WASHINGTON,
July 11 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) – If U.S. President George
W. Bush fails to attack Iraq at the beginning of next year, he may
have missed his chance, Times Online reported Thursday, July
11.
The
paper said that the Pentagon is unlikely to consider sending thousands
of U.S. troops across the desert in the following summer months, when
temperatures rarely fall below 100F.
There
is an opportunity to strike in the autumn of next year, officials say,
but waiting until then risks the fighting spilling over into 2004,
leaving Iraqi President Saddam Hussein’s fate unresolved at the
start of a presidential election year, something that Republican
political strategists are loath to contemplate, Times Online
reported.
Despite
Bush’s early rhetoric against Saddam, his room for maneuver has
always been limited by the calendar. Reports of an invasion being
launched this autumn were always likely to be wide of the mark, it
said, adding that Americans go to the polls in early November for the
critical mid-term elections and Republican strategists do not want
their quest to regain control of the Senate wrecked by the
unpredictability of war.
Although
Bush enjoys the tacit support of many leading Democrats for taking on
Saddam, that could change in the ruthlessly partisan atmosphere likely
to prevail in 2004.
Times
Online also said that mistakes and reverses in a war that left
thousands of Americans dead could hurt Bush in a presidential
campaign, especially if exploited by a canny Democrat who presented
criticism as patriotism.
There
are early signs, however, that Bush will not enjoy a free political
ride.
Joe
Biden, the Democrat chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee, said Wednesday, July 10, that he wanted to question
administration officials in public this autumn about their proposals
for Iraq.
Bush
has public opinion with him in targeting Iraq, but there are signs
that it is weakening.
A
recent Gallup poll found that support for sending troops into Iraq has
fallen from 74% in November 2001 to 59%. White House officials want to
use support while it is there.
A
Fox News poll found that 75% of Americans would support Bush
authorizing the CIA to use deadly force to overthrow Saddam, a step
that he has not taken. Fifty-five per cent think that Washington
should try to assassinate Saddam.
According
to the article, Bush set a clock ticking in his State of the Union
address in January, when he labeled Iraq as part of an axis of evil,
along with Iran and North Korea.
Bush
said that the trio posed a “grave and growing danger”. He said
that time was not on America’s side and added: “I will not wait on
events while dangers gather. I will not stand by as peril draws closer
and closer.”
By
the time that Bush stands before Congress next January, he will need
to demonstrate that he is living up to his own rhetoric, and acting.
Yet the U.S. administration remains deeply divided about what
precisely the mission should be, let alone how to accomplish it.
Personality
clashes have also frustrated the war planning. While Defense Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld strongly believes that the mission should be focused
entirely on Saddam, Secretary of State Colin Powell wants a broader
brief, to include the transition to a democratic successor regime, the
kind of nation-building that Bush derided in his 2000 presidential
election campaign, it said.
“The
success in Afghanistan has emboldened some in the Administration, who
say that it shows that intervention will be welcomed if it is swift
and decisive. Officials talk increasingly about the search for an
“Iraqi Karzai”, referring to the new President of Afghanistan,”
the paper reported.
In
the past the U.S. President’s National Security Advisers have thrown
their weight around in debates between the Pentagon and State
Department. The role assumed by Condoleezza Rice is different. She
takes a back seat in debates, acting as a private summarizer for the
President.
The
arrangement pitches Rumsfeld against Powell, a fault line that is
likely to grow as planning intensifies.
Bush
confirmed this week that he was playing a central role. “I’m
involved in the military planning,” he told a press conference.
However,
some diplomats in Washington doubt whether an invasion will happen.
One said: “I know he wants to do it, but when you look at everything
involved, I still don’t see how he does it.”