ÚÑÈí
 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 

Search »

Advanced Search »

 


India Allows Foreign Investment in Print Media

India’s Information Minister Sushma Swaraj

By IOL South Asia correspondent

NEW DELHI, June 26 (Islam Online) - Amid fierce controversy, the Government of India allowed 26 percent foreign direct investment (FDI) in print media on Tuesday, June 25. This reverses the country’s long-held policy of disallowing any FDI in this crucial sector.

The debate over the desirability of allowing FDI in India’s print media had picked up momentum ahead of Tuesday’s central cabinet meeting scheduled to consider this issue.

There is a direct split in the civil society over this move, though what the major newspapers and political leaders have been saying is no sure indicator of the public mood.

There is an element of genuine concern among some people resisting FDI in print media as they fear a dilution of sovereignty and the hijacking of the national, political, economic and cultural discourse by mighty Western media empires.

This is the reason the First Press Commission, set up in 1954 (seven years after independence from British colonial domination), warned against foreign entry in print media. A year later, India moved ahead with a cabinet decision barring foreigners from owning or investing in newspapers as well as prohibiting foreign newspapers from publishing Indian editions.

Though most big newspapers and major political parties have been vociferously protesting the move, their intent is largely taken as suspect. The monopoly press is scared (although it is citing “patriotism” as a basis for opposition) because it believes it would no longer enjoy monopoly status with big players from the West arriving on the scene.

Its argument, however, sounds hollow with already a 100% FDI for internet and substantial foreign investment in TV. Rupert Murdoch is already here, his Star TV beamed into most television-owning homes across the length and breadth of the Subcontinent.

Indian political parties across the spectrum have opposed the move. From former Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) chief Kushabhau Thakre, to Samata Party spokesman Shambhu Srivastava, Congress spokesperson Anand Sharma, Trinamul Congress MP NK Sengupta, to Telugu Desam Party’s K Rama Mohan Rao, have vociferously attacked the government move. However, their credibility has been called in question.

To begin with the BJP, the party heading the National Democratic Alliance (NDA), which rules at the Center. On one hand, it has been campaigning for Swadeshi (literally, made in India), and on the other, supporting the World Bank-IMF agenda of globalization and Western expansion into national economy. As the party opposes FDI outside Parliament, its leaders in government have allowed FDI.

The Congress Party, whose government at Center opened the floodgates of foreign investment, liberalization and globalization in the mid-1990s, is now busy playing to the gallery, opposing the move. The other parties in NDA are only regional in nature and small players in national politics. They were never known for consistency.

This brings us to the only genuine opposition - India’s Left parties, which have been consistently opposed to foreign control of the economy or any other vital sector.

The Hindu Rashtriya Swayam Sevak Sangh (RSS - National Volunteer Corps), the parent organization of BJP and myriad other Hindu outfits, has been consistently opposing FDI in print, one of the reasons forwarded being preservation of “culture” from Western invasion. The RSS-BJP ideology is based on “cultural nationalism,” which excludes and demonizes Muslims, Christians and other minority religions born outside India.

There is silent support for FDI in print media as well. The newer and vibrant publications like India Today and Outlook are not scared. In fact, India Today’s publishers, Living Media, already publish Indian editions of foreign magazines like Cosmopolitan. There is also an Indian edition of Elle. Publishers of older publications like The Pioneer (nearly 125-year old) too support FDI in print just because the paper is no longer run by a monopoly.

The “cultural invasion” RSS and BJP talk about is no longer taken seriously as the “invasion” is already complete in the form of internet, TV and Western films widely accessible, at least in the larger cities.

One important argument in favor of FDI in print is that it is more professional and fair in reporting and is not half as vicious about Muslims, mullas, mosques and madrasahs as many in Indian print media are.

Foreign competition has, however, improved standards of technology in India, ranging from cars to agricultural products like tractors and thrashers, from consumer goods to computer software.

 

Yesterday's News

Search Articles 

 

 

News Archive :
Day:   Month: Year:   


Send Mail

News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Politics in Depth | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims | IOL Radio

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map