Your Mail

ÚÑÈí

 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 

Search »

Advanced Search »

 


U.S. And Russia Sign Nuclear Arms Reduction Treaty

Bush and Putin (L) shake hands after signing the Nuclear Arms Treaty. 

MOSCOW, May 24 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) – The Russian and U.S. presidents have signed a landmark Nuclear Arms Treaty, which slashes the two countries' arsenals by two-thirds.

President Vladimir Putin and President George W. Bush signed the deal in a ceremony in the Kremlin.

The agreement - the first major nuclear disarmament deal for almost 10 years - has been hailed by the Americans as banishing the legacy of the Cold War.

Speaking after the signing, President Bush said the treaty would "liquidate the legacy of nuclear hostility between our two countries," BBC’s online news service reported.

The treaty aims to cut the nuclear arsenals of each side from current levels of between 6,000 and 7,000 to between 1,700 and 2,200 over the next 10 years.

Bush said he was determined to get the U.S. Congress to lift the 1974 Jackson-Vanik agreement, which restrict normal trade relations with Russia, BBC added.

President Putin hailed a "completely new quality" in Russia's relationship with the U.S.

The three-day summit is the fifth between the heads of state of the two once-bitter-foes-now-turned-partners, but their first meeting on Russian soil.

Bush arrived late Thursday, May 23, in the Russian capital amid high security for the Kremlin summit.

Shortly before arriving in Moscow, where hundreds of Russians staged a noisy protest at the U.S. Embassy, Bush said the signing of the treaty would rid Russia and the United States "of the last vestiges of Cold War confrontation," according to CNN.

CNN said Bush also warned Putin to stop providing weapons technology to Iran. "If you arm Iran, you're liable to have the weapons pointed at you," he claimed.

He added he planned to tell Putin to handle Iran with caution, and to express U.S. worries that Iran may someday be capable of arming missiles. "That's going to be a problem for all of us, including Russia," Bush said.

Russia has been helping Iran build the Bushehr civilian nuclear power plant, which on Thursday a Bush aide singled out from among many nuclear power plants in the region – including in Israel, as allegedly the “most important proliferation threat there is."

Iran says the plant is for peaceful purposes, and Russia has rejected the U.S. allegations as "groundless," said CNN.

On Friday at the summit with Bush, Putin emphasized that Russia’s nuclear cooperation with Iran does not harm efforts to prevent nuclear weapons proliferation.

 “Russia’s cooperation with Iran does not harm the non-proliferation process,” AFP quoted him as saying.

The meeting between the two leaders is expected to see the clinch of a new strategic partnership accord, effectively drawing a line under the mutual suspicion and nuclear rivalry of the Cold War era.

However, the two leaders still disagree on a number of issues. Moscow is eager to secure Russia's entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO), and to attract greater U.S. investment in its economy as well as cooperation with the United States in exporting Caspian Sea oil, Agence France-Presse (AFP) said.

Putin is also expected to press the U.S. president for assurances that an agreement 10 days ago to give Russia an unprecedented voice within NATO is only the first step in Moscow's integration within the Alliance.

At the same time, Bush is likely to seek guarantees on the control of Russian nuclear technology, which some Pentagon hawks fear could allegedly slip into the hands of groups and countries the U.S. describes as terrorist.

Putin is looking for Bush to help Russia gain the status of a free-market economy entitling it to U.S. trade benefits a decade after the fall of the Soviet Union, AFP said.

"The United States is a key partner for [Russian] investments and trade agreements. The economy will be a key topic" at the summit, Putin told a meeting of top entrepreneurs on the eve of the summit.

Discussion of Russia's hoped-for market economy status would be "an important item on the agenda," Putin added.

Moscow was bracing itself for a likely disappointment that Bush would make no promises of action to lift a Soviet-era amendment barring Washington from delivering favorable U.S. trade tariffs to its Cold War-era foe.

Moves in the U.S. Congress to "graduate" Russia from the Jackson-Vanik amendment, a 1974 law penalizing Moscow for its restrictions on the movement of Soviet Jews, have stalled amid a bitter dispute over U.S. poultry exports.

The U.S. Senate, while supporting granting Russia permanent normal trade relations, said Thursday it would only lift the amendment strengthening U.S.-Russia relations "at the appropriate time," AFP reported.

Putin lamented the decision, saying: "The Congress has postponed examining the Jackson Vanik agreement. This is a strange decision."

Meanwhile, the Communists and their nationalist supporters attacked the Russia-U.S. disarmament treaty as a humiliation for Moscow that would leave Washington with a massive advantage in nuclear and other defense potential. 

Putin is trying to turn Russia "into a U.S. satellite," said Communist Party leader Gennady Zyuganov, as 250 of his supporters picketed the U.S. embassy compound, some holding signs that read "The Destruction of Our Defense." 

But the Russian army took a friendlier approach, with the official defense ministry newspaper Krasnaya Zvezda running a cozy interview with the U.S. president under the headline: "George Bush: We are no longer enemies." 

"Russian generals are being turned face-forward toward the West," observed Izvestia daily in an article explaining that the Russian brass was now being briefed about their new role in an era of cooperation with Washington. 

And even firebrand nationalists like Vladimir Zhirinovsky, who only years ago spoke of expanding the Russian empire from the Atlantic to the Indian Ocean, said he was "very optimistic" about the Bush summit. 

"I had criticized a policy of sucking up to Washington in the past, but since September 11, they have themselves sought to cooperate with us. Why should we push them away?" 

 

Yesterday's News

Search Articles 

 

 

News Archive :
Day:   Month: Year:   


Send Mail

News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Muslim Affairs | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map