hands of terrorists, and therefore
the military action is justified.
However,
much to the discomfiture of the U.S., military action against Iraq
especially with the expressed aim of toppling Saddam Hussein, has met
with stiff opposition from allies like Germany and France, besides
several other countries. Though, according to latest reports, Britain
is assisting the U.S. in pounding Iraq. 100 jet fighters belonging to
the U.S. and Britain took part in action against Iraq Friday,
September 6, reports said.
India,
however, has its own reasons for not supporting the United States this
time round although it has been consistently wooing Washington for
better ties. There is a growing realization among government circles
here that Washington cannot do “ much more” for India regarding
Kashmir problem and the issue of "cross-border terrorism"
which India claims is being supported by Pakistan.
The
government is also bitter about the U.S. approach in its fight against
terrorism. Government circles here are piqued over the U.S.
"duality". They complain that while on the one hand the U.S.
is trying its level best to topple the Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein,
on the other it is trying to keep the Pakistani dictator Gen. Pervez
Musharraf firmly in the saddle.
During
the 1991 Gulf War, India tried to run with the hare and hunt with the
hound in terms of its support to Iraq. While India opposed the U.S.
and allied attack on Iraq, at the same time it provided refueling
facilities to U.S. planes in Indian airports. Now, India has learnt a
few diplomatic lessons the hardest way, officials in the Foreign
Affairs ministry admit. The country cannot afford to lose its
traditional Arab friends come what may, they said.
Iraqi
Ambassador to India, Salah Al-Muqtar, said, “ Iraq hopes that this
time, Indian policy will be clearer. India has understood fully now
that any war with Iraq besides the absence of legal coverage will
affect directly its major interests. India has at least four million
Indians working in the Gulf region.”
India
fears that in the event of the U.S. military attack against Iraq oil
prices would skyrocket. Fuel supplies would be disrupted adversely
affecting economies worldwide, particularly Third World nations. The
U.S. strike would not only destabilize Iraq, but also the entire Gulf
region as well as Central Asia, officials said. India largely depends
on the oil supplies from the Gulf region.
In
1999 Indian annual trade with Iraq was $300 million. At present it has
touched $1 billion, sources said, adding that next year this would be
doubled.
India
has another reason to feel indebted to Iraq. The Organization of
Islamic Countries (OIC), which was once a bitter critic of India, is
now ready to consider its membership. Iraq played a major role in
pleading India’ s case, officials said.
Another
major irritant with India is that its immediate rival Pakistan would
shortly become a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council for
the 2003-2004 term during the 57th UN General Assembly to be held in
New York in September-December. India would therefore like to keep the
Arab countries on its right side at least during this period.
|
|
-
Chirac, Putin Hold Firm on Rejecting Bush-Blair ‘Military Plans’ against Iraq
-
Sharon Says, For Israel, Oslo Accords No Longer Exist
-
Hezbollah Slams U.S. Threatened Action against It ‘In Good Time’
-
German Police Arrest Couple in Planned Attack on U.S. Base
-
India Strongly Disapproves U.S. Military Action against Iraq
-
U.S. Military Chemical Depot on Alert Following Intrusion
-
Kashmiri Leaders Arrested to Enhance Democracy
-
U.S. Congress Meets in New York Commemorating Attacks
-
Serb Soldier Tells Milosevic Trial He Had Orders To Massacre Kosovo Civilians
-
100 American, British Jets Attack Iraq: Telegraph
-
Israel Kills 2 Palestinians in Jenin, Fires 5 Missiles At Gaza
-
U.S. Senate Approves Arming Commercial Airline Pilots
A
Year after Sept 11
-
9/11
Brought Muslims, Non-Muslims Closer: Analysts
-
Bush
to Make National Address on Sept 11, Will Lay Wreath At “Ground Zero”
-
Anti-Terror
War Cover Rights Abuses in U.S. & Worldwide
-
Ridge:
No Credible Threats for 9/11, Confident of Homeland Approval
-
ISNA
Convention Calls for Self-Reflection, Activism Among Muslims
-
American
Teaching Unions Argue Over What Children Should Be Told About 9/11
-
Post
9-11 U.S. Foreign Policies Aggressive, Unilateral: U.S. Report
-
Palestine
… Three Massacres in 5 days
-
Homeless in Minutes
-
War on Iraq.. World Reaction
|
|
|
|
|
|