ÚÑÈí
 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 

Search »

Advanced Search »

 

India’s Rights Activists Worried over Visa Denial to Amnesty

Gujarat still simmers: Rapid Action Force in Delol

By IOL South Asia correspondent

NEW DELHI, July 23 (IslamOnline)- India’s human rights activists are worried over the government’s denial of visas to a team of Amnesty International, which wanted to visit the western state of Gujarat following a massive anti-Muslim pogrom in March-April.

Amnesty said in an official statement yesterday that “the team was planning to carry out investigations into recent massacres and human rights violations and monitor the progress made in bringing the perpetrators to justice”.

India’s leading human rights activist and editor of the prestigious Economic and Political Weekly, Gautam Navlakha, told IslamOnline that the denial of visas to the premier rights body team was “reprehensible”.

He termed the visa denial “strange” as the Union government had allowed a team of defense attaches of several countries to visit Kashmir.

“Whatever has happened in Gujarat is an open secret, evident before the entire world”, he said. The only motive behind the denial, he said, could be that “the government did not want the Amnesty team to meet people who could be critical of the happenings and the state government’s complicity in it”.

Prof. Iqbal Ansari, a veteran of many human rights battles over the decades, deplored the government’s decision to deny visa to Amnesty team.

Prof Ansari, who is a member of several international rights bodies, told IslamOnline that an earlier government had similarly denied visas to Amnesty, preventing it from visiting Kashmir from where human rights violations have been reported frequently. However, the Center had relented in the case of Mumbai riots and allowed Amnesty a visit.

The denial of visas shows that there is a lot to hide - killings, arson, denial of justice and government complicity”, Prof Ansari said.

Meanwhile, Amnesty said, “A government which fully accepts its responsibilities in protecting its citizens and upholds their constitutional rights does not shy away from international scrutiny”.

Chota Udaipur: police arrived after the damage was done

Criticizing the Indian action, the international human rights watchdog said the "refusal damages the image of both the Indian and Gujarat governments before their citizens and the international community."

The denial of visas has not deterred Amnesty, which declared it was “committed to exposing the truth on Gujarat massacres and campaigning for justice for the victims”.

Amnesty International added that "A government which fully accepts its responsibilities in protecting its citizens and upholds their constitutional rights to life and equality does not shy away from international scrutiny."

India today brushed aside Amnesty International's criticism for not allowing it to visit Gujarat, and said that "events in the state were already under independent scrutiny of its own organizations like the National Human Rights Commission and other national commissions and NGOs."

"We did not see what value a visit by a few London-based members of Amnesty International would add (to their findings)," Indian Deputy High Commissioner Satyabrata Pal said according to the official Indian news agency, PTI.

In a related development, rediff.com portal today quoted the Indian Ministry of External Affairs sources that India has made up its mind to deny visas to a team of Labor Party MPs from Britain if they intend to travel to Gujarat and Jammu and Kashmir as "observers." It was reported that such a team will travel shortly to India to study the situation from close quarters. The British MPs told the press in London that they intended to visit Gujarat and J&K "to get a clearer picture of the situation on the ground." A number of British nationals were killed and injured in the anti-Muslim pogroms in Gujarat last March.

"We have not been informed officially by the high commissioner about their impending visit. But if they apply for visas to observe the situation in the two states, we will say sorry. They are not welcome as observers," a source in the ministry told rediff.com

In March, India had made its displeasure known when a British Embassy report on Gujarat riots was "leaked" to the Indian press. The report claimed that over 2000 people were killed in the riots. Official figures have put the toll at around 900. The British report first published by Hindustan Times, later confirmed by the BBC, said that the violence in Gujarat 'aimed at removing Muslim influence from parts of the state.' The report adds that if the Sabarmati [train] tragedy hadn’t happened, another flashpoint would have been created to justify the pre-meditated violence as 'reaction.'

The British report added that “the violence had all the hallmarks of ethnic cleansing and that reconciliation between Hindus and Muslims is impossible while the Chief Minister [Modi] remains in power.”

The BBC quoted the document as saying that “the violence, far from being spontaneous, was planned, possibly months in advance, carried out by an extremist Hindu organization with the support of the state government.”

 

Yesterday's News

Search Articles 

 

 

News Archive :
Day:   Month: Year:   


Send Mail

News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Politics in Depth | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims | IOL Radio

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map