WASHINGTON,
June 16 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) – U.S. congressional
leaders voiced support Sunday, June 16, for plans to topple, or if
necessary kill, Iraqi President Saddam Hussein through covert actions
in what was termed Monday, June 17, by Iraqi Foreign Minister Naji
Sabri as "nothing new".
"It's
nothing new," Sabri told journalists after a Washington Post
report Sunday said that U.S. President George W. Bush had directed the
CIA to undertake a comprehensive, covert program to overthrow Saddam
this year, including authority to use lethal force, Agence
France-Presse (AFP) reported.
"The
United States has plotted against Iraq for more than 30 years and
plots against any country in the world which demonstrates
independence," Sabri said.
"From
time to time, the United States presents its policy with a misleading
appearance to dupe [American] public opinion," the minister
added.
Congressional
support of a U.S. plan to topple or kill the president of Iraq took
different shapes.
"I
think there is broad support for a regime change in Iraq," Senate
Majority Leader Tom Daschle told Fox News. "The question is, how
do we do it and when do we do it?"
Daschle
said Washington should "keep our eye on the ball," and not
lose focus on toppling Al-Qaeda, adding: "We want to work with
the administration and try to find the best way and the best
time" to outs the Iraqi President.
Senator
John McCain agreed that Saddam should be removed from power and called
on the United States "to be prepared to do whatever is necessary
to bring about this regime change." But he said he doubted that
covert actions would be enough.
"I
don't know if we can succeed or not, and I would guess that the
experts would tell you the odds are against it succeeding with just
covert activity, support for opposition within," he told CBS
news, suggesting that a larger scale offensive would be necessary.
Asked
about White House comments that Bush has no war plans on his desk,
McCain laughed.
"Well,
in all due respect, that's probably technically correct. They're
probably not on his desk. They're probably on somebody's desk down the
hall," he said.
"I
mean there's all kinds of contingency plans and appropriately so, even
in some very far-fetched scenarios,” he said.
Daschle
added that the U.S. should have “contingency plans” for what he
termed as a “threat,” in what sounded like the latest U.S. pretext
for launching a fresh strike on 11-year-sanctions-hit Iraq.
"We
should try to do it first covertly or with special operations but, if
not, be prepared to do what's necessary," he said of the plan to
oust or kill Saddam.
Republican
Congressman Dick Armey, the House majority leader, told ABC news that
he supported the president's initiative.
"We
understand that Saddam Hussein harbors, fosters, financially supports
terrorism, and ... the Bush principle is that if you do these things,
you are a terrorist and you must be dealt with," he said, echoing
recent discourse on a so-called war on terror.
Speaking
on ABC's program, House Minority Leader Richard A. Gephardt (D-Mo.)
said covert U.S. efforts make sense in the face of Iraq's alleged
pursuit of weapons of mass destruction and refusal to comply with U.N.
resolutions requiring it to submit to international weapons
inspections.
“It's
trying to bring about a change of regime, because they have continued
to flout U.N. resolutions and international law,” the Post quoted
Gephardt as saying. “I think it is an appropriate action to take. I
hope it succeeds in its quest.”
None
of the congressmen saw the U.S. plan against Saddam as a change in
U.S. policy that precludes American forces from assassinating foreign
leaders.
Sen.
Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.) agreed that the administration must be
ready to take overt action to remove Hussein if the covert strategy
fails. At the same time, Biden, who chairs the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee, sounded cautionary notes, warning that American
forces may have to remain in Iraq for years to keep the peace once
Hussein is toppled, the paper said.
"What
are we going to do after we take him down, so that the Kurds and the
Turks aren't in a war, that the Shias in the south and the Iranians
aren't back at it again, and so on and so forth?" Biden asked on
"Face the Nation." He said the administration needs to agree
on a vision for Iraq's future.
Even
as congressional leaders applauded the expanded covert efforts,
Alabama Sen. Richard C. Shelby, the ranking Republican on the Senate
intelligence committee, said CIA Director George J. Tenet should be
replaced. "I think we could do better. I've always thought
that," Shelby said on CNN's "Late Edition."
The
presidential order, an expansion of a previous presidential finding
designed to oust Saddam, directs the Central Intelligence Agency to
use all available tools, including the possible use of U.S. Special
Forces teams in the operation and authorization to kill the Iraqi
president if they were acting in self-defense, AFP said.
The
administration has allocated tens of millions of dollars to the covert
program, according to the Post.
Sources
told the Post that the CIA initiative was part of a broader
Bush administration plan to remove Saddam, ranging from economic
pressure to diplomacy and possible military action on a large scale.
Meanwhile,
Iraq said Sunday, June 16, 2002, it hopes that next month's talks with
the United Nations on outstanding issues, notably the return of U.N.
arms inspectors, would lead to a comprehensive settlement between the
two sides, AFP said.
"Dialogue
must aim for a comprehensive solution and not towards the settlement
of certain aspects of the problem without resolving the background of
it," a government spokesman told the official INA news agency.
The
spokesman was talking after a meeting between President Saddam Hussein
and his senior officials focused on the "agenda for the upcoming
round of talks with U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan," scheduled
for July 4-5 in Vienna.
Iraq
will send a message to Annan to demand responses to the questions
Baghdad addressed to the Security Council in March during a first
round of talks between the U.N. chief and the Iraqi Foreign Minister,
he said.
These
questions focused notably on ways of resuming weapons inspections in
Iraq and how the U.N. could guarantee that arms inspectors would not
spy for the United States.
"From
the first round of talks, Iraq presented the U.N. secretary general a
number of fundamental questions so he could submit them to the U.N.
Security Council, but we have not received a response to this
day," the spokesman said.
An
agreement on the resumption of weapons inspections after a three-year
hiatus to "refute U.S. lies on weapons of mass destruction"
that Iraq is accused of possessing and developing, could come within
the framework of a "real settlement foreseeing the total lifting
of the embargo."
Annan
and Sabri met March 7 at U.N. headquarters in New York to discuss the
possible return of arms inspectors to Iraq. They and their senior
aides had a second round of talks May 1-3.