Your Mail

ÚÑÈí

 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 

Search »

Advanced Search »

 

Don’t Succumb To U.S. Blackmail: HRW to Nations

HRW: U.S. administration’s warning to cut military aid “an empty threat”

UNITED NATIONS, August 14 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) - The New York-based group Human Rights Watch urged recipients of U.S. military aid on Tuesday to resist what it called U.S. “blackmail” over cooperating with the International Criminal Court (ICC).

“Governments should resist the Bush administration’s latest blackmail,” the group’s director Kenneth Roth said in a statement published on the organization’s website, reported Agence France-Presse (AFP).

He described as “an empty threat” the administration’s warning that it would cut off military aid to any country supporting the ICC unless it agreed never to surrender U.S. nationals to its jurisdiction.

“At a time when it is fighting a global war on terrorism, the administration is unlikely to jeopardize its military relationships around the world because of the remote possibility that a U.S. national will be unfairly prosecuted,” Roth said.

The United States has written to all governments that have ratified the ICC treaty asking them to sign bilateral agreements guaranteeing immunity for U.S. nationals, notably those involved in peacekeeping operations.

“To pressure them to agree, the administration is citing newly passed legislation, the American Service members’ Protection Act,” Roth said.

He noted that the law authorizes the use of military force to free U.S. and allied suspects from detention by the international court.

The law also bars various forms of U.S. military assistance to governments, other than NATO members and specified allies, that refuse to exempt U.S. nationals unless the U.S. president agrees that continued military aid is in the national interest, Roth said. “It’s an empty threat,” he went on.

“The law makes an exception for military aid that serves the U.S. national interest. The last time I checked, Washington doesn’t hand out military aid that it doesn’t believe is in the national interest.”

Roth accused the Bush administration of “stunning hypocrisy” in bringing pressure to bear on Yugoslavia, in particular.

It was rightly pressing Belgrade to turn over indicted war criminals to the U.N.’s special Yugoslav war crimes court in The Hague, he said. But on the other hand, it was trying to prevent Belgrade from surrendering any future U.S. suspect wanted by the Hague-based ICC.

“This stunning hypocrisy sends a signal that the rule of law is only for other people, not for U.S. nationals,” said Roth.

“It cannot be in America's long-term interest to undermine the rule of law in this way.”

Canada, Norway, Slovakia, Switzerland and Yugoslavia have already announced that they will not be rushed into immunizing U.S. nationals without first consulting other governments, said HRW on their website adding that the E.U. agreed that no member state should begin negotiating an exemption for U.S. nationals until a common European approach is discussed.

The European Commission criticized Romania, a candidate to join the E.U., for agreeing to such an exemption.

The ICC’s jurisdiction began on July 1, 2002. On September 3, the court’s historic first Assembly of States Parties will convene at United Nations Headquarters in New York. Made up of states that have ratified the ICC treaty, the assembly is the ICC’s governing body.

Seventy-seven states have ratified the treaty, including, most recently, Colombia - a country, along with the Democratic Republic of Congo, that is a likely candidate for the court’s first case.

More states are expected to ratify the treaty soon in order to participate in the election of judges and the prosecutor early next year. The court’s “Advance Team” is already at work in The Hague creating the technical and administrative infrastructure that the court will need to open in 2003.

Slovenia, asked by Washington to sign the pact, said it needed more time to decide on the matter, its foreign ministry said in a statement obtained by AFP Wednesday.

Slovenia, an E.U. candidate, has not been asked by the European Union not to sign the accord, but Ljubljana is “closely following consultations within the EU related to the U.S. initiative,” it added.

Slovenia is among the 10 most advanced E.U. candidate countries, expected to become a member in 2004. It is also expected to be invited to join NATO in November.

On Tuesday, the U.S. rebuked the European Commission for warning E.U. aspirant countries not to sign the deals, reported AFP.

The State Department said such a move was “inappropriate” and a violation of the sovereign right of independent nations to enter into treaties with other countries.

In addition, the department rejected the view of many E.U. nations that immunity deals should not be negotiated bilaterally between Washington and European capitals but rather as a bloc with the entire membership of the European Union.

The issue is threatening to sour trans-Atlantic relations and drive a new wedge between the United States, which is vehemently opposed to the court, and its European allies, who actively support it.

The United States has only managed to negotiate one Article 98 agreement with a European country - Romania, an EU hopeful. That deal was met by opposition from Brussels which said it regretted the move over the weekend.

On Monday, a spokesman for the European Commission - the E.U.’s executive body - called on other E.U. candidate countries not to sign such accords and asked that they wait until Brussels has completed an “analysis” of the consequences of doing so.

Deputy State Department spokesman Philip Reeker attacked those remarks.

“Any suggestion that E.U. candidate countries hold off their decisions until the European Union looks at this (is) in our view inappropriate in terms of seeking to direct sovereign candidate countries’ foreign policy choices in advance of E.U. accession,” he told reporters.

Several European Union members, including Germany, Denmark, the Netherlands and most recently Spain, maintain that a common policy must be adopted by the bloc.

Reeker hinted that the E.U. position was at odds with the encouragement that some E.U. members gave to the United States last month when they urged Washington to seek individual Article 98 agreements as a way of forging a compromise on the ICC at the U.N.

Secretary of State Colin Powell said earlier Tuesday that the United States was “not bludgeoning” foreign countries into signing such deals despite threats to withdraw military aid if they do not.

But he stressed that Washington took the matter extremely seriously and that the threat to withhold military assistance - contained in legislation signed last week by President George W. Bush - was a sign of how important it was.

“You’re well aware of what the Congress has said in the law with respect to the potential withholding of military aid,” Powell said after meeting with Spanish Foreign Minister Ana Palacio.

“But we’re not bludgeoning or threatening any of our friends,” he said, reiterating U.S. concerns over the possible politicization of the court that prompted Washington earlier this year to “unsign” the ICC treaty.

On Tuesday, Switzerland has refused to sign the immunity pact. According to Livio Zanolari, a spokesman for the foreign ministry, Switzerland does not host any U.S. soldiers, and “the Foreign Ministry does not see the necessity of concluding such an accord”.

On Sunday, August 4, Israel and the United on Sunday signed an accord not to extradite any of the other’s citizens to the ICC without mutual consent.

Under the pact, signed by visiting U.S. Undersecretary of State John Bolton and Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres, no extradition to the court in The Hague can go ahead without the agreement of the concerned individual's government, U.S. and Israeli officials said.

The agreement was made under section 98 of the ICC’s charter which restricts extradition of suspects when states have signed such agreements, Israeli officials said.

Both Israel and the United States signed the court’s original charter in 2000 but failed to ratify it this year, with Israel fearing it could be a used by hostile states against its occupation of the Palestinian territories.

 

Yesterday's News

Search Articles 

 

 

News Archive :
Day:   Month: Year:   


Send Mail

News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Muslim Affairs | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map