WASHINGTON,
May 23 (IslamOnline) – Muslims in Europe have suffered “increased
hostility” in racist and xenophobic attacks since the September 11
attacks on the U.S., according to a report released Thursday, May 23,
by a European racism-monitoring body.
“The
report’s findings show that Islamic communities and other vulnerable
groups have become targets of increased hostility since 11
September,” said Bob Purkiss, the chair of the European Monitoring
Center on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC).
“A
greater sense of fear among the general population has exacerbated
already existing prejudices and fuelled acts of aggression and
harassment across Europe.”
The
new report, entitled “Islamophobia in the EU,” which was presented
at the European Commission, reviews changes in attitudes and acts
against Muslims from September 11 until the end of the year 2001,
according to an EUMC press release.
"An
atmosphere has been created where Muslims have to justify themselves
that they are not terrorists," Beate Winkler, director of the
Vienna-based EUMC, was quoted as saying in a report by Agence
France-Presse (AFP).
"There
have been verbal attacks widely reported in all [European Union]
member states," she said during a press conference.
"Especially, women and young people in schools have been victims
and targets" of these attacks.
The
EUMC began a program of monitoring racism against Muslims September
12, 2001, according to the report. National Focal Points (NFP’s) in
each of the 15 EU member states were asked to look at acts of violence
and aggression, as well as changes in attitude, of the EU populations
towards Muslims and any other group that might become a new target
related to the events of September 11.
Racism
and xenophobia against Muslims and others after September 11 were more
prominent in Britain, Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden, Winkler
said in the AFP report; in other states, notably Austria, Germany,
Greece, Italy, Luxembourg and Portugal, little increase in xenophobic
sentiment from before September 11 was noted.
Many
of the different NFP’s noted that such increases stemmed from
xenophobic attitudes that were already prevalent in their societies.
Denmark
noted that “much of what occurred post-September 11 drew heavily
upon pre-existent manifestations of widespread Islamophobic and
xenophobic attitudes.”
In
Denmark, Austria, Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands, among others,
the separate country reports noted that women who wore hijab
(Islamic headcovering) were particularly vulnerable to attacks because
they were “visually identifiable” as Muslims.
“The
hijab seems to have become the primary visual identifier as a
target for hatred,” the report said, “with Muslim women being
routinely abused and attacked across those countries in the EU where
Muslim women could be identified in this way.”
This
occurred even in Portugal, although it was limited to verbal assaults
– in other countries, Muslim women were reported to have been spat
at or had their hijabs ripped off. But in Portugal, the NFP
related the extremely low levels of hostility to “the historical
relationship between Portugal and Islam [and] the integration of
Portuguese Muslims into wider society.”
Other
acts of aggression included death threats, vandalism and destruction
of mosques and other Muslim establishments, stereotyped media reports
and a sharp increase in anti-Islam messages and postings on the
Internet.
However,
the report also took note of positive reactions and steps taken by EU
populations, such as appeals from government officials and interfaith,
intercultural dialogues.
In
Sweden, a “Swedish Committee Against Islamophobia” was launched;
the UK’s NFP cited “sensitive policing and co-operation in crime
prevention between police forces and local Muslim communities” as a
factor in reducing attacks while Prime Minister Tony Blair condemned
such attacks very strongly; and Austria’s NFP found that dialogues
between Muslim and Christian communities in Vienna opened a range of
seminars and discussions.
The
report makes recommendations to the EU nations based on these
“examples of good practice in overcoming fears and tackling
prejudice,” calling on communities to host cultural events,
universities to host lectures and discussions and other faith
communities to get involved in interfaith programs.