|
Fabricated
Hadiths
Causes
of Fabrication
(Part
2 of 3)
|
By
Mohsen Haredy**
|
July
26, 2005
|
The
fabricated hadiths can be divided into two categories:
1.
Intentionally fabricated hadith, which is called hadith mawdu` (invented
or fabricated hadith), and
2.
Unintentionally fabricated hadith, which is referred to as hadith
batil (invalid hadith).
Causes
of Intentional Fabrication
1.
The Zanadiqah (Heretics)
2.
Political Differences
3.
Favor Seekers
4.
Storytellers
5.
Human Frailties
6.
Ignorant Ascetics
7.
Prejudice for One’s Own Town, Race or Imam
Causes
of Unintentional Fabrication
1.
Novelty
2.
Mistakes
3.
Inexactness
4.
Indirect Transmission
5.
Failure to Copy
6.
Lack of Qualification
7.
Lost Books
Causes
of Intentional Fabrication
1.
The Zanadiqah (Heretics)
The
term zanadiqah was defined as those who deny the validity
of prophecy. Al-Ghazali divided the zanadiqah into absolute
zanadiqah who deny the resurrection after death and the
existence of the Creator of the world, and specific zanadiqah
who recognize the existence of the Creator of the world but deny
knowledge of the details of that world (193). In some sources they
are referred to as those who do not believe in any of the divine
attributes of Allah (Al-`Iraqi 95). Some give the word zindiq (singular
of zanadiqah) to the adherent of the thanawiyyah who
believe in the two forces of Light and Darkness, or to one who
does not believe in the world to come (Lane 1:1258). Lane said
that zindiq is an arabicized word originally Persian, so
they say from Az-Zand, which is a book belonging to them,
that is the book of Zoroaster, or from the Persian zandik (1:1258).
The
zanadiqah flourished under various banners during early Islamic history
and wrought havoc by forging thousands of hadiths and propagating them
among the Muslim community (Abdul Rahman 30). Their anti-Islamic
attitude motivated them to forge some hadiths, as they could not do
anything to the Qur’an, which had been transmitted and written down in
early Islam (As-Sabbagh 315). According to some sources, the zanadiqah
concocted about fourteen thousand hadiths.[1] Muhammad
Rashid Rida mentioned that some scholars of Hadith said that when
`Abdul-Karim ibn Abi Al-`Awja’ was to be executed he said, “I
fabricated four thousand hadiths in which I made the lawful prohibited
and the prohibited permissible” (Ibn Al-Jawzi 1:37). By fabricating
hadiths, the zanadiqah did a great damage to the history of Islam (Ibn
Al-Jawzi 1:37). But Siddiqi, recognizing the anti-Islamic motivation of
the zanadiqah, does not see any harm in the forgery of hadiths by the
zanadiqah, as these hadiths were rejected by Muslims (53). An example of
this class of fabrication is the report “When Allah wanted to create
Himself He created the horse first and let it gallop till it sweated.
Then He created Himself from its sweat” (As-Suyuti 1:2).
2.
Political Differences
Islamic
history passed a very critical stage after the death of the third
caliph, `Uthman. Differences and battles between `Ali and Mu`awiyah were
the reason behind the emergence of several religious sects, especially
the Shiah and the Khawarij. Many hadiths, which might be termed as the
fada'il genre, in favor of `Ali and the House of the Prophet, Ahl
Al-Bayt, came from the Shiah. Ibn Abi Al-Hadid (d. AH 655/1257 CE), the
famous commentator of Nahj Al-Balaghah, candidly points to this where he
says
Lies
were introduced in Hadith on merits (fada'il)[2]
originally by the Shi`ah. They in the beginning fabricated many
Hadiths in favor of their man, motivated by enmity towards their
opponents. When the Bakriyyah (those favoring Abu Bakr) found out what
the Shi`ah had done, they in turn fabricated hadiths in favor of their
man. When the Shi`ah found out what the Bakriyyah had done they
increased their efforts.[3]
3.
