ÚÑÈí
 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 

Search »

Advanced Search »

 

Arab, International Consensus Against Invasion of Iraq

Iraqi President (R) speaks with Sheikh Hamed bin Jassem al-Thani, the Qatar foreign Minister

LOS ANGELES, August 28 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) - Qatar and Saudi Arabia didn’t express any support to the U.S. stirke agianst Iraq, complicating any Bush administration plan to launch an attack from militarybases in the region.

Qatar's foreign minister ended a two-day visit to Baghdad on Tuesday, August 27, during which he added his voice to a growing chorus of Arab opposition to a U.S. invasion of Iraq, complicating the Bush administration's ability to launch an attack from the region, Los Angeles Times reported.

The announcement coincided with a failed attempt by President Bush to win Saudi support for a military campaign and marked a victory for Iraqi President Saddam Hussein's diplomatic efforts to shield his regime from attack.

Saudi Arabia already had ruled out the use of its territory as a base for a U.S. war against Iraq, and the U.S. reportedly has been moving weapons and equipment to Qatar in recent months. But the Qatari foreign minister's statements suggested that the Persian Gulf state would not be happy to serve as a base for a military campaign against Iraq, the paper added.

“We are against any military action,” Foreign Minister Sheik Hamad Jassim ibn Jaber al Thani said Monday, August 26, on arrival in Baghdad, adding that the United States has not asked for permission to use bases in Qatar. “This issue should be resolved through the United Nations and diplomatic means.”

The Qataris also called on Hussein's regime to allow international weapons inspectors back in to confirm that Iraq is not developing weapons of mass destruction.

On Tuesday, Bush met with Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar bin Sultan at the president's ranch near Crawford, Texas. The Saudi side reiterated opposition to any military effort to overthrow Hussein, calling instead for a concerted diplomatic effort, Los Angeles Times added.

Meanwhile, Iraq continued in gathering support every front for the Iraqi people against the expected attack by the U.S. On Tuesday, the Iraqi foreign minister was in China and his vice president in Syria.

Iraq recently negotiated a $40-billion trade deal with Russia; has granted more than $1 billion in contracts to Turkey as part of the UN-approved “oil for food” program; returned looted archives to Kuwait; exchanged with Iran the remains of dead from their 1980-88 war and in March formally recognized Kuwait's territorial integrity.

In addition, Public support in the Arab world for Iraq is fueled by widespread anger over the U.S. relationship with Israel and the equally widespread conviction that Washington is using its declared war on terror as cover to advance its own interests. Public sentiment is so universal that even Kuwait, which a U.S.-led coalition liberated from Iraqi occupation in 1991, is officially opposed to an invasion.

“Kuwait won't help the U.S. just for the sake of helping,” said Abdullah Sahar, a professor of political science at Kuwait University. “It will help if there is a clear plan that complies with United Nations resolutions.”

“We don't want to see an all-out invasion of Iraq by the U.S.; this would mean all Arab countries are invaded,” he added.

Where Baghdad has refused to budge is on the issue of weapons inspectors, even while all of its Arab allies have called for Hussein to let them back in.

When a U.S.-led coalition forced Iraq out of Kuwait more than a decade ago, the UN Security Council imposed sanctions that will be lifted only when inspectors verify that Iraq's biological, chemical and nuclear weapons have been destroyed, along with long-range missiles. Inspectors have been barred since 1998.

In an interview with Al-Raifdain weekly Iraqi newspaper Tuesday, Vice President Taha Yassin Ramadan seemed to rule out Iraq's allowing inspectors back in, though the regime has played two ways on the issue, with some officials signaling that Baghdad is open to the idea and others ruling it out.

The UN inspectors “were the reason behind four U.S. aggressions on our country since 1991. So why should their presence in Iraq now prevent new U.S. attacks?” Ramadan was quoted as saying.

But Baghdad's reluctance to let inspectors back has not diminished pan-Arab support for Iraq, if not for Hussein personally. The main issue for the Arab community is the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. Washington has insisted it is not-or, at least, should not be-linked with regime change in Iraq, but in the Arab world, the two matters are inextricable.

“We are hurt by the policies adopted, implemented, followed, that have resulted in total bias toward Israel. We are hurt,” Arab League Secretary-General Amr Moussa said in an interview Tuesday.

“We are hurt. We are angry, and we cannot forget what is going on or what has happened to the Palestinians. We are in no mood to talk about any attack against any other Arab country.”

Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak delivered a similar message Tuesday to his nation in a televised address.

“I told the American government: If you strike at the Iraqi people because of one or two individuals and leave the Palestinian issue, not a single ruler will be able to curb the popular sentiments,” he said. “There might be repercussions, and we fear a state of disorder and chaos may prevail in the region.”

“Of course there is hatred among all people, because of the threat of the United States attacking Iraq while the Israelis are attacking the Palestinians,” said Mohammed Saleh Musfir, a political scientist at Qatar University. “Why should America interfere?”

When the U.S. built the international coalition that drove Iraq from Kuwait, times were very different. Iraq was clearly viewed as the aggressor. Saudi Arabia, which borders Iraq, was nervous that its oil fields might be the next target of Hussein's military. And the leadership in the region was generally terrified of an Iraq empowered by Kuwaiti oil.

These days, it is the United States that is widely viewed in the Middle East as the aggressor. U.S.-Arab ties are strained throughout the region-from Egypt, which is upset about a U.S. decision to link some financial aid to a human rights case, to Saudi Arabia, which feels it has been allegedly accused of interfering in September 11th attacks which had no proof yet.

“The situation is what we consider to be a clear aggression against a sovereign state,” said Georges Jabbour, a professor of political science at Aleppo University in Syria.

The fact remains that the U.S. will work hardly to carry out its plans in the Gulf as the American president George w. Bush put his point across to Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar bin Sultan during talks at the president's ranch in Crawford, Texas.


Yesterday's News

Search Articles 

 

 

News Archive :
Day:   Month: Year:   


Send Mail

Related Links


News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Politics in Depth | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims | IOL Radio

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map