|
|
A poster of Huda Ghaliya, whose family was killed in an Israeli strike on a Gaza beach on June 9 (Reuters photo)
|
The June 25 Palestinian fighters’ raid on
an Israeli military post near the Gaza-Egypt border has sent Israel
“scrambling to defend itself,” the voice of a BBC News reporter
declared on the evening news.
The report was followed by an unchallenging
interview with a spokesman for the Israeli foreign ministry, then
another with an Israeli daily newspaper reporter in Washington. No
Palestinian voice was heard for days. The two Israelis communicated
the same tired, albeit ominous discourse that seems to understand,
thus convey, any event based on the assumption that only Israeli lives
matter.
There was hardly any international news
source in English — including those originating from Arab countries
— that accepted the Palestinian predawn attack on the Israeli
military base as a clear act of retaliation and a dignified one at
that. After all, Israel has murdered scores of Palestinian civilians
in the past few weeks, while Palestinians have refrained from
following the same course, instead targeting the same Israeli soldiers
who inflicted untold hurt on the residents of Gaza.
Could it be possible that Middle East arms
of major news media outlets have mistakenly overlooked what has been
happening in the Gaza Strip since the supposed Israeli withdrawal in
September 2005?
It all started with extremely loud sonic
booms, mock bombardments, and Israeli fighter jets flying low over the
overpopulated and impoverished Gaza Strip. Palestinians called on the
international community to interfere to stop Israeli provocations.
Their calls, as usual, fell on deaf ears.
|
Western media coined
mantras to justify why ordinary
Palestinians must suffer for choosing a
parliament in a democratic election. |
With such scare tactics,
Israel wished to convey to Palestinians a loud and clear message:
There is nothing for you to celebrate; we are still the masters of
your destiny, and unlike the South Lebanon 2000 withdrawal, we are
leaving Gaza triumphantly, and possibly just temporarily.
Soon, Israel’s mock attacks became more
genuine, while the international community continued to turn a blind
eye to what would soon become another routine in "liberated"
Gaza. As far the media was concerned, there was hardly much to report,
since Hamas, along with other Palestinian factions, refused to respond
to the provocations with violent retaliation, confining themselves to
a unilateral ceasefire they had reached with the Palestinian
president, Mahmoud Abbas, in Cairo earlier.
Fed up the with the Palestinian response
— or lack thereof — Israeli officials coupled their scare tactics
with menacing threats, with a bottom line that no Palestinian was
immune from Israeli targeted assassinations.
In an interesting turn of events, Hamas won
the parliamentary elections in January 2006 — in an astounding
display of transparency. John Hughes of the Christian Science
Monitor echoed the mainstream media line that something went
horribly wrong in the Middle East and that the “Hamas victory is a
setback” to whatever imaginary peace process Hughes knows of.
|
Western media
equated blowing up Palestinian families
with alleged Palestinian rocket attacks. |
Comforted by the unconditional support of
the US government, Israel’s violent intimidation and scare tactics
became much more abound. This time, however, the Israeli war on the
Palestinians became an extension of an international one, led by the
United States, along with the ever-compliant United Nations and
European Union. While Western donors held back their aid to the point
of creating a humanitarian catastrophe in the Occupied Territories,
the United States led a campaign of political coercion — in a rare
display of unity between Democrats and Republicans, and all of
“Israel’s friends” in the media.
Western media quickly coined various
mantras to justify why ordinary Palestinians must suffer for choosing
a parliament in a democratic election: because Hamas refuses to
recognize Israel and renounce violence, among other pretexts that seem
to fit so well in Israel’s political agenda.
Top Israeli government advisor Dov
Weissglas, optimistic as he had always been, wished to see the humor
in starving Palestinians. "[The economic siege] is like an
appointment with a dietician. The Palestinians will get a lot thinner,
but they won't starve to death."
Apparently, Israel was enjoying the show
— getting the world to punish an occupied nation and, at the same
time, lose sight of Israel’s colonial expansion in the West Bank and
East Jerusalem.
Of course, Israel can never be content with
such limited roles. It was time to turn up the heat one more degree;
the sporadic violence was about to be upgraded to intense violence,
reaching Palestinian civilians of all ages. In the matter of seven
weeks — ending on June 21 with the killing of a pregnant woman, her
unborn child, and her brother, and injuring 14 of the same family —
Israel killed 90 Palestinians, the great majority of whom were
civilians. This included the June 9 killing of seven members of the
same family as they were picnicking at a beach near the Gaza town of
Beit Lahia.
Israeli Defense Minister Amir Peretz
justified the wanton killing of civilians as an unintended mistake,
vowing to continue to fight "terrorists," who fire homemade
rockets against the neighboring Israeli town of Sderot. In the same
period in which 90 Palestinians were killed and hundreds more maimed
and wounded, Israeli army radio reported one injury resulting from
rocket fire. No other source has confirmed the lone injury claim.
However, Western media, including the BBC,
is incessantly determined to equate blowing up Palestinian families
with alleged Palestinian rocket attacks: it’s a tit for tat, or so
it seems. It’s equally valid, according to media dictates, to starve
a nation because their government refuses to recognize its military
occupier.
The US administration defended the June 9
murder of a Gaza family as an Israeli right to defend itself. BBC
International refused to see the Palestinian attack on an Israeli
military installation on June 25 as a Palestinian right to
self-defense. To the contrary, it was Israel who once again went
“scrambling to defend itself." It’s unclear how many
Palestinians must die before Israel delivers a convincing “blow”
to its unruly neighbors, and before life goes back to the way it was
intended to be — Palestinians being starved, humiliated, and
slaughtered at the hands of Israel. Only then, shall Israel be safe
once more.