Favor Seekers
The
various party leaders, the numerous sectarian preachers, and the seekers
of favors from the caliphs and their chiefs, and those who sustained
their legal or theological theories by inventing hadiths were more
dangerous to the authenticity of Hadith than the zanadiqah (Rida
545–547; Siddiqi 53). This was done even, Rida continues, by some of
the Ahl As-Sunnah (Sunnis) who differed among themselves on subsidiary
issues and to support their opinions, they resorted to inventing
hadiths. To gain the favor of sovereigns some people fabricated hadiths
that might please them.
A
well known example is the report of Ghiyath ibn Ibrahim who came upon
the Caliph al-Mahdi (d. 158/785) when this ruler was playing with a
pigeon. Ghiyath recited to him the famous saying of the Prophet:
“There shall be no wager except in the case of racing camels, hoofed
animals or in the case of shooting (competitions)” (Abu Dawud). Then
Ghiyath added the words “and pigeons,” to please Al-Mahdi. The
Caliph gave him a large reward, but stated: “Verily, your neck is
the neck of a liar who puts false words into the mouth of the
Prophet.” Then he ordered the pigeon to be slaughtered. (As-Siba`i
103)
4.
Storytellers
The
storytellers, qussas, were no less dangerous than the party leaders or
sects in fabricating hadiths. They “saw an easy profit by playing on
the credulity of their audience. Some of them were compelled to invent
Hadiths through the urge to instill into their listeners awe and
reverence towards the religion” (Juynboll 100).
The
following incident shows an example of the hadiths invented by such
storytellers:
The
hadiths concocted by the storytellers were few in the first century, but
they increased by the passage of time. Hadith scholars traced these
hadiths, detected their fabricators, and put them under severe
criticism.
|
|
The
hadiths concocted by the storytellers were few in the first
century, but they increased by the passage of time. Hadith
scholars traced these hadiths, detected their fabricators,
and put them under severe criticism. |
|
Ahmad
ibn Hanbal and Yahya ibn Ma`in [4]
were performing their prayers in the mosque of Rusafah when a
storyteller stood up in front of them and began to recite the
following: Ahmad ibn Hanbal and Yahya ibn Ma`in related to us a hadith
on the authority of `Abdur-Razzaq, who in turn had it on the authority
of Ma`mar, who had it on the authority of Qatada, who had it on the
authority of Anas, who reported: “The Prophet of God said,
‘Whoever says: There is no god but God, God will create for him for
every word he utters of this formula a bird with a beak of gold and
feathers of pearls.’” He continued with his story which would have
taken up about twenty pages had he committed it to writing. Upon this
Ahmad ibn Hanbal began to look in amazement at Yahya ibn Ma`in, and
Yahay ibn Ma`in at Ahmad ibn Hanbal. Then Ahmad said, “Did you
narrate this hadith?” Yahya replied, “By God! I never heard this
hadith before this present moment.” The two remained quiet until he
had finished his story. He then undertook to receive contributions and
sat down and waited for the rest to come with their gifts, but Yahya
ibn Ma`in beckoned to him with his hand. So he came supposing that it
was a gift that he was about to give him. Yahya then asked him, “Who
narrated this hadith to you?” He replied, “Ahmad ibn Hanbal and
Yahya ibn Ma`in.” He retorted, “But I am Yahya ibn Ma`in and this
is Ahmad ibn Hanbal! We never heard this story among the hadiths of
the Prophet. As a matter of fact, it is nothing but a falsehood! Its
authorities are not we!” Then he asked, “Are you Yahya ibn
Ma`in?” He answered, “Yes!” He went on, “I constantly hear
that Yahya ibn Ma`in is fool, a fact which I never realized until this
moment.” Then Yahya ibn Ma`in said to him, “How did you know that
I was a fool?” He replied, “You act as if there is no other person
by the name Yahya ibn Ma`in and Ahmad ibn Hanbal. As for me, I have
recorded hadiths on the authority of seventeen persons by the names
Ahmad ibn Hanbal and Yahya ibn Ma`in.” Then Ahmad placed his sleeve
over his face and whispered [to Yahya], “Let him leave.”
The
hadiths concocted by the storytellers were few in the first century, but
they increased by the passage of time. Hadith scholars traced these
hadiths, detected their fabricators, and put them under severe
criticism.
5.
Human Frailties
Neglect,
bad memory, feeble-mindedness, boastfulness, and other human frailties
have also given rise to fabrication (Rida 569).
