ÚÑÈí
 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 

Search »

Advanced Search »

 


Palestinian Leaders Do Not Come From Washington: Erakat

“The real issue is we need is to specify a road map… to end the [Israeli] occupation” Erakat said.

OCCUPIED JERUSALEM, June 25 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) - U.S. President George W. Bush put joy in the hearts of Israelis with his long-awaited speech outlining his policy regarding the Middle East. But in the Arab world, the speech was met with reactions ranging from plain outrage to measured politeness.

Emboldened by Bush’s speech, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon reiterated Tuesday, June 25, his demand for changing the Palestinian leadership, Agence France-Presse (AFP) reported.

Sharon, a hard-line former general who has on one occasion said he regretted not killing his old foe Yasser Arafat in Lebanon 20 years, urged Bush, during a visit to Washington earlier this month, to dump the Palestinian President as a partner in the peace process.

Meanwhile, the Palestinians fumed at Bush’s speech. “It is only for the Palestinian people to determine who is their leader... and President Bush must respect the democratic choice of the Palestinian people,” chief Palestinian negotiator, Saeb Erakat, told CNN Monday, June 24.

“I cannot find President Bush’s statement acceptable,” Erakat said.

“President Arafat is the leader of the Palestinian people. He is the president of the Palestinian people,” he told CNN. “The Palestinian leaders do not come from Washington.”

“The real issue is we need is to specify a road map, as the president says, to end the [Israeli] occupation” of Palestinian territories, he said.

Erakat called for a clear timetable for Israel’s withdrawal from all lands in the West Bank and Gaza Strip seized in the June 1967 war with its Arab neighbors, plus a resolution of the Palestinian refugee problem.

“We need to take forward the vision that Bush spoke about in a way that guarantees the end of the Israeli occupation,” Erakat told AFP. “The problem is the Israeli occupation, which represents the highest form of terrorism.”

The official response from Arafat’s office, however, was measured politeness. Arafat made no comment on his own fate, and characterized the speech as “a serious effort to push the peace process forward.”

Some in Israel, however, echoed Erakat’s opinion. Israeli daily newspaper, Ha’aretz, reported that MK Ahmed Tibi, a former Arafat adviser, told Israel Radio that “Bush’s speech not only doesn’t lower the level of violence, I assess that it will raise the level of violence because the Palestinian response will be to increase support for Yasser Arafat...”

The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) said in a statement that Bush’s speech to lay out the conditions for Palestinian statehood was “unbalanced and biased in favor of the Israeli crimes committed against Palestinians.”

“The American administration is giving the green light to Ariel Sharon to liquidate the Palestinian cause,” said the resistance group, whose leader, Ahmed Saadat, has been imprisoned in the West Bank in connection with the killing of an extreme right-wing Israeli cabinet minister last year in retaliation for Israel’s earlier assassination of PFLP leader Abu Ali Mostafa.

The group said Bush’s “ideas on a Palestinian state express an Israeli-American vision which links its creation to the liquidation of the Intifada,” or the 21-month Palestinian uprising against Israeli occupation, AFP reported.

“Demanding a change in the Palestinian leadership constitutes flagrant interference in our affairs, since the Palestinian people are capable of electing their leaders,” the group said.   

In his speech, Bush lays out several prerequisites that the Palestinians must meet in order to create a “provisional” Palestinian state. The Palestinians, Bush said, must elect a “new and different Palestinian leadership” and adopt a new constitution with a full empowered parliament, local-level governments and independent judiciary; in other words, Palestinian President Yasser Arafat must go.

The Palestinians must also implement reforms, including auditing to ensure what Bush termed as “honest enterprise”. They are also being asked to undertake an externally supervised overhaul of security and police forces that can dismantle the so-called “terrorist groups” – that is, do everything they can to stop resistance to Israeli occupation.

Meanwhile, Israel was asked to withdraw its forces to positions it held in the West Bank September 28, 2000, and to stop building illegal Jewish settlements on the West Bank and in Gaza. Israel must also restore the freedom of movement in the Palestinian areas, as well as release frozen Palestinian revenues into what Bush called as “honest, accountable hands.”

Bush gave Israel the green light to liquidate the Palestinian cause: PFLP

The Arab states were also given their to-do list. They must build closer diplomatic and commercial ties with Israel, leading to the “full normalization of relations between Israel and the entire Arab world”, stop the flow of money, supplies and recruits to resistance groups such as the Islamic Resistance Movement Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and Hezbollah, and block the shipment of Iranian supplies to these groups.

Bush also called on Syria to close so-called “terrorist camps” and expel so-called “terrorist organizations.”

“George Bush today, also after this speech, and after months of dealing with the Middle East, is the most hated person among Palestinians. He is competing with Ariel Sharon for this title,” Tibi said.

Click here to read the full text of Bush’s speech

 

Yesterday's News

Search Articles 

 

 

News Archive :
Day:   Month: Year:   


Send Mail

News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Politics in Depth | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims | IOL Radio

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map