Your Mail

ÚÑÈí

 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 


Lindh Was Not Informed Of His Rights: Attorney 

Attorneys say Lindh’s confessions were made under torture pressure

ALEXANDRIA, June 15 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) - Defense attorneys for John Walker Lindh, in a motion to suppress evidence, stated that U.S. authorities in Afghanistan failed to advise him of his legal rights and ignored his pleas for a lawyer, and urged a judge Friday to suppress statements the defendant made while held in Afghanistan. 

The motion filing comes ahead of a Monday hearing for Lindh in U.S. District Court, where his lawyers will seek to have the entire case thrown out, reports CNN. 

In an attempt to bar the use of statements made while interrogated in Afghanistan in court, defense attorneys said Walker Lindh was "repeatedly interrogated without any attempt to advise him of his Fifth Amendment rights," contending that "any statements elicited without Miranda warnings cannot be used against Mr. Lindh in this criminal proceeding." 

Miranda warnings are the explicit reading of rights to anyone charged and arrested for a crime which states that they have a right to an attorney during questioning, that if he cannot afford an attorney one will provided for him, the right to remain silent, and that any statements they make to law enforcement authorities may be used against them in a court of law. The Miranda warnings are there to advise the arrested of their rights and that they can choose to say nothing. 

Lindh’s attorneys assert he was never read these rights last December when he was captured and interrogated, and that he repeatedly asked for an attorney, but that interrogators said there was none available. He was also not informed that his parents retained counsel for him in the United States. 

"The law is clear that any statements elicited without Miranda warnings cannot be used against Mr. Lindh in this criminal proceeding," the motion said. 

The U.S. government acknowledges that Lindh's statements were heavily relied upon in his indictment, which charged him with conspiring to murder Americans and aiding the Taliban and al-Qaeda, reports news agencies. 

The government’s complaint states that Lindh told the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) that he personally met Osama bin Laden and was aware in June that al-Qaeda was sending people to the U.S. to carry out attacks. 

The unique legal issue arising from the defense’s motion is of whether a U.S. citizen is entitled to rights like Miranda when he is captured as a soldier fighting against the U.S., and not brought to the U.S. criminal system at that moment. 

Defense attorneys assert that Lindh’s signed waiver of his rights when questioned by an FBI agent in Afghanistan were made under periods and conditions of duress. During those days in December, Lindh was while blindfolded, shackled and bound to a stretcher after spending two days in a metal shipping container with neither heat nor light, the motion said. 

"He was sleep-deprived, malnourished, hungry and in pain, with a bullet and shrapnel still lodged in his body," the motion said. "Mr. Lindh reasonably perceived that only by signing the form could he hope for relief from the oppressive conditions of captivity." 

As a result, Lindh emerged "completely intimidated, broken mentally and physically," his lawyers contend.

Yesterday's News

Search Articles 

 

 

News Archive :
Day:   Month: Year:   


Send Mail

News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Politics In Depth | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map