6.
Ignorant Ascetics
Those
ascetics fabricated hadiths to let the people come close to Allah and
devote much time to different forms of worship and even to encourage
them to be more pious (Ahmad and `Abdul Malik 75). When reminded of the
hadiths threatening those who lie against the Prophet (peace and
blessings be upon him), they say, “We do not tell lies against him but
for him” (As-Siba`i 103). Al-Albani provided us with this example:
“The world is prohibited to people of the Hereafter and the Hereafter
is prohibited to people of the world, and both the world and the
Hereafter are prohibited to the people of Allah” (Al-Albani 1:15).
7.
Prejudice for One’s Own Town, Race or Imam
To
mention only one example of the last motive, that is, to praise one’s
imam, As-Siba`i cites the alleged hadith that praises Abu Hanifah while
degrading Ash-Shafi`i. The hadith reads, “There shall be in my Ummah a
man by the name Muhammad ibn Idris who will be more dangerous to my
Ummah than Iblis and there shall be a man in my Ummah known as Abu
Hanifah who will be the lamp of my Ummah” (As-Siba`i 100). An example
of favoring one’s race is the report that states that “When Allah
gets angry, He reveals the Qur'an in Persian. And when He is satisfied,
He reveals it in Arabic” (Ibn Al-Qayim 59).
Causes
of Unintentional Fabrication
Below
are the unintentional reasons behind the widespread phenomenon of the forgery
of hadiths.
1.
Novelty
Some
transmitters took a well-known hadith and supported it with a new isnad (chain
of transmission) just for the sake of novelty to attract the people around
their transmission.
2.
Mistakes
Sometimes
scholars committed a mistake in the transmission of a hadith when its isnad
ended with a Companion or a Successor only, so they attributed sayings to the
Prophet while a Companion or a Successor was responsible for them.
3.
Inexactness
Some
people were not as exact in the transmission of Hadith as they were in their
worship, so they committed mistakes in the process of transmission.
4.
Indirect Transmission
Some
scholars learned Hadith from a certain sheikh and later came to know that the
same teacher had transmitted other hadiths on different occasions. So instead
of being satisfied with what they learned directly from their teachers, they
transmitted them all, pretending that they had learned them.
5.
Failure to Copy
Some
learned books from certain authorities but did not copy what they learned at
that time. When they grew old and were asked about some hadiths, their desire
to appear professional in the field led them to transmit hadiths from copies
of the same book which they possessed, but which did not contain notes giving
them ijazah (license to teach) in Hadith. This practice was very common in the
fourth century.
6.
Lack of Qualification
Some
people lacked the necessary qualifications for teaching Hadith. Then a student
came and recited hadiths to them that they had not transmitted, but they
ignorantly confirmed the students. [One of the traditional ways of teaching
Hadith is that a student recites a group of hadiths reported originally by the
teacher, and after this recitation, the teacher gives the student the ijazah
that he can report or transmit these hadiths.]
7.
Lost Books
Sometimes
scholars undertook journeys in pursuit of collecting Hadith and were
recognized as Hadith specialists, but unfortunately they lost their books. At
a later stage when they took charge of teaching students, they relied on
copies other than their own, without expecting the possibility of the
existence of some differences between two copies of the same work, or they
relied on their weak memories (A`zami 70-1).
(Part
1)
Sources:
-
Abdul
Rahman, Hasbbullah Haji. “Causes for the Fabrication of Hadith and Means
for Its Elimination,” in IMA (Islam and the Modern Age) New
Delhi, 29. 1998.
-
Ahmad,
Muhammad Shafiq and Muhammad Abdul Malik. Scientific Methodology for the
Authentication of Hadith, in Islam and the Modern Age, 30 (1999).
-
Albani,
Muhammad Nasir Ad-Din, Silsilat Al-Ahadith Ad-Da`ifah wa Al-Mawdu`ah wa
Atharuh As-Sayi’ fil Ummah, 3rd ed. Damascus/Beirut, AH 1392.
-
A`zami,
M. M. Studies in Hadith Methodology and Literature. Indianapolis:
American Trust Publication, Islamic Teaching Center, 1977.
