ÚÑÈí
 

Counseling:

Ask the Scholar

|

Ask About Islam

|

Hajj & `Umrah

|

Cyber Counselor

|

Parenting Counselor

 

Search »

Advanced Search »

 


BUSH WARNS NORTHERN ALLIANCE TO BACK OFF KABUL

NEW YORK, Nov. 11 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) – U.S. President George W. Bush warned the Afghan opposition against trying to capture the capital, Kabul, from the ruling Taliban movement.

The Northern Alliance (NA) captured the city of Mazar-e-Sharif on Friday. They claim that Taliban forces are retreating across a broad area of northern Afghanistan.

"We will encourage our friends to head south... but not into the city of Kabul itself," Bush said at a news conference at the United Nations in New York, reported BBC’s online service.

He warned that if the opposition entered Kabul, it might endanger hopes for a future broad-based government for the country.

The Northern Alliance, meanwhile, says that while there should be agreement on a post-Taliban government first, it could enter the capital in case of a "political vacuum".

Northern Alliance Foreign Minister Abdullah Abdullah said: "We would also prefer to achieve a broad political agreement between all groups before moving into Kabul."

"But we do not commit ourselves to this if there is a political vacuum in Kabul," he added. 

Washington Post reported Sunday that having first focused on winning over southern leaders of the Pashtuns, the dominant ethnic group in the country, the U.S. approach now is to use Special Forces on the ground and bombers in the air to bolster rebel forces attacking Taliban strongholds.

With the fall of Mazar-e-Sharif, the Post quoted a senior U.S. defense official as saying, “the Pentagon plans to take that tactic to other parts of the country.

"That strategy seems to be working," the source added. "Once we get the ability to coordinate air strikes, it gets pretty effective."

The new U.S. action in the west of Afghanistan underscores how the U.S. military strategy has evolved considerably since warplanes began bombing five weeks ago, despite repeated statements from the Bush administration that the war on terrorism is proceeding according to plan.

Early this month, the United States began to fight a different, more intense kind of war that more fully-embraced the opposition Northern Alliance, along with trying to encourage defections among Pashtuns supporting the ruling Taliban.

The changing strategy highlights the improvisational nature of the U.S. engagement in Afghanistan. Having initially-backed a plan to knock off the Taliban quickly, the Pentagon appears to be settling in for the long haul while looking for chances to kill large numbers of Taliban soldiers and members of bin Laden's al Qaeda network, said the Post.

"It is a plan that . . . looks for creating opportunities, it looks for exploiting opportunities," Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz said Friday. "It's a strategy rather than a blueprint."

Political and diplomatic considerations have also muddied the first month's strategy. The U.S. desire to make a new Afghan government home-grown, combined with the need to satisfy Pakistan's desire for ethnic Pashtuns to play a key role in a new regime, led the administration to adopt a "southern strategy" of trying to peel off Taliban members or allies, said the Post.

Also, the capture of Mazar-e-Sharif by Northern Alliance forces may raise concerns in Islamabad.

Many Pakistanis view the military progress on the ground as frustratingly slow - all the more so because at the start of the air strikes. Pakistani President Musharraf repeatedly promised his people this action would be "short, sharp and targeted.”

It is a promise which has been increasingly called into question as the weeks have passed and evidence has emerged of growing numbers of civilian casualties.

The fall of Mazar-e-Sharif is a definite sign of progress - but it raises other questions.

It throws into relief the frustratingly slow diplomatic moves towards establishing an acceptable political alternative to the Taliban in Afghanistan as a whole. It is not what Islamabad has in mind for the post Taliban era, BBC reported.

The Northern Alliance is viewed with suspicion by Islamabad - and as its forces take control of a strategically important city - albeit as a result of U.S. support - Pakistan may feel some unease.

Pakistani politicians are pressing for a multi-ethnic, broad-based political alliance which might have a real chance of bringing to an end the instability and bloodshed which have plagued Afghanistan for so long.

To their mind, it would be an alliance in which the Northern Alliance is not allowed to assume too dominant a role.

Anti-Taliban forces, meanwhile, consolidated their gains in northern Afghanistan on Sunday, Agence France-Presse (AFP) reported.

Afghanistan's ruling Taliban confirmed that their forces withdrew from three northern provinces - Samangan, Sar-e Pul and Jauzjan, but described the move as a "tactical withdrawal," reported Afghan Islamic Press.

"Our forces are regrouping," a Taliban spokesman told the Pakistan-based AIP.

"There is nothing to worry about. We left these places as part of our strategy."

The Taliban had previously acknowledged abandoning Balkh province and its capital, the key city of Mazar-e-Sharif. But the spokesman Sunday denied that Faryab province to the west had fallen to the opposition forces, AIP said.

 

Yesterday's News  

Search Articles 

News Archive :
Day:   Month: Year:   


Send Mail

News | Shari`ah | Health & Science | Politics in Depth | Reading Islam | Family | Culture | Youth | Euro-Muslims | IOL Radio

About Us | Speech of Sheikh Qaradawi | Contact Us | Advertise | Support IOL | Site Map