ÚÑÈí
 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 

Search »

Advanced Search »

 


Nuclear Arms Reduction Treaty No Longer Binding: Russia

Bush and Putin shake hands upon signing the Treaty of Moscow at the Kremlin May 24, 2002

MOSCOW , June 14 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) – Russia tore up Friday, June 14, the 1993 START II treaty, a nuclear arms reductions pact it said was made irrelevant by U.S. missile defense plans, considering the treaty no longer binding anymore.

Russia sees no conditions in which the START II (Strategic Arms Reduction Talks) treaty can take effect and no longer feels bound under international law” to observe its terms, the foreign ministry said in a statement, Agence France-Presse (AFP) said.

The move comes a day after the official expiry of the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) treaty which was abrogated unilaterally by the United States December, 2002.

It also follows the May 24, 2002 signing by the Russian and U.S. presidents Vladimir Putin and George W. Bush of an arms cuts agreement in which they pledged to slash their offensive weapons arsenals by two-thirds over the next decade.

The START II treaty, signed in January 1993 by Russian and U.S. presidents Boris Yeltsin and George Bush, stipulated a two-thirds reduction in the two countries’ nuclear arsenals.

Further protocols were added to the treaty in New York in September 1997.

“The United States declined to ratify START II and the New York agreements, and moreover withdrew on June 13 from the ABM treaty, thus invalidating that cornerstone of strategic stability for three decades,” the ministry said.

Ratified by the United States in 1996 and by Russia in May 2000, the treaty had originally been due to take effect at the end of 2003 but had been widely regarded as overtaken by events following the U.S. decision to withdraw from the ABM treaty.

Russian analysts have been predicting for several months that START II would now never come into force, and Sergei Rogov of the U.S.A.-Canada Institute said that even the START I treaty signed in July 1991 by Bush and Soviet president Mikhail Gorbachev could no longer be considered binding, AFP said.

“In the ratification text passed by the State Duma [lower house], it says START I remains in force only as long as the ABM is in force too,” he said.

Russia , which considers the ABM to have been the linchpin of strategic stability since 1972, has described the U.S. decision to abrogate the treaty in order to build a missile defense system, as a “mistake.”

Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov meanwhile said Russia would not retaliate for the U.S. withdrawal from the ABM treaty.

Speaking during a visit to Kyrgyzstan , he told reporters that “the U.S. national missile defense system exists in virtual space, not in reality. So there is no need for retaliation,” Interfax quoted him as saying, AFP reported.

“There is no telling how the situation in missile defense will develop,” he added.

 

Yesterday's News

Search Articles 

 

 

News Archive :
Day:   Month: Year:   


Send Mail

News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Politics in Depth | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims | IOL Radio

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map