-
Al-Ghazali,
Abu Hamid. Faysal At-Tafriqah Bayna Al-Islam wa Az-Zanadiqah. Ed.
Sulayman Dunya. Cairo, 1381/1961.
-
Al-`Iraqi,
Abu Muhammad `Uthman ibn `Abdullah ibn Al-Hasan. Al-Firaq Al-Muftariqah
bayna Ahli Az-Zayghi wa Az-Zanadiqah. Ed. Yasar Kultuay. Ankara, 1961.
-
Ibn
Al-Jawzi, Kitab Al-Mawdu`at.
-
Ibn
Al-Qayim, Al-Manar Al-Munif fi As-Sahih wa Ad-Da`if, 5th impr., Ed.
`Abd Al-Fattah Abu Ghuddah. Halab: Maktab Al-Matbu`at Al-Islamiyah, 1994.
-
Juynboll,
G.H.A., The Authenticity of the Tradition Literature: Discussions in
Modern Egypt. Leiden: B.J. Brill, 1969.
-
Lane,
Edward William. Arabic-English Lexicon. London-Edinburgh, 1863.
-
Rida,
Muhammad Rashid. “Asbab Wad` Al-Hadith Wa Ikhtilafuh.” in Al-Manar
3 (1900).
-
As-Sabbagh,
Muhammad. Al-Hadith An-Nabawi: Mustalahuhu, Blaghatuhu, Kutubuhu.
3rd ed. Beirut: Al-Maktab al-Islami, 1977.
-
As-Siba`i,
Mustatfa, As-Sunnah wa Makanatuha fi at-Tashri` Al-Islami. Cairo:
Dar Al-`Urubah, 1961.
-
Siddiqi,
Muhammad Zubayr. Hadith Literature: Its Origin, Development and Special
Features. Calcutta University Press, 1961.
-
As-Suyuti,
Al-La’ali’ Al-Masnu`ah fi Al-Ahadith Al-Mawdu`ah. Cairo
1317/1899.
*
Mohsen Haredy
is the editor of Shari`ah Special Pages at
IslamOnline.net. He graduated from Al-Azhar University and has an MA
in Hadith literature from Leiden University, the Netherlands. You can
reach him at mohsen.haredy@iolteam.com.
[1]
This number was given by Hammad ibn Zayd. See Ibn Al-Jawzi,
Al-Mawdu`at 1, p. 30; As-Suyuti, Tadrib, 1, p. 284; Rashid Rida quoted
the number attributed to Hammad ibn Zayd as four thousand. See Rida,
Asbab Wad` Al-Hadith wa Ikhtilafuh, in Al-Manar 3 (1900), p. 545.
[2]
The so-called Fada’il Hadith, according to Juynboll, hold a foremost
place. He defines this genre as the Hadith “in which the Prophet is
alleged to have uttered laudatory or favorable remarks about the
person, the group of persons, the town or the country, who or which
particularly figure in a political or theological movement.” For
more on the discussions on Fada’il Hadith see Abu Rayyah, Adwa’,
p. 90; `Ajjaj Al-Khatib, As-Sunnah Qabla At-Tadwin, p. 197f;
As-Siba`i, As-Sunnah, pp. 233-5. cf. Juynboll, Authenticity, pp.
101-2.
[3]
Cf. Suhaib Hasan Abdul Ghaffar, Criticism of Hadith among Muslim with
reference to Sunan Ibn Maja, London, Al-Qur’an Society, 1986, p. 35;
`Ajjaj Al-Khatib, As-Sunnah Qabla At-Tadwin, p. 195; Juynboll,
Muslim Hadith, p. 12.
[4]
Both Swartz and Goldziher wrote it “Mu`in,” which is wrong.
Therefore it should read Ma`in. It is interesting to note that Ibn
Ma`in (d. 233/847) composed a book on the characteristic of Hadith
transmitters. The work is entitled Kalam Yahya ibn Ma`in fi
Ar-Rijal,
which is also referred to in Muslim scholarship as Kitab
Al-Majruhin,
which must not be confused with the work by Ibn Hibban, see GAS, V,
pp. 106-7; see also Asma Afsaruddin, An Insight into the Hadith
Methodology p. 35, n. 47.
|