 |
 |
 |
| A
Dutch Designer’s Cause for the Hijab* |
|
|
“My
strong belief is that prejudice is caused by a lack of
information and interest. As a designer I want to trigger the
interest of others through my projects and give information
people otherwise might not be interested in. In this way I can
contribute to a better world and that’s what I think my
duty, as a Contextual Designer, should be.”
One
may wonder at such a politically charged statement on the Web
site of an industrial/conceptual designer. However, taking a
closer look at the work of innovative Dutch artist Cindy van
den Bremen reveals an exciting new perspective on how fashion
design can serve as a language of intercultural communication
and a means of integration. “Art for art’s sake” surely
has no place in Cindy’s creative ethos.
|
 |
 |
In Physical
Education Classes |
|
|
|
In
the mid 1990s-in the context of intensifying debates in the
Dutch media, centering around the hypothetical failure of
“multiculturalism” and the possible stagnating effect of
Islam on integration-the Dutch Commission of Equal Treatment
passed a verdict that allowed high schools to prohibit Muslim
girls to wear the headscarf in physical education classes if
this would compromise safety precautions. Muslim girls were
advised to wear a swim cap and a high turtleneck instead. Many
girls refused to wear headgear that would not fulfill the
Islamic modesty requirements and chose to skip physical
education classes altogether.
In
1999 the controversial verdict and the discussions still
raging around the headscarf in general caught the attention of
Cindy van den Bremen, then a graduate student in the Design
Academy of Eindhoven. Seeking inspiration for her graduation
project, the socially conscious student was struck by the
discriminating character of the Commission’s decision and
resolved to design a line of sport headscarves that would
conform to safety requirements as well to the Islamic dress
code.
Another
important motivation was to refute the persistent prejudice
that the headscarf is “forced upon” Muslim women by their
male relatives. Cindy’s idealistic intentions did not go
unchallenged; her supervisors, not unaffected by the common
prejudices about the oppressive nature of the headscarf,
initially did not see any benefit in such a project. To
convince them Cindy compiled a large number of quotes by
Muslim girls, confirming the headscarf to be their personal
choice.
Under
the name of “Capsters,” a collection of four unique and
trendy sport headscarves followed, each adapted in shape and
material to its particular purpose: tennis, skating, aerobics,
and outdoor. To make sure the Capsters would conform to the
needs of its target group and Islamic regulations, Cindy spoke
to many Muslim girls wearing the headscarf and sought counsel
with an imam.
Cindy
is acutely aware of the social and political implications,
which form an integral part of the concept for her designs,
and has tirelessly explained this to the puzzled media, who
were fascinated by this Dutch non-Muslim designer taking on
the cause of the hijab with such unprecedented creativity.
Cindy has since become a familiar face in the Dutch media as a
dedicated advocate for the freedom for women to cover or not.
|
 |
 |
Capsters: A
Unique Potential |
|
|
|
For
Cindy, design is very much a socially involved process and
potentially conflict resolving in its ability to approach a
social problem from a radically unconventional angle in order
to seek a compromise. This methodology is beautifully
exemplified by the Capsters, which present a compromise
between religious requirements and life in a modern Western
society. This is achieved, argues Cindy, by emphasizing the
accessorial function of her designs rather than their purely
religious function. Thus, her Capsters retain the religious
aura of the Islamic hijab and conform to its physical
requirements while at the same time having an own unique
character and look that could potentially be worn by
non-Muslims as well.
From
an orthodox Islamic perspective, the accessory approach may
defy part of the headscarf’s function to distinguish.
However, Cindy argues, the ultimate important outcome of this
strategy will be to liberate the hijab of its political,
ideological, and religious stigmas and thus make it more
socially acceptable in a non-Muslim society. In this way the
negative image of the headscarf will be neutralized and
eventually reversed as the headscarf itself becomes a means of
integration.
|
 |
 |
Sharing
Motives |
|
|
|
Since
the launch of the Capsters and the media attention generated
by it, Cindy has embarked on several important projects
focusing on intercultural dialogue and elaborating on the
theme of the hijab. In 2002 she published a book titled
Sharing Motives together with female photographer Giti
Entezami, presenting 25 portraits of Muslim women with a great
variety of Islamic head coverings accompanied by 25 quotes
illustrating their reasons to cover their hair. The
presentation of this publication traveled across the
Netherlands accompanied by an extensive program of debates and
lectures around the theme of the headscarf. The exposition
aimed at creating more understanding for Muslim women wearing
the hijab and making the Dutch public more familiar with their
lives and motivations. This project constituted a unique and
important endeavor at a time when ignorance of the hijab and
its meaning was regularly displayed by the media in the most
unsubtle and disheartening way.
Recently
Cindy has been employed to design a safe headscarf for Muslim
women working for the Service Judicial Institutions (for
example, as security personnel in prisons and other
penitential institutions). However, the scarves are still
shelved, awaiting a reluctant minister of justice to approve
their actual use.
In
the meantime Cindy is back in her studio working on a new line
of fashionable Capsters to conquer the wardrobes of modern,
fashion-conscious Muslim women. Her ultimate goal is to update
the collection twice every six months.
|
 |
 |
Capster On or
In the Head? |
|
|
|
In
spite of the avid national and international media attention
and many supportive reactions from Muslims as well as
non-Muslims, the Capsters have not yet reached the practical
status of a basic in the young Muslim woman’s wardrobe.
There
are a few possible factors that may clarify the moderate
practical success of the Capsters:
Obviously,
social and political pressures are not the primary factors
forming Muslim girls’ choice of dress. Although they
creatively adapt current European trends to Islamic
requirements, the main trend-setters of hijabi fashion are
self-evidently located within the Muslim community itself, and
just as much subject to globalization as Western fashion
trends; that is, Egyptian hijab styles tend to be popular with
the Muslim communities in the West because of Egypt’s
central cultural position in the Muslim world and satellite
TV. Likewise, Muslim women in the Netherlands tend to wear
headscarves produced in Turkey, and to a lesser extent
Morocco, because of the background of the respective Muslim
minorities there.
The
manner of pinning or wrapping the hijab has, nevertheless,
remained relatively constant and uniform because of both the
specific nature of the Islamic dress requirements as well as
the general conservatism of the Muslim community.
The
gap between the radically individualist designs of Cindy van
den Bremen’s Capsters and the generally traditional and
uniform tastes of the community-oriented Muslim minorities may
at present be just a bit too wide to bridge. Young Muslim
women are generally no less fashion-conscious than their
non-Muslim counterparts, and for them to massively adopt a
hijab that shows no close resemblance to either traditional
Islamic hijab styles or any item already worn by non-Muslims
is very unlikely without a major advertisement campaign that
is uniquely tailored to the particularities of the Muslim
community.
In
spite of these considerations, there is no doubt that the
concept of the Capsters and its underlying intention to
de-emphasize the heavy ideological load of the hijab and
reclaim the image of the Muslim woman as an independent and
involved citizen, has opened up a very important space in the
Dutch hijab discourse-a space that, if stretched wide enough
by eloquent and socially active Muslim women, may one day
define the entire debate.
|
 |
*
This
article is written by Rahma Bavelaar is assistant editor and
recently staff writer for islamonline.net. She holds MA in Oriental
and African Studies, School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS),
UK. You can reach her at shabeel02@yahoo.co.uk
|