|
We
all know that the Hijri calendar began with the Hijrah, the
migration of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him)
from Makkah to Madinah. There are many lessons to be learned
from Hijrah. Today's sermon will touch upon one of the most
important lessons, and that is the Prophet's approach in
dealing with two very different societies — the
polytheistic Makkan society before Hijrah and the Islamic
society in Madinah.
In
both encounters, history tells us that the Prophet never
compromised Islamic principles. These principles are the
building block of Islam. Without them, Islam will simply
cease to be the one and true religion preferred by Allah.
These
principles are of four types. The first type is the central
tenets of Islamic beliefs, such as believing in Allah, the
prophets, and the hereafter. The second type is the
compulsory acts of worship, such as prayer, fasting, zakah,
and Hajj. The third type is Islamic moral values. And the
fourth type is termed as the unchanging Islamic laws.
If
we look back at history, we will find that the Prophet
(peace and blessings be upon him) never compromised any of
these four principles. For example, the Prophet never once
compromised the central tenets of Islamic belief, neither
during the time he was in Makkah before the Hijrah, nor when
he was in Madinah after the Hijrah. During his time in
Makkah before the Hijrah, when he was calling his people to
worship Allah and not the idols they created, the leaders of
the Quraish tried to negotiate with him. They would
willingly worship Allah for one year, but on the condition
that the Prophet and other Muslims worship their idols for
one year. They thought that it was a very good deal,
adopting each other's belief for one year. In this way, they
could have lived harmoniously side by side with the Muslims
in Makkah.
How
wrong they were! Immediately the verses of Surat Al-Kafirun
were revealed by Allah, as an answer to their request. Allah
says:
[Say
O Unbelievers! I worship not that which you worship. Nor
will you worship that which I worship. And I shall not
worship that which you are worshiping. Nor will you
worship that which I worship. To you be your religion, and
to me my religion.]
(Al-Kafirun 109:1-6)
This
firmness concerning Islamic worship and tawheed
(belief in the oneness of Allah), remained even after
Hijrah. Never once did the Prophet compromise the basic
tenets of Islam. Prayer (salah) was obligatory before
the Hijrah, even though it was difficult to perform because
of abuse and intimidation from the unbelievers. And prayer
remained obligatory after the Hijrah, even after the Muslim
Ummah in Madinah managed to perform it peacefully. Nobody
came to the Prophet and said, "Now that we are a strong
community, and we don't have to fear any intimidation from
the unbelievers, let us reduce the number of prayers. We
have better things to do like strengthening our
community."
There
is no compromise over prayer. The five compulsory prayers
must be performed in whatever condition we are in. Even if
we cannot stand, we must do it sitting down. If we can't
find water for our ablution, we can do dry ablution. If we
are forcefully hindered from performing it, we must make up
for it later when we are free. There is no compromise on
prayer, as much as there is no compromise on the other fixed
principle, that is, the Islamic moral values.
In
this regard, the Prophet showed to us how important it is to
adhere to our moral values, in whatever surrounding and
circumstances. For example, the Prophet led a modest life in
Makkah when the unbelievers tried all means to undermine his
da`wah even after Hijrah, when he was accorded the
proper and highest respect. He was never arrogant and never
looked down on other people. In fact, he went out of his way
to help the poor and destitute, be they men, women, or
children.
That
is an example we should all emulate and follow: to adhere to
the unchanged principles of Islam, even though the world
around us changes. We cannot compromise on those principles.
For if we do, Islam will cease to be Islam for us.
So
there is no compromise on the six articles of faith. There
is no compromise on the five articles of Islam. There is no
compromise on the Islamic moral values. There is no
compromise on the fixed Islamic laws.
My
brothers and sisters in Islam, even though there is no
compromise on those fixed four principles of Islam, we
should know that Islam is also a way of life and a system of
belief that is relevant for every situation and across time.
Islam is not something that is confined by a certain
environment and a fixed period of time. Thus, in Islamic
jurisprudence, there is what is termed as ath-thawabit,
the unchanged principles, and al-mutaghaiyirat, the
evolving rules and regulations.
Evolving
rules and regulations prove the flexibility of Islamic
jurisprudence to change according to every situation and
condition. It allows Islamic jurisprudence to be relevant
for all times. But do remember that the evolving rules and
regulations are different from the unchangeable principles.
The evolving rules and regulations are those that the
jurists differ about. These differences arise from their
approaches, their ijtihad (personal reasoning) and
their understanding of the Islamic Shari`ah. They differ
about the best method of implementing the Islamic Shari`ah.
So
we should not blame others who follow a different school of
law or accuse them of not following the Islamic Shari`ah, or
being astray because those differences are in the area open
to differences. This reflects the flexibility of the Islamic
Shari`ah to cope with each and every situation. For example,
we should not blame those who do not recite qunut
[du`aa' recited before or after the first ruku` in
prayers] in Fajr prayer as not following the Islamic
Shari`ah. Nor should we blame those who do recite qunut
in Fajr prayer as not properly following the Islamic
Shari`ah. We should not blame Muslim women who do not cover
their face with a veil as not following the Islamic
Shari`ah, nor should we blame those who do cover their face.
All
these, my brothers and sisters, fall in the category open to
ijtihad and the differences among the scholars